green
Positive treatment
10.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
State of Missouri Ex Rel. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe, a Federally Recognized Indian Tribe State of Missouri Ex Rel. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General v. Unistar Entertainment, Inc. Executone Information Systems, Inc. Ernest Stensgar David Matheson
But see Division 241 Amalgamated Transit Union v. Suscy, 538 F.2d 1264 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1029 , 97 S.Ct. 653 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976).
cited
Cited "but see"
Missouri Ex Rel. Nixon v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe
But see Division 211 Amalgamated Transit Union v. Suscy, 538 F.2d 1264 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1029 , 97 S.Ct. 653 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Martini
(2×)
Further, the State has a parallel and equally compelling basis for assuring confidentiality — the public interest and its overarching responsibility in protecting all of its citizens. “[T]he Eighth Amendment not only protects the right of individuals not to be victims of cruel and unusual punishment, [it] also expresses a fundamental interest of society in ensuring that state authority is not used to administer barbaric punishments.” Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012, 1019 , 97 S.Ct. 436, 440 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632, 636 (1976) (Marshall, J., dissenting from termination of stay of execution).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Richard Lovelace, Applicant and as Next Friend of Ramon Pedro Hernandez v. James A. Lynaugh, Acting Director, Texas State Department of Corrections
Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012, 1014 , 97 S.Ct. 436, 437 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 *1138 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Al-Aulaqi v. Obama
See Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012, 1017 , 97 S.Ct. 436 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fahy v. Horn
(2×)
See Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012 , 97 S.Ct. 436 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Charles Comer v. Dora B. Schriro, Director, of Arizona Department of Corrections
(2×)
See Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012, 1016-17 , 97 S.Ct. 436 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976) (Burger, C.J., concurring) (once a competent petitioner waives further review, the court lacks jurisdiction to consider other issues no matter their merit); see also Massie ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Comer v. Stewart
See Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012 , 97 S.Ct. 436 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976); Whitmore v. Arkansas, 495 U.S. 149, 165 , 110 S.Ct. 1717 , 109 L.Ed.2d 135 (1990)(“next friend” standing is not available if “an evidentiary hearing shows that the defendant has given a knowing, intelligent and voluntary waiver of his right to proceed, and his access to court is otherwise unimpeded”); see also Brewer v. Lewis, 989 F.2d 1021, 1027 (9th Cir.1993); Lenhard v. Wolff, 603 F.2d 91, 93 (9th Cir.1979).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Robbins
See Gilmore v. *58 Utah, 429 U.S. 1012, 97 S.Ct. 436 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Clark
(2×)
See Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012 , 97 S.Ct. 436 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976). {85} The Legislature, pursuant to Section 31-20A-4(A), requires this Court to review the judgment of conviction and sentence of death automatically.
cited
Cited "see"
Ganzy v. Allen Christian School
See Whitlow v. Hodges, 539 F.2d 582 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1029 , 97 S.Ct. 654 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Red Dog v. State
See Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012 , 97 S.Ct. 436 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976); Hammett v. Texas, 448 U.S. 725 , 100 S.Ct. 2905 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1086 (1980) (per curiam), Lenhard v. Wolff, 444 U.S. 807 , 100 S.Ct. 29 , 62 L.Ed.2d 20 (1979); Mitchell v. Lawrence ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Pennell v. State
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012 , 97 S.Ct. 436 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Brewer
(2×)
See [Bessie] Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012, 1014-17 , 97 S.Ct. 436, 438-39 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976) (court declines jurisdiction over application for stay of execution filed by Gary Gilmore's mother over his objection).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
See, for example, Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012 , 97 S.Ct. 436 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976) (convicted murderer's mother could not seek stay of execution where murderer himself knowingly and intelligently waived his right to appeal).
discussed
Cited "see"
Amato v. Wilentz
See, for example, Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012 , 97 S.Ct. 436 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976) (convicted murderer’s mother could not seek stay of execution where murderer himself knowingly and intelligently waived his right to appeal).
cited
Cited "see"
Molinelli v. Tucker
See Division 241, Amalgamated Transit Union v. Suscy, 538 F.2d 1264 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1029 , 97 S.Ct. 653 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976)
cited
Cited "see"
Molinelli v. Tucker
See Division 241, Amalgamated Transit Union v. Suscy, 538 F.2d 1264 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1029 , 97 S.Ct. 653 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hamblen v. Dugger
See Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012 , 97 S.Ct. 436 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976) (per curiam); Rosenberg v. United States, 346 U.S. 273, 291-92 , 73 S.Ct. 1152, 1161-62 , 97 L.Ed. 1607 (1953) (opinion of Jackson, J., joined by five Members of the Court), adopted by the Court, id. at 288, 73 S.Ct. at 1160 ; Lovelace v. Lynaugh, 809 F.2d 1136, 1137-38 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1071 , 107 S.Ct. 966 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1987); Smith, 812 F.2d at 1059; Lenhard, 603 F.2d at 93 ; Evans, 467 F.Supp. at 1111 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Whitmore v. State
See Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012 , 97 S.Ct. 436 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976), where the Supreme Court reversed the record bearing on Gilmore's competency and decided his mother did not have standing to speak for him.
