A.L. Williams & Assocs. Massachusetts Indem. & Life Ins. Co., Counter-Defendants v. Randy Stelk Timothy Hunter Willard H. Colson, Jr., D/B/A Mid-Am. Investors, Counter-Claimants, Investors Life Ins. Co. of Nebraska, Amerishare Investors, Inc., A.L. Williams & Assocs., Inc., Massachusetts Indem. & Life Ins. Co., Counter-Defendants v. Randy Stelk, Timothy Hunter, Counter-Claimants, Willard H. Colson, Jr., D/B/A Mid-Am. Investors, Counter-Claimant, Investors Life Ins. Co. of Nebraska, Counter-Defendant, Amerishare Investors, Inc., Counter-Defendant, 984 F.2d 391 (11th Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
A.L. Williams & Assocs. Massachusetts Indem. & Life Ins. Co., Counter-Defendants v. Randy Stelk Timothy Hunter Willard H. Colson, Jr., D/B/A Mid-Am. Investors, Counter-Claimants, Investors Life Ins. Co. of Nebraska, Amerishare Investors, Inc., A.L. Williams & Assocs., Inc., Massachusetts Indem. & Life Ins. Co., Counter-Defendants v. Randy Stelk, Timothy Hunter, Counter-Claimants, Willard H. Colson, Jr., D/B/A Mid-Am. Investors, Counter-Claimant, Investors Life Ins. Co. of Nebraska, Counter-Defendant, Amerishare Investors, Inc., Counter-Defendant, 984 F.2d 391 (11th Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
A.L. Williams & Associates Massachusetts Indemnity and Life Insurance Company, Counter-Defendants
v.
Randy Stelk Timothy Hunter Willard H. Colson, Jr., D/B/A Mid-American Investors, Counter-Claimants, Investors Life Insurance Company of Nebraska, Amerishare Investors, Inc., A.L. Williams & Associates, Inc., Massachusetts Indemnity and Life Insurance Company, Counter-Defendants v. Randy Stelk, Timothy Hunter, Counter-Claimants, Willard H. Colson, Jr., D/B/A Mid-American Investors, Counter-Claimant, Investors Life Insurance Company of Nebraska, Counter-Defendant, Amerishare Investors, Inc., Counter-Defendant
90-8855.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Feb 8, 1993.
984 F.2d 391
Published

984 F.2d 391

8 IER Cases 480

A.L. WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES; Massachusetts Indemnity and
Life Insurance Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
Counter-Defendants,
v.
Randy STELK; Timothy Hunter; Willard H. Colson, Jr., d/b/a
Mid-American Investors, Defendants-Appellants,
Counter-Claimants,
Investors Life Insurance Company of Nebraska, Defendant,
Amerishare Investors, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.
A.L. WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES, INC., Massachusetts Indemnity
and Life Insurance Company, Plaintiffs,
Counter-Defendants, Appellees,
v.
Randy STELK, Timothy Hunter, Defendants, Counter-Claimants, Appellants,
Willard H. Colson, Jr., d/b/a Mid-American Investors,
Defendant, Counter-Claimant, Appellant,
Investors Life Insurance Company of Nebraska, Defendant,
Counter-Defendant,
Amerishare Investors, Inc., Defendant, Counter-Defendant, Appellant.

Nos. 89-8765, 90-8855.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

Feb. 8, 1993.

Irwin W. Stolz, Jr., Seaton D. Purdom, Atlanta, GA, for Colsons.

C.B. Rogers, Rogers & Hardin, Phillip S. McKinney, Peter W. Schneider, Atlanta, GA, for Stelk, Hunter and Amerishare.

Sidney O. Smith, Jr., Oscar N. Persons, Anne S. Rampacek, Alston & Bird, Atlanta, GA, for appellee in No. 89-8765.

Jeffrey W. Kelley, Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, Atlanta, GA, for Investor Life Ins. Co.

James D. Meadows, Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, Atlanta, GA, amicus curiae.

Seaton D. Purdom, Gambrell, Clarke, Anderson & Stolz, Irwin Stolz, C.B. Rogers, Rogers & Hardin, Phillip S. McKinney, Peter W. Schneider, Atlanta, GA, for appellant in No. 90-8855.

Sidney O. Smith, Jr., Anne S. Rampacek, Oscar N. Persons, Alston & Bird, Jeffrey W. Kelley, Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, Atlanta, GA, for appellees in No. 90-8855.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Robert L. Vining, Jr., Judge.

Before COX and DUBINA, Circuit Judges, and GODBOLD, Senior Circuit Judge.

BY THE COURT:

1

Appellants' and appellees' joint motion to dismiss the appeal and to vacate the May 18, 1992 (and January 14, 1993) opinions is GRANTED. The May 18, 1992 panel opinion, published at 960 F.2d 942 (11th Cir.1992), and the January 14, 1993 (slip. page 784) opinions are VACATED. The judgment of the district court is VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the district court with instruction that the case be dismissed. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).