green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.4 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Brayboy v. State
generally, ineffective assistance of counsel is a collateral matter which should be addressed through a motion for post-conviction relief.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rooney v. State
See Stewart v. State, 420 So.2d 862 (Fla.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1103 , 103 S.Ct. 1802 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 (1983); Craven v. State, 624 So.2d 866 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Gregory v. State, 588 So.2d 676 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Power v. Arlington Hospital
See Arnold, v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 681 F.2d 186 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 1801 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. State
See Stewart v. State, 420 So.2d 862 , 864 & n. 4 (Fla.1982), cert. den., 460 U.S. 1103 , 103 S.Ct. 1802 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 (1983) (ineffective assistance of counsel is collateral matter that may not be raised for the first time on appeal, unless facts on which claim is based are evident in appellate record); Blanco v. Wainwright, 507 So.2d 1377, 1384 (Fla.1987); Antunovich v. State, 491 So.2d 328, 329 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Salley
See Stewart v. State, 420 So.2d 862 (Fla. 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1103 , 103 S.Ct. 1802 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 ; Gregory v. State, 588 So.2d 676 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cain v. Armstrong World Industries
See Arnold v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 712 F.2d 899 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 1801 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 (1983) and 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984) (New trial granted due to prejudicial effect of consolidation of actions against airlines and their insurers).
discussed
Cited "see"
Knight v. United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance
Spirides v. Reinhardt, 613 F.2d 826, 832 (D.C.Cir.1979); accord, Unger v. Consolidated Foods Corp., 657 F.2d 909 , 916 n. 8 (7th Cir.1981), vacated on other grounds 456 U.S. 1002 , 102 S.Ct. 2288 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1297 (1982), on remand, 693 F.2d 703 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 1801 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Mason v. Texaco, Inc.
See Arnold v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 681 F.2d 186, 190 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 1801 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 (1983). 19 .
cited
Cited "see"
Ventura v. State
See Stewart v. State, 420 So.2d 862 (Fla. 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1103 , 103 S.Ct. 1802 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 (1983); Foster v. State, 387 So.2d 344 (Fla. 1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Insurance Company of North America, Inc. v. U.S. Gypsum Company, Inc.
See Arnold v. Eastern Airlines, Inc., 681 F.2d 186, 199-200 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 1801 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 on rehearing, Arnold v. Eastern Airlines, Inc., 712 F.2d 899 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed. 2d 168 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Drago v. Celotex Corp.
See Arnold v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 681 F.2d 186, 193 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 1801 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 (1983) and 464 U.S. 1040 , 104 S.Ct. 703 , 79 L.Ed.2d 168 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Watson v. State
See Stewart v. State, 420 So.2d 862 (Fla.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1103 , 103 S.Ct. 1802 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Brown v. Sachs (In Re Brown)
See, Unger v. Consolidated Foods Corp., 693 F.2d 703 (7th Cir.1982), cert. den. 460 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 1801 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 ; Miller v. Hartwood Apts.
cited
Cited "see"
Cynthia B. Gorin v. Elton S. Osborne, Jr., M.D.
Accord, Unger v. Consolidated Foods Corp., 693 F.2d 703, 706 (7th Cir. 1982), cert. denied 460 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 1801 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Vaughn v. State
See Stewart v. State, 420 So.2d 862 (Fla.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1103 , 103 S.Ct. 1802 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 (1983); Bell v. State, 394 So.2d 979 (Fla. 1981).
cited
Cited "see"
David HICKMAN, Appellant, v. ELECTRONIC KEYBOARDING, INC., Appellee
See Unger v. Consolidated Foods Corp., 693 F.2d 703 , 710 n. 11 (7th Cir.1982), cert, denied, 460 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 1801 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 ; — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 549 , 78 L.Ed.2d 723 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Morton v. State
See Stewart v. State, 420 So.2d 862 (Fla. 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1103 , 103 S.Ct. 1802 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 (1983); Henderson v. State, 429 So.2d 1284 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Lewis v. State, 411 So.2d 880 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), rev. denied, 418 So.2d 1279 (Fla. 1982); Leary v. State, 406 So.2d 1222 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Gibson v. State, 403 So.2d 1019 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), rev. denied, 436 So.2d 32 (Fla. 1983); McMurtroy v. State, 400 So.2d 547 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 408 So.2d 1094 (Fla. 1981); Williams v. State, 400 So.2d 542 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1149 , 103 S.Ct. 793 , 74 …
discussed
Cited "see"
33 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1476, 33 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1816, 33 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,977 Wayne Wakeen, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Hoffman House, Inc., Hoffman House Restaurants, Inc., and the Pillsbury Company
Kremer, 456 U.S. at 481 , 102 S.Ct. at 1897 ; accord Unger v. Consolidated Foods Corp., 693 F.2d 703 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 1801 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 (1983). 11 Wakeen does not dispute that Wisconsin courts would accord the Dane County Circuit Court decision preclusive effect, 4 or that the Wisconsin proceedings satisfy due process requirements.
cited
Cited "see"
Wakeen v. Hoffman House, Inc.