discussed
Cited "see"
Transport Workers' Union of Philadelphia, Local 234, in No. 88-1206 v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, in No. 88-1160. Transport Workers Union of America, Local 2013 v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority and Louis F. Gould, Jr., Esquire, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Chairman of the Board of Septa Robert J. Thompson, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Vice Chairman of the Board of Septa Brian W. Clymer Judith E. Harris, Esquire Mary C. Harris, Thomas M. Hayward, C.P.A. Frank W. Jenkins, Esquire Richard E. Kutz, Esquire David W. Marston, Esquire James C. McHugh and Franklin C. Wood, Individually and in Their Official Capacities as Members of the Board of Septa, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, Division 71 and Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Thomas C. Brennan, in No. 88-1207 v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority and Louis F. Gould, Jr., Esquire, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Chairman of the Board of Septa Robert J. Thompson, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Vice Chairman of the Board of Septa Brian W. Clymer Judith E. Harris, Esquire Mary C. Harris Thomas M. Hayward, C.P.A. Frank W. Jenkins, Esquire Richard E. Kutz, Esquire David W. Marston, Esquire James C. McHugh and Franklin C. Wood, Individually and in Their Official Capacity as Members of the Board of Septa, in No. 88-1162. United Transportation Union, Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employees, Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees, Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen, in No. 88-1208 v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, in No. 88-1163
See Division 241, Amalgamated Transit Union v. Suscy, 538 F.2d 1264, 1267 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1029 , 97 S.Ct. 653 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976) ("probable cause" exists for post-accident and suspicion-based testing).
discussed
Cited "see"
Transport Workers' Union of Philadelphia, Local 234 v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
See Division 241, Amalgamated Transit Union v. Suscy, 538 F.2d 1264, 1267 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1029 , 97 S.Ct. 653 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976) (“probable cause” exists for post-accident and suspicion-based testing).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Keith
See, Gilmore v. Utah (1976), 429 U.S. 1012 , 97 S.Ct. 436 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 ; and Judy v. State (1981), 275 Ind. 145 , 416 N.E.2d 95 .
cited
Cited "see"
Franz v. Lockhart
See, Gilmore, 429 U.S. 1012 , 97 S.Ct. 436 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 ; Rees, 384 U.S. 312 , 86 S.Ct. 1505 , 16 L.Ed.2d 583 ; Armontrout, 812 F.2d 1050 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Keith
See, Gilmore v. Utah (1976), 429 U.S. 1012 , 97 S.Ct. 436 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 ; and Judy v. State (Ind. 1981), 416 N.E.2d 95 .
cited
Cited "see"
DeShields v. State
See Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012 , 1017, 97 S.Ct. 436, 439 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632, 635 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carl A. Sanders v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
See Division 241, Amalgamated Transit Union v. Suscy, 538 F.2d 1264, 1267 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1029 , 97 S.Ct. 653 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976) (upholding Chicago Transit Authority’s comparable tests for drugs and alcohol); Turner v. Fraternal Order of Police, 500 A.2d 1005, 1008 (D.C.App.1985) (same for police of the District of Columbia).
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Armontrout
Weber v. Garza, 570 F.2d 511, 513-14 (5th Cir.1978); see Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012 , 97 S.Ct. 436 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976); 28 U.S.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith ex rel. Missouri Public Defender Commission v. Armontrout
Weber v. Garza, 570 F.2d 511, 513-14 (5th Cir.1978); see Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012 , 97 S.Ct. 436 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976); 28 U.S.C. § 2242 (“Application for writ of habeas corpus shall be in writing signed and verified by the person for whose relief it is intended or by someone acting in his behalf.”) The sufficiency of Eugene Smith’s relationship with his brother was, of course, undisputed, so the District Court hearing, which began February 18, 1986, focused upon Smith’s decision to waive further proceedings.
cited
Cited "see"
Jones v. State
See Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012 , 97 S.Ct. 436 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Jones v. State
See Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012 , 97 S.Ct. 436 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bailey
See Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012 , 97 S.Ct. 436 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976); Rumbaugh v. Estelle, N.D.Tex., 558 F.Supp. 651 (1983), aff'd sub nom.
cited
Cited "see"
SMITH BY AND THROUGH SMITH v. Armontrout
See Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012 , 97 S.Ct. 436, 439 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976) (Burger, C.J., concurring).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith by and Through Smith v. Armontrout
See Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012 , 1016, 97 S.Ct. 436, 439 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976) (Burger, C.J. concurring). 1 Many courts have faithfully followed these procedures in handling cases such as the present one.
discussed
Cited "see"
Allen v. City of Marietta
See Division 241 Amalgamated Transit Union (AFL-CIO) v. Suscy, 538 F.2d 1264 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1029 , 97 S.Ct. 653 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976); Ewing v. State, 160 Ind.App. 138 , 310 N.E.2d 571 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Andrews v. Shulsen
See Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012 , 97 S.Ct. 436 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976). 17 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Felde
See Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012 , 97 S.Ct. 436 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976). [18] Bishop controls this issue.
