green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.1 score
“defendant can be convicted solely on circumstantial evidence.”
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. John Dixon Clark
defendant can be convicted solely on circumstantial evidence.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Donald M. PARADIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. A.J. ARAVE, Warden, Idaho State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee
paradis ii
discussed
Cited "see"
Poole v. State
See Woolls v. State, 665 S.W.2d 455, 470 (Tex. Crim.App.1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3592 , 82 L.Ed.2d 889 (1984) (holding no reversible error in admission of testimony relating to extraneous offense where evidence of same acts properly admitted elsewhere at trial).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Pratt
(2×)
See State v. Gibson, 106 Idaho 54, 62 , 675 P.2d 33, 41 (1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3592 , 82 L.Ed.2d 888 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Black
See Routly v. State, 440 So.2d 1257, 1261 (Fla. 1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3591 , 82 L.Ed.2d 888 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Stephens
See Routly v. State, 440 So.2d 1257 (Fla.1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3591 , 82 L.Ed.2d 888 (1984); Ray v. State, 522 So.2d 963 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 531 So.2d 168 (Fla.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Stephens
See Routly v. State, 440 So.2d 1257 (Fla. 1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3591 , 82 L.Ed.2d 888 (1984); Ray v. State, 522 So.2d 963 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 531 So.2d 168 (Fla. 1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Dambrell
(2×)
See, State v. Gibson, 106 Idaho 54, 58 , 675 P.2d 33 , cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3592 , 82 L.Ed.2d 888 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Reynolds
See State v. Gibson, 106 Idaho 54 , 675 P.2d 33 (1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3592 , 82 L.Ed.2d 888 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fetterly v. Paskett
State v. Fetterly, 109 Idaho 766 , 710 P.2d 1202 (1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 870 , 107 S.Ct. 239 , 93 L.Ed.2d 164 (1986); see State v. Sivak, 105 Idaho 900 , 674 P.2d 396 (1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3591 , 82 L.Ed.2d 887 (1984); State v. Creech, 105 Idaho 362 , 670 P.2d 463 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1051 , 104 S.Ct. 1327 , 79 L.Ed.2d 722 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Parker v. Dugger
See Dobbert v. Strickland, 718 F.2d 1518, 1524 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3591 , 82 L.Ed.2d 887 (1984). 28 Parker first points to language from the Florida Supreme Court's opinion disposing of his direct appeal, in which the court stated that "[i]n addition to considering all other issues raised on appeal, we have conducted an independent review of the record o[f] trial and find no reason to award a new trial." Parker I, 458 So.2d at 754 .
cited
Cited "see"
Parker v. Dugger
See Dobbert v. Strickland, 718 F.2d 1518, 1524 (11th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3591 , 82 L.Ed.2d 887 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Joseph Redman v. Richard L. Dugger
See Dobbert v. Strickland, 718 F.2d 1518 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3591 , 82 L.Ed.2d 887 (1984). 2 Even liberally construing this pro se petition, it is unclear that petitioner has alleged sufficient facts to support a due process violation. 3 The petitioner’s argument is based on the failure of the police and prosecution to preserve evidence.
