green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
5.9 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1991 ·
…by choosing the word 'may,' rather than 'shall,' 'must,' or other mandatory language, congress allowed the secretary to exercise discretion in deciding whether regulations were needed to effectuate the statute.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Plaza Health Laboratories, Inc. v. Perales
But see Patchogue Nursing Center v. Bowen, 797 F.2d 1137, 1145 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 873 , 93 L.Ed.2d 828 (1987); Okoli v. N.Y.S.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Perales v. Sullivan
by choosing the word 'may,' rather than 'shall,' 'must,' or other mandatory language, congress allowed the secretary to exercise discretion in deciding whether regulations were needed to effectuate the statute.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Perales v. Sullivan
by choosing the word 'may,' rather than 'shall,' 'must,' or other mandatory language, congress allowed the secretary to exercise discretion in deciding whether regulations were needed to effectuate the statute.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Crude Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Energy Guidelines Court Decision 1981-84 ¶ 26,490 at 29,558 n. 6 (N.D.Okla.1984), aff'd, 795 F.2d 1040 (Temp.Emer.Ct.App.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 873 , 93 L.Ed.2d 828 *239 (1987), in which the Court indicated that it was not necessary to find a violation of another regulation in order to find a violation of § 205.202. 62 FERC ¶ 63,026 (noting that the Sutton decision was binding on FERC).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. LTV Corp.
Ct. 873, 93 L.Ed.2d 828 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Flamingo Fishing Corp. v. United States
See Texas State Comm’n for the Blind v. United States, 796 F.2d 400, 406 (Fed.Cir.1986), cert, denied, 479 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 874 , 93 L.Ed.2d 828 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
City of New York v. Watkins
See United States v. Sutton, 795 F.2d 1040, 1061 (Temp.Emer.Ct.App.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 873 , 93 L.Ed.2d 828 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Altman v. United States
See United States v. Sutton, 795 F.2d 1040, 1049-1050 (Em.App.1986) cert. denied 479 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 873 , 93 L.Ed.2d 828 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Committee of Blind Vendors v. District of Columbia
See Texas State Comm’n for the Blind v. United States, 796 F.2d 400 (Fed.Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 874 , 93 L.Ed.2d 828 (1987); Oklahoma ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rockland Medilabs, Inc. v. Perales
See Plaza Health, 878 F.2d at 582 (discussing Patchogue Nursing Ctr. v. Bowen, 797 F.2d 1137 , 1144-45 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 873 , 93 L.Ed.2d 828 (1987) and Case v. Weinberger, 523 F.2d 602, 606, 609-10 (2d Cir.1975)).
cited
Cited "see"
Good Neighbor Care Centers, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services
See Patchogue Nursing Center v. Bowen, 797 F.2d 1137, 1144-45 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 873 , 93 L.Ed.2d 828 (1987); Case v. Weinberger, 523 F.2d 602, 606 (2d Cir.1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Telerate Systems, Inc. v. Caro
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION In this circuit, the standard for the issuance of a preliminary injunction is a showing of “(a) irreparable harm and (b) either (1) likelihood of success on the merits or (2) sufficiently serious question going to the merits to make them a fair ground for litigation and a balance of hardships tipping decidedly toward the party requesting the preliminary injunctive relief.” Kaplan v. Board of Educ., 759 F.2d 256 , 259 (2d Cir.1985); accord Patchogue Nursing Center v. Bowen, 797 F.2d 1137, 1141 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Laverpool v. New York City Transit Authority
In Mathews the Supreme Court stated that the Court should consider: “First, the private interest that will be affected by the official action; second, the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; and finally, the Government’s interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirement would entail” (Mathews, supra, 424 U.S. at p. 335 , 96 S.Ct. at 903 ; see also Patchogue Nursing Center v.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
J.M. Huber Corp. v. United States
The Federal Circuit has applied in tax cases the Supreme Court’s direction in Caminetti v. United States, 242 U.S. 470 , 37 S.Ct. 192 , 61 L.Ed. 442 (1917), that “ ‘[wjhere the language is plain and admits of no more than one meaning the duty of interpretation does not arise and the rules which are to aid doubtful meanings need no discussion.’ ” Henry v. United States, 793 F.2d 289, 293 (Fed.Cir.1986); see also Texas State Comm’n for the Blind v. United States, 796 F.2d 400, 406 (Fed.Cir.1986) (quoting United States v. Turkette, 452 U.S. 576, 580 , 101 S.Ct. 2524, 2527 , 69 L.Ed.2d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Continental Training Services, Inc. v. Cavazos
See, e.g., Patchogue Nursing Center v. Bowen, 797 F.2d 1137, 1144-45 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1030 , 107 S.Ct. 873 , 93 L.Ed. 2d 828 (1987); Ram v. Heckler, 792 F.2d 444, 447 (4th Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Neptune Mutual Ass'n v. United States
The Federal Circuit has applied in tax cases the Supreme Court’s direction in Caminetti v. United States, 242 U.S. 470 , 37 S.Ct. 192 , 61 L.Ed. 442 (1917), that “ ‘[wjhere the language is plain and admits of no more than one meaning the duty of interpretation does not arise and the rules which are to aid doubtful meanings need no discussion.’ ” Henry v. United States, 793 F.2d 289, 293 (Fed.Cir.1986); see also Texas State Comm’n for the Blind v. United States, 796 F.2d 400, 406 (Fed.Cir.1986), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 874 , 93 L.Ed.2d 828 (1987) (quoting United States v…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Department of Energy v. Seneca Oil Co. (In re Seneca Oil Co.)
See also, United States v. Sutton, No. 82-C-1069-B, slip, op. at 32 (Northern District of Oklahoma, Sept. 14, 1984), affirmed, 795 F.2d 1040 (TECA 1986), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 873 , 93 L.Ed.2d 828 (1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Asher
v.
Washington
v.
Washington
No. 86-391.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 1987.
Cited by 74 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (2)
Ct. App. Wash. Certiorari denied.