Cluster 112852

green · 831 citation events across 98 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 50

green Russell Forde Hornor v. Upper Freehold Regional Board of Education (2026)

Quote Authority · N.J. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Grp., 508 U.S. 10, 18 (1993) (“[I]n construing statutes, the use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section.”); accord Kennedy v. Weichert Co., 257 N.J. 290 , 310 (2024).

“[I]n construing statutes, the use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section.”

green Harmonizing the Professional Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 and Section 214 o… (2026)

Quote Authority · OLC · signal: see also · 4 citations in this opinion

“Notwithstanding” clauses, or non obstante clauses, have long been used “to specify the degree to which a new statute was meant to repeal older, potentially conflicting statutes in the same field.” PLIVA, 564 U.S. at 621–22 (plurality opinion); see also Cisneros, 508 U.S. at 18 (“[A] clearer statement” of congressional intent “to supersede all other laws” is “difficult to imagine.”).

“[A] clearer statement” of congressional intent “to supersede all other laws” is “difficult to imagine.”

green Estate of Michael R. Monihan and Holly P. Monihan v. Director, Division of Taxation (2026)

Quote Authority · N.J. Tax Ct. · 6 citations in this opinion

See e.g., L.R.B. v. SW Gen., Inc., 580 U.S. 288, 302 (2017) (“[a] ‘notwithstanding’ clause . . . shows which of two or more provisions prevails in the event of a conflict.”); Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Grp., 508 U.S. 10, 18 (1993) (“notwithstanding language” has been interpreted to “supersede all other laws” since “[a] clearer statement is difficult to imagine.”); State v. D.A., 191 N.J. 158, 164 (2007) (“If the plain language leads to a clear and unambiguous result, then 18 t…

“notwithstanding language” has been interpreted to “supersede all other laws” since “[a] clearer statement is difficult to imagine.”

green Megan McDermott v. Guaranteed Rate, Inc. (2025)

Quote Authority · N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · signal: see also

Johnson, 657 F. Supp. 3d at 560- 61; see also Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Grp., 508 U.S. 10, 18 (1993) ("As we have noted previously in construing statutes, the use of such a 'notwithstanding' clause clearly signals the drafter's intention that the provisions of the 'notwithstanding' section override conflicting provisions of any other section.").

"As we have noted previously in construing statutes, the use of such a 'notwithstanding' clause clearly signals the drafter's intention that the provisions of the 'notwithstanding' section override conflicting provisions of any other section."

green Megan McDermott v. Guaranteed Rate, Inc. (2025)

Quote Authority · N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · signal: see also

green In re: AH Liquidation, Inc. (2025)

Quote Authority · D. Del. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Grp., 508 U.S. 10, 18 (1993) (“[