United States ex rel. Seeman v. Mulligan, 292 U.S. 654 (1934). · Go Syfert
United States ex rel. Seeman v. Mulligan, 292 U.S. 654 (1934). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In the Matter of Black Ranches, Inc., a Nebraska Corporation, Debtor. Roe R. Black, Avis C. Black, Roe C. Black, Black Ranches, Inc., a Corporation, Debtor, and Thomas Hart Fisher v. Anna C. Brando as Administratrix of the Estate of Marlon Brando, Sr., Andmarlon Brando, Jr., Marlon Brando, Jr. v. Roe R. Black, Avis C. Black, Roe C. Black, Fred M. Nicholson, Doing Businessas Lavernia Feed and Grain, R. D. Brown, R. A. Culpepper and G. W. Parker, Aco-Partnership, Doing Business as Veterinary Service Institute, Black Ranches, Inc., Acorporation, and Thomas Hart Fisher (ca8, 1966-05-12)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" In the Matter of Black Ranches, Inc., a Nebraska Corporation, Debtor. Roe R. Black, Avis C. Black, Roe C. Black, Black Ranches, Inc., a Corporation, Debtor, and Thomas Hart Fisher v. Anna C. Brando as Administratrix of the Estate of Marlon Brando, Sr., Andmarlon Brando, Jr., Marlon Brando, Jr. v. Roe R. Black, Avis C. Black, Roe C. Black, Fred M. Nicholson, Doing Businessas Lavernia Feed and Grain, R. D. Brown, R. A. Culpepper and G. W. Parker, Aco-Partnership, Doing Business as Veterinary Service Institute, Black Ranches, Inc., Acorporation, and Thomas Hart Fisher
8th Cir. · 1966 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Howell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 69 F.2d 447, 451 (8 Cir. 1934), cert. denied, 292 U.S. 654 , 56 S.Ct. 864 , 78 L.Ed. 1503 . 59 We are mindful of appellants' submission that (a) the guaranty agreement did not provide for subrogation; (b) Brando, Jr. was a mere volunteer; and (c) Brando 'arranged the Penny Poke-Brando guaranty to further the Brando-Cobbey fraudulent scheme or 'project' to fleece debtor of its property'.
cited Cited "see" Black v. Brando
8th Cir. · 1966 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Howell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 69 F.2d 447, 451 (8 Cir. 1934), cert. denied, 292 U.S. 654 , 54 S.Ct. 864 , 78 L.Ed. 1503 .
discussed Cited "see" Richards v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
9th Cir. · 1936 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tricou v. Helvering (C.C.A.9) 68 F.(2d) 280 , certiorari denied 292 U.S. 655 , 54 S.Ct. 865 , 78 L.Ed. 1503 , and rehearing denied 293 U.S. 629 , 55 S.Ct. 67 , 79 L.Ed. 715 , and Winnett v. Helvering (C.C.A.9) 68 F.(2d) 614 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States ex rel. Seeman
v.
Mulligan, U.S. Marshal
No. 1023.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 4, 1934.
292 U.S. 654
Mr. Ellsworth C. Alvord for petitioner. Solicitor General Biggs and Messrs. Harry S. Ridgely and W. Marvin Smith for respondent.
Cited by 14 opinions  |  Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.