green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.5 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“The primary duty to so classify and report as to the nature and amount of disbursements rested on defendant.”
Treatment trajectory · 1950 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1950
1988
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Navajo Tribe of Indians v. United States
the primary duty to so classify and report as to the nature and amount of disbursements rested on defendant.
discussed
Cited "see"
John S. Clark Co., Inc. v. Travelers Indem. Co. of Ill.
(2×)
See Updike v. West, 172 F.2d 663, 665 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 337 U.S. 908 , 69 S.Ct. 1050 , 93 L.Ed. 1720 (1949); see also Burns v. W.S.
discussed
Cited "see"
Petra International Banking Corp. v. First American Bank
Here, the existing written Agreements contradict the assertion of a fiduciary relationship. "[Wjhen a contract is not in its nature essentially fiduciary, a trust, to be *1138 established, must be expressly reposed or necessarily implied." Id.; see also Vargas v. Esquire, 166 F.2d 651, 652-53 (7th Cir.) (applying Illinois law and holding that where fiduciary relationship does not exist as a matter of law, proof of such "must be clear, convincing, and so strong as to lead to but one possible conclusion”), cert. denied, 335 U.S. 813 , 69 S.Ct. 29 , 93 L.Ed. 368 (1948); accord Lawrence v. Muter…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Medlin, B.A. McFarland and B.E. McFarland
(2×)
Accord Updike v. West, 172 F.2d 663, 666 (10th Cir.1949), cert. denied, 337 U.S. 908 , 69 S.Ct. 1050 , 93 L.Ed. 1720 ; Fed.R.Civ.P. 67; 28 U.S.C. §§ 2041 , 2042.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sioux Tribe of Indians v. United States
See Sioux Tribe v. United States, 105 Ct.Cl. 725 , 794, 64 F.Supp. 312, 327 (1946), vacated and remanded, 329 U.S. 685 (1946) aff'd on reh’g, 112 Ct.Cl. 50 , 78 F.Supp. 793 (1948), cert. denied, 337 U.S. 908 , 69 S.Ct. 1045 , 93 L.Ed. 1720 (1949).
cited
Cited "see"
Shillman v. Hobstetter
See Lawrence v. Muter Co., 171 F. 2d 380 (7th Cir. 1948) cert. den. 337 U. S. 907 , 69 S. Ct. 1049 , 93 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mendrano v. Smith
(2×)
See also, De War v. Hunter, 170 F.2d 993, 997 (10th Cir.1948), cert. denied, 337 U.S. 908 , 69 S.Ct. 1048 , 93 L.Ed. 1720 , reh. denied, 337 U.S. 934 , 69 S.Ct. 1493 , 93 L.Ed. 1720 (1949) (“[W]hat constitutes due process in a trial by a military tribunal is gauged by the principles of military law enacted by the Congress, provided the accused is given due notice of the charge against him, a fair opportunity to prepare his defense, and his guilt is adjudicated by a competent tribunal”) (footnote omitted).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mendrano v. Smith
(2×)
See also, De War v. Hunter, 170 F.2d 993, 997 (10th Cir.1948), cert. denied, 337 U.S. 908 , 69 S.Ct. 1048 , 93 L.Ed. 1720 , reh. denied, 337 U.S. 934 , 69 S.Ct. 1493 , 93 L.Ed. 1720 (1949) ("[W]hat constitutes due process in a trial by a military tribunal is gauged by the principles of military law enacted by the Congress, provided the accused is given due notice of the charge against him, a fair opportunity to prepare his defense, and his guilt is adjudicated by a competent tribunal") (footnote omitted).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harbor Towing Corp.
v.
Parker
v.
Parker
No. 702.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 16, 1949.
John H. Skeen for petitioner., George W. P. Whip for Parker, respondent.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Claims (1)
[*907] Certiorari denied.
George W. P. Whip for Parker, respondent.