discussed Cited "see" Donald M. Johnson v. Louisiana Department of Agriculture, Bob Odom See, Johnson v. Odom, 470 So.2d 988 (La.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 476 So.2d 355 (La.1985) (Johnson violated the law by using pesticide inappropriately, but remanded because Commissioner not authorized by statute to impose both fine and suspension); Johnson v. Odom, 536 So.2d 541 (La.App. 1st Cir.1988); writ denied, 537 So.2d 213 (1989) (Johnson violated the law by flying without a license, but fine excessive; Johnson violated the law, but penalties unfair; Johnson admitted committing battery on a Department worker trying to serve a subpoena, but the. worker did not have the statutory power …

discussed Cited "see" Johnson v. Louisiana Dept. of Agriculture See, Johnson v. Odom, 470 So.2d 988 (La.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 476 So.2d 355 (La.1985) (Johnson violated the law by using pesticide inappropriately, but remanded because Commissioner not authorized by statute to impose 2 Before Albright, supra, this circuit attempted to distinguish malicious prosecution claims in criminal proceedings which generally are serious enough to rise to the constitutional level, and those based on civil proceedings, which do not usually raise a constitutional issue.

cited Cited "see" Leray v. Shell Oil Co. See Duerden v. PBR Offshore Marine Corp., 471 So.2d 1111 (La.App. 3 Cir.1985), writ denied, 476 So.2d 355 (La.1985).

cited Cited "see, e.g." Johnson v. Odom See also Johnson v. Odom, 470 So.2d 988 (La. 1st Cir.), writ denied 476 So.2d 355 (La.1985); Johnson v. Odom, 536 So.2d 541 (La. 1st Cir.1988), writ denied 537 So.2d 213 (La.1989).