discussed
Cited "see"
Fred B. Stacey, Jr. v. Warden, Apalachee Correctional Institution
See Dobbert v. Strickland, 718 F.2d 1518, 1524 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3591 , 82 L.Ed.2d 887 (1984); see also Oliver v. Wainwright, 795 F.2d 1524, 1528 (11th Cir.1986) (where state court declined to specify whether it had reached merits, federal court should reach merits), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 921 , 107 S.Ct. 1380 , 94 L.Ed.2d 694 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sivak v. State
(2×)
See State v. Sivak, 105 Idaho 900, 906 , 674 P.2d 396, 402 (1983), cert. den., 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3591 , 82 L.Ed.2d 887 (1984); see also State v. Creech, 105 Idaho 362 , 670 P.2d 463 (1983), cert. den., 465 U.S. 1051 , 104 S.Ct. 1327 , 79 L.Ed.2d 722 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Marks
However, such acts may be “admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.” I.R.E. 404(b); see also State v. Paradis, 106 Idaho 117 , 676 P.2d 31 (1984), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3592 , 82 L.Ed.2d 888 (1984); State v. Wrenn, 99 Idaho 506 , 584 P.2d 1231 (1978); State v. Hatton, 95 Idaho 856 , 522 P.2d 64 (1974); State v. Shepherd, 94 Idaho 227 , 486 P.2d 82 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hill v. State
See, e.g., Woolls v. State, 665 S.W.2d 455, 467 (Tex.Crim.App.1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3592 , 82 L.Ed.2d 889 (1984) (jury not impanelled until sworn as a body); Reese v. State, 142 Tex.Crim. 254, 266-67 , 151 S.W.2d 828, 835 (1941) (impanelled implies grand jurors sworn); Howard v. State, 80 Tex.Crim. 588, 591-92 , 192 S.W. 770, 772 (1917) (jury not impanelled until sworn); Stephens v. State, 33 Tex.Crim. 101, 102 , 25 S.W. 286, 286 (1894) (jury not impanelled until sworn); Rippey v. State, 29 Tex.App. 37 , 42-44, 14 S.W. 448, 449 (1890) (jury not impanelled until sworn a…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
C_ E_ J v. State
See also Woolls v. State, 665 S.W.2d 455, 467 (Tex.Crim.App.1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3592 , 82 L.Ed.2d 889 (1984) (jury not impanelled until sworn as a body); B.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
C----E----J v. State
See also Woolls v. State, 665 S.W.2d 455, 467 (Tex.Crim.App.1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3592 , 82 L.Ed.2d 889 (1984) (jury not impanelled until sworn as a body); B.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lankford
(2×)
See also State v. Sivak, 105 Idaho 900, 902 , 674 P.2d 396, 398 (1983) cert. den. 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3591 , 82 L.Ed.2d 887 , (1984); State v. Fetterly, 109 Idaho 766 , 710 P.2d 1202 (1985) cert. den., 479 U.S. 870 , 107 S.Ct. 239 , 93 L.Ed.2d 164 (1986); *206 State v. Fain, [ 116 Idaho 82 , 774 P.2d 252 (1989)].
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Charboneau
(2×)
See also State v. Sivak, 105 Idaho 900, 902 , 674 P.2d 396, 398 (1983) cert. den. 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3591 , 82 L.Ed.2d 887 (1984); State v. Fetterly, 109 Idaho 766 , 710 P.2d 1202 (1985) cert. den., 479 U.S. 870 , 107 S.Ct. 239 , 93 L.Ed.2d 164 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lenson A. Hargrave v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida
See Campbell v. Wainwright, 738 F.2d 1573, 1576-77 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1126 , 106 S.Ct. 1652 , 90 L.Ed.2d 195 (1986); Rogers v. McMullen, 673 F.2d 1185, 1188 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1110 , 103 S.Ct. 740 , 74 L.Ed.2d 961 (1983); see also Dobbert v. Strickland, 718 F.2d 1518, 1524 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3591 , 82 L.Ed.2d 887 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hargrave v. Dugger
See Campbell v. Wainwright, 738 F.2d 1573, 1576-77 (11th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1126 , 106 S.Ct. 1652 , 90 L.Ed.2d 195 (1986); Rogers v. McMullen, 673 F.2d 1185, 1188 (11th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 1110 , 103 S.Ct. 740 , 74 L.Ed.2d 961 (1983); see also Dobbert v. Strickland, 718 F.2d 1518, 1524 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3591 , 82 L.Ed.2d 887 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Winkler
State v. Roach, 109 Idaho 973, 974 , 712 P.2d 674, 675 (Ct.App.1985); see, e.g., State v. Paradis, 106 Idaho 117 , 676 P.2d 31 (1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3592 , 82 L.Ed.2d 888 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carroll v. State
See also Routly v. State, 440 So.2d 1257, 1261 (Fla. 1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3591 , 82 L.Ed.2d 888 (1984); Cummings v. State, 378 So.2d 879 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), cert. denied, 386 So.2d 635 (Fla. 1980); Nelson v. State, 188 So.2d 353 *260 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966). [6] It is undisputed that Parmenter, the Miami detective, had probable cause to arrest the defendant when he initiated the communication with the New York authorities.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mahoney
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 83-5614.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jul 5, 1984.
Brennan, Certiorari.
Cited by 82 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1) · Idaho Court of Appeals (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall would grant certiorari.