cited
Cited "see"
Faulder v. State
See generally Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012 , 97 S.Ct. 436 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Potts v. Austin
See Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012 , 97 S.Ct. 436 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Capetola v. Orlando
See Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012 , 97 S.Ct. 436 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bowling v. Commonwealth
(2×)
CR 52.01. [1] Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 321 , 122 S.Ct. 2242, 2252 , 153 L.Ed.2d 335 (2002). [2] Atkins, 536 U.S. at 321 , 122 S.Ct. at 2252 (citing Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 405 , 106 S.Ct. 2595, 2599 , 91 L.Ed.2d 335 (1986)) (emphasis added); see also Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012, 1019 , 97 S.Ct. 436, 440 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976) (Marshall, J., dissenting) ("I believe that the Eighth Amendment not only protects the right of individuals not to be victims of cruel and unusual punishment, but that it also expresses a fundamental interest of society in ensuring that state author…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McClure v. Ashcroft
See also Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012, 1013-17 , 97 S.Ct. 436 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976) (majority held defendant knowingly and intelligently waived all federal rights to challenge conviction and did not address standing; Burger, C.J. and Powell, J., concurring, opined that defendant’s mother lacked standing to seek a stay of execution for her son).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Dunster
See, e.g., Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012 , 97 S. Ct. 436 , 50 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Civil Liberties Union v. City of Florissant
See Paster v. Tussey, 512 S.W.2d 97, 100 (Mo. en banc 1974), cert. denied 419 U.S. 1111 , 95 S.Ct. 785 , 42 L.Ed.2d 807 (1975)(holding unconstitutional a state statute which would have allowed state funds to be used for purchase of textbooks at parochial schools); see also, e.g., Americans United v. Rogers, 538 S.W.2d 711, 719 (Mo. en banc 1976), cert. denied 429 U.S. 1029 , 97 S.Ct. 653 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976); Harfst v. Hoegen, 349 Mo. 808 , 163 S.W.2d 609 (1941).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Frank
See also Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012 , 97 S.Ct. 436 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976) (miscellaneous order terminating a stay of execution in a factually similar case).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dannenberg v. Software Toolworks Inc.
Compare Horwitz v. Alloy Automotive Company, 957 F.2d 1431, 1436 (7th Cir.1992) (refusing to hear appeal after dismissal without prejudice) and DuBose v. Minnesota, 893 F.2d 169, 171 (8th Cir.1990) (same) with Division 241 Amalgamated Transit Union v. Suscy, 538 F.2d 1264 , 1266 & n. 1 (7th Cir.) (hearing, without analysis, appeal from nonfinal order after plaintiff dismissed without prejudice the unresolved claims), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1029 , 97 S.Ct. 653 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976) and Chrysler Motors Corp. v. Thomas Auto Co., 939 F.2d 538, 540 (8th Cir.1991) (same). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Bushert
See, e.g., Gil *1352 more v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012, 1014-15 , 97 S.Ct. 436, 438 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976) (Burger, C.J., concurring in order terminating stay of execution) (agreeing that "next friend” standing not available because individual sentenced to death "knowingly and intelligently, with full knowledge of his right to seek an appeal[,] ... waived that right”); cf. Medina v. California, — U.S. -, -, 112 S.Ct. 2572, 2579 , 120 L.Ed.2d 353 (1992) (applying "knowing and intelligent” standard to a discussion of the waiver of the right to a competency hearing); United States v. Mendoza-L…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kukla v. Village of Antioch
See also Division 241 Amalgamated Transit Union v. Suscy, 538 F.2d 1264, 1266 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1029 , 97 S.Ct. 653 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hightower
See also Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 1012 , 97 S.Ct. 436 , 50 L.Ed. 2d 632 (1976), where the United States Supreme Court by a 5-4 memorandum decision allowed a condemned defendant to waive his rights to *45 federal review and submit to execution.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Burka v. New York City Transit Authority
See, e.g., Division 241 Amalgamated Transit Union v. Suscy, 538 F.2d 1264 (7th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1029 , 97 S.Ct. 653 , 50 L.Ed.2d 632 (1976) (challenge to blood and urine tests administered by the Chicago Transit Authority); The Committee for GI Rights v. Callaway, 518 F.2d 466 (D.C.Cir.1975) (challenge to army’s drug testing policy); Jones v. McKenzie, 628 F.Supp. 1500 (D.D.C.1986) (challenge to school system's program of surveilling employees for drug use); Allen v. City of Marietta, 601 F.Supp. 482 (N.D.Ga.1985) (challenge by employees at city's electrical plant to urinaly…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Whitlow
v.
Hodges, Director, Division of Driver Licensing, Department of Public Safety of Kentucky
v.
Hodges, Director, Division of Driver Licensing, Department of Public Safety of Kentucky
No. 76-552.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 13, 1976.
429 U.S. 1029
Brennan, Certiorari.
Cited by 253 opinions | Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice. Brennan and Mr. Justice Marshall would grant certiorari.