green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.3 score
“a contract is voidable at the option of the government when the official who made the agreement lacked actual authority to bind the government”
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jain v. United States
a contract is voidable at the option of the government when the official who made the agreement lacked actual authority to bind the government
discussed
Cited "see"
Ervin & Associates, Inc. v. United States
See generally Janowsky v. United States, 989 F.2d 1203 , 1993 WL 36863 (Fed.Cir.1993) (table); Institut Pasteur, 814 F.2d 624 ; Coastal Corp., 713 F.2d 728 ; Airborne Data, Inc. v. United States, 702 F.2d 1350 (Fed.Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sean Donahue v. Department of Labor
The listed “personnel actions” include the following: (1) an appointment; (2) a promotion; (3) an action under 5 U.S.C. chapter 75 or other disciplinary or corrective action; (4) a detail, transfer, or reassignment; (5) a reinstatement; (6) a restoration; (7) a reemployment; (8) a performance evaluation under 5 U.S.C. chapter 43 or under tile 38; (9) a decision concerning pay, benefits, or awards, or concerning education or training if the education or training may reasonably be expected to lead to an appointment, promotion, performance evaluation, or other action described in 5 U.S.C. § …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Calvin J. Weber
v.
Merit Systems Protection Board
v.
Merit Systems Protection Board
92-3548.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Feb 12, 1993.
Unpublished
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Calvin J. WEBER, Petitioner,
v.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.
No. 92-3548.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Feb. 12, 1993.
Before PAULINE NEWMAN, MAYER and MICHEL, Circuit Judges.
Judgment
PER CURIAM.
1
AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.