United Metal Prods. Corp. v. Nat'l Bank, 483 U.S. 1019 (1987). · Go Syfert
Search
United Metal Prods. Corp. v. Nat'l Bank, 483 U.S. 1019 (1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
40 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 20 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Wildermuth v. State (md, 1987-09-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Wildermuth v. State
Md. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See, State v. Coy, 397 N.W.2d 730, 733-734 (Iowa 1986), appeal filed April 15, 1987, prob. juris noted, — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 3260 , 97 L.Ed.2d 760 (1987); Commonwealth v. Willis, 716 S.W.2d 224, 227-231 (Ky.1986); Appeal in Pinal County Juvenile Action, 147 Ariz. 302, 304-306 , 709 P.2d 1361, 1363-1364 (App.1985); People v. Johnson, 146 Ill.App.3d 640, 646-52 , 100 Ill.Dec. 330, 334-337 , 497 N.E.2d 308, 312-315 (1986); State v. Daniels, 484 So.2d 941, 944 (La.Ct.App.1986); People v. Algarin, 129 Misc.2d 1016, 1021 , 498 N.Y.S.2d 977, 981 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1986) (requirement of “face to face” co…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." William Tollie Lowrance v. George Pflueger
7th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Donta v. Hooper, 774 F.2d 716, 721 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1019 , 107 S.Ct. 3261 , 97 L.Ed.2d 760 (1987) (Ohio police entitled to qualified immunity for arrest based upon a teletype from Kentucky state police); Whiteley v. Warden, 401 U.S. 560, 568 , 91 S.Ct. 1031, 1037 , 28 L.Ed.2d 306 (1971) (“[P]olice officers called upon to aid other officers in executing arrest warrants are entitled to assume that the officers requesting aid offered the magistrate the information requisite to support an independent judicial assessment of probable cause.”) (dicta).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United Metal Products Corp.
v.
National Bank of Detroit
No. 86-1786.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 26, 1987.
483 U.S. 1019
Cited by 37 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 6th Cir. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.