Kremer, 456 U.S. at 481 , 102 S.Ct. at 1897 ; accord Unger v. Consolidated Foods Corp., 693 F.2d 703 (7th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, -U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 1801 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
K. K. v. State
See, e.g., Stewart v. State, 420 So.2d 862 (Fla.1982), cert denied, 460 U.S. 1103 , 103 S.Ct. 1802 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 (1983); Pitts v. State, 185 So.2d 164 (Fla.1966).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
KK v. State
See, e.g., Stewart v. State, 420 So.2d 862 (Fla.1982), cert denied, 460 U.S. 1103 , 103 S.Ct. 1802 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 (1983); Pitts v. State, 185 So.2d 164 (Fla.1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dunn v. HOVIC
Here, the district court concluded that the remarks about corporate lies “are not improper in a summation regarding punitive damages,” Dunn v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass, 774 F.Supp. 929, 949 , relying on the trial court’s statement in Herman that “[i]n attempting to convince a jury that a defendant’s conduct was outrageous and should be punished, an advocate must go beyond the kind of argument necessary to establish ordinary negligence.” 379 F.Supp. 1268, 1276 (D.V.I.1974) (footnote omitted), aff'd, 524 F.2d 767 (3d Cir.1975); see also Arnold v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 681 F.2d 186…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William Dunn Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp. v. Hovic Amerada Hess Corp. Keene Corporation v. The Litwin Corporation Litwin Panamerican Corp. Borinquen Insulation Co. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation
Co., 459 F.2d 468, 470 (3d Cir.1972), (trial judge has broad discretion in determining whether counsel's closing remarks were proper). 31 Here, the district court concluded that the remarks about corporate lies "are not improper in a summation regarding punitive damages," Dunn v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass, 774 F.Supp. 929, 949 , relying on the trial court's statement in Herman that "[i]n attempting to convince a jury that a defendant's conduct was outrageous and should be punished, an advocate must go beyond the kind of argument necessary to establish ordinary negligence." 379 F.Supp. 1268, 127…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John E. Johnson and H/w Ann Marie Johnson v. The Celotex Corporation, Owens-Illinois, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Arnold v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 681 F.2d 186 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 1801 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 (1983); Kershaw v. Sterling Drug, Inc., 415 F.2d 1009 (5th Cir.1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert Buckhalter v. Pepsi-Cola General Bottlers, Inc., Roger Thomas Kiekhofer, & Robert Friend
See, e.g., Unger v. Consolidated Foods Corp., 693 F.2d 703, 705-06 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 1801 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 (1983) (judicial proceedings of the Illinois FEPC satisfy due process requirements).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eduardo P. TRUJILLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, Defendant-Appellee
See also Unger v. Consolidated Foods Corp., 693 F.2d 703 , 710 n. 11 (7th Cir.1982) (questioning precedential value of Smouse and Gunther after Kremer because “it should be immaterial whether [the] plaintiff or defendant initiated the state court review”), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 1801 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert Buckhalter v. Pepsi-Cola General Bottlers, Inc., Roger Thomas Kiekhofer, & Robert Friend
See, e.g., Unger v. Consolidated Foods Corp., 693 F.2d 703, 705-06 (7th Cir.1982), cert denied, 460 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 1801 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 (1983) (judicial proceedings of the Illinois FEPC satisfy due process requirements).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wright v. State
See, e.g., Stewart v. State, 420 So.2d 862 (Fla.1982), ce rt. denied, 460 U.S. 1103 , 103 S.Ct. 1802 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 (1983); Booker v. State, 397 So.2d 910 (Fla.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 957 , 102 S.Ct. 493 , 70 L.Ed.2d 261 (1981); King v. State, 390 So.2d 315 (Fla.1980), ce rt. denied, 450 U.S. 989 , 101 S.Ct. 1529 , 67 L.Ed.2d 825 (1981), receded from on other grounds, Strickland v. State, 437 So.2d 150 (Fla.1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wright v. State
See, e.g., Stewart v. State, 420 So.2d 862 (Fla. 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1103 , 103 S.Ct. 1802 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 (1983); Booker v. State, 397 So.2d 910 (Fla.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 957 , 102 S.Ct. 493 , 70 L.Ed.2d 261 (1981); King v. State, 390 So.2d 315 (Fla. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 989 , 101 S.Ct. 1529 , 67 L.Ed.2d 825 (1981), receded from on other grounds, Strickland v. State, 437 So.2d 150 (Fla. 1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Felts v. Radio Distributing Co., Inc.
See also Unger v. Consolidated Foods Corp., 657 F.2d 909, 919 (7th Cir.1981), vacated on other grounds, 456 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 1801 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 (1982) (district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to award prejudgment interest to successful Title VII claimant).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Rembert v. State
Compare Stewart v. State, 420 So.2d 862 (Fla. 1982), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 103 S.Ct. 1802 , 76 L.Ed.2d 366 (1983), and Scott v. State, 411 So.2d 866 (Fla. 1982), with the facts of this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 82-1177.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 18, 1983.
Cited by 100 opinions | Published
Citer courts: District Court of Appeal of Fl… (1)
C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of petitioners to defer consideration of the petition for writ of certiorari denied. Certiorari denied.