green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.1 score
“martinez”
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Diaz v. LeFevre
Martinez v. Harris, 675 F.2d 51, 54 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S Ct. 109, 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Crosby
See United States v. Contreras, 667 F.2d 976, 979 (11th Cir.) (warnings adequate where they advised of “right to consult with an attorney prior to questioning, to have an attorney present during questioning, and to have counsel appointed”), ce rt. den., 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982); Caparrosa v. Gov’t of Canal Zone, 411 F.2d 956 (5th Cir.1969) (warnings inadequate where they failed to inform of right to counsel present during his interrogation); Atwell v. United States, 398 F.2d 507 (5th Cir.1968) (warning inadequate where it “does not comply with Miranda’s dir…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mathis
See United States v. Crosby, 739 F.2d 1542, 1548 (11th Cir.) (citing United States v. Marx, 635 F.2d 436, 440-441 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981) and United States v. Contreras, 667 F.2d 976 , 978 n. 2 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982)), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1076 , 105 S.Ct. 576 , 83 L.Ed.2d 515 (1984); see also United States v. Vasquez, 858 F.2d 1387, 1389 (9th Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 488 U.S. 1034 , 109 S.Ct. 847 , 102 L.Ed.2d 978 and 489 U.S. 1029 , 109 S.Ct. 1161 , 103 L.Ed.2d 220 (1989); 3 Charles Alan Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure: Crimina…
discussed
Cited "see"
Cannon v. District of Columbia
See Boag v. Chief of Police, City of Portland, 669 F.2d 587, 589 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982); Jordan v. State, 290 N.Y.S.2d 621, 625 , 56 Misc.2d 1032 (N.Y.Ct.Cl.1968); Jepson v. Stubbs, 555 S.W.2d 307, 311 (Mo.1977) ( en banc); Jimenez v. Maloney, 646 S.W.2d 673, 674-75 (Tex.App.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ethel L. Hardin v. Gary Black, Warden
See, Campbell v. Wainwright, 738 F.2d 1573, 1578 (11th Cir.1984), adopting the reasoning of Martinez v. Harris, 675 F.2d 51 (2d Cir.), cert denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982). 7 .
cited
Cited "see"
Farinaro v. Kirk
See Martinez v. Harris, 675 F.2d 51 , 54-55 & n. 5 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Turner v. Sullivan
See Martinez v. Harris, 675 F.2d 51, 55 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Harper v. Bowen
See United States v. Contreras, 667 F.2d 976, 979 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982) 2 These regulations now appear at 20 C.F.R.
cited
Cited "see"
Harper v. Bowen
See United States v. Contreras, 667 F.2d 976, 979 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Holland v. Scully
See Martinez v. Harris, 675 F.2d 51 (2d Cir.) (establishing presumption that summary denial was based on procedural grounds), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982). 58 Further, as the Magistrate pointed out, accepting Holland's view would undermine the procedural bar rule of N.Y.C.P.L.
cited
Cited "see"
Holland v. Scully
See Martinez v. Harris, 675 F.2d 51 (2d Cir.) (establishing presumption that summary denial was based on procedural grounds), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jesse James Jackson v. Charles C. Scully, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility
When the state appellate courts are silent as to the basis for dismissal of a claim, we have assumed that the basis for the dismissal is procedural default "only if the state prosecutor argued procedural default in the state appellate court.” Barber v. Scully, 731 F.2d 1073, 1075 (2d Cir.1984); see Martinez v. Harris, 675 F.2d 51, 54 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Armando Benitez
See United States v. Contreras, 667 F.2d 976, 980 (11th Cir.), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Calvin Carlos Campbell v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Corrections
See supra note 2.) 4 In deciding whether the state court reached the merits, we adopt the reasoning of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Martinez v. Harris, 675 F.2d 51, 54 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Grant v. Abrams
See Martinez v. Harris, 675 F.2d 51 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Leonardo Chavez
Compare also United States v. Ulloa, 882 F.2d 41, 43 (2d Cir.1989) (failure to make timely motion constitutes waiver of that right even where trial court considers the merits), and United States v. Oldfield, 859 F.2d 392, 396 (6th Cir.1988) (issues raised in untimely motion to suppress are waived on appeal “even though the district court rules on the merits”), with United States v. Vasquez, 858 F.2d 1387, 1389 (9th Cir.1988) (when “district court considers and resolves an untimely suppression motion on its merits, we may review that decision on appeal”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rodolfo Morales, Paul Kolb, Jorge Manzano
In the present case Kolb’s explanation of his involvement is so unbelievable that “it gives rise to positive evidence in favor of the government.” United States v. Eley, 723 F.2d at 1525 ; see also United States v. Contreras, 667 F.2d 976, 980 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Walker v. Hood
See also Martinez v. Harris, 675 F.2d 51, 53 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fox v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Contreras, 667 F.2d 976 , 978 n. 2 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982); United States v. Gresham, 585 F.2d 103, 108 (5th Cir.1978); United States v. Schwartz, 535 F.2d 160, 163 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 906 , 97 S.Ct. 1175 , 51 L.Ed.2d 581 (1977); State v. Griffin, 117 Ariz. 54 , 570 P.2d 1067, 1069 (1977); State v. Neese, 126 Ariz. 499 , 616 P.2d 959, 966-67 (Ariz.App, 1980); People v. Martinez, 14 Cal.3d 533 , 121 Cal.Rptr. 611, 613-614 , 535 P.2d 739 , *1270 741-42 (1975); State v. Gerhardt, 97 Idaho 603 …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Arellanes
v.
Hadden
v.
Hadden
No. 81-6859.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1982.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.