green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ralph Hubert Barger
As such, this circuit has been reluctant to grant the sanctions that the appellant seeks, since “to do so would greatly intrude into the law enforcement functions of the executive branches of federal and state governments.” Uni ted States v. Norton, 700 F.2d 1072, 1075 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 910 , 103 S.Ct. 1885 , 76 L.Ed.2d 814 (1983); see also United States v. Bowling, 666 F.2d 1052 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 1475 , 71 L.Ed.2d 680 (1982); United States v. Leja, 563 F.2d 244 (6th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1074 , 98 S.Ct. 1263 , 55 L.Ed.2d 78…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ralph Hubert Barger
As such, this circuit has been reluctant to grant the sanctions that the appellant seeks, since "to do so would greatly intrude into the law enforcement functions of the executive branches of federal and state governments." United States v. Norton, 700 F.2d 1072, 1075 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 910 (1983); see also United States v. Bowling, 666 F.2d 1052 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 960 (1982); United States v. Leja, 563 F.2d 244 (6th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1074 (1978). 19 The Sixth Circuit has articulated four factors for determining if governmental conduct is out…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People ex rel. M.N.
Appellants here can only complain that they were taken in by the agents’ well practiced disguise. 539 F.2d at 1239-40 (citations omitted) (quoting United States v. Russell, 411 U.S. 423, 432 , 93 S.Ct. 1637, 1643 , 36 L.Ed.2d 366 (1973)); see United States v. McQuin, 612 F.2d 1193 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 955 , 100 S.Ct. 1608 , 63 L.Ed.2d 791 (1980) (actions of FBI informant who told the defendant that another agent would kill him if he did not go through with the planned robbery held not to be outrageous conduct); see also United States v. Bowling, 666 F.2d 1052 (6th Cir.1981), ce…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People in Interest of MN
Appellants here can only complain that they were taken in by the agents' well practiced disguise. 539 F.2d at 1239-40 (citations omitted) (quoting United States v. Russell, 411 U.S. 423, 432 , 93 S.Ct. 1637, 1643 , 36 L.Ed.2d 366 (1973)); see United States v. McQuin, 612 F.2d 1193 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 955 , 100 S.Ct. 1608 , 63 L.Ed.2d 791 (1980) (actions of FBI informant who told *1129 the defendant that another agent would kill him if he did not go through with the planned robbery held not to be outrageous conduct); see also United States v. Bowling, 666 F.2d 1052 (6th Cir.1981)…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Darrel Paterson Simpson, Robert MacRiner Anderson, and James Roy Freeman
See, e.g., United States v. O’Connor, 737 F.2d 814 , 817-18 (9th Cir.1984) (use of informant to sell cocaine provided by government was not outrageous), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1218 , 105 S.Ct. 1198 , 84 L.Ed.2d 343 (1985); see also United States v. Bowling, 666 F.2d 1052, 1054-55 (6th Cir.1981) (informant’s participation in nonviolent property crimes held not to be outrageous), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 1475 , 71 L.Ed.2d 680 (1982); United States v. Brown, 635 F.2d 1207, 1213 (6th Cir.1980) (same). 9 D THE GOVERNMENT’S INVOLVEMENT IN “MANUFACTURING” THE DEFENDANTS’ CRI…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Fountaine v. State
See also United States v. Bowling, 666 F.2d 1052 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 960 , 102 S.Ct. 1475 , 71 L.Ed.2d 680 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Castro
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 81-6064.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1982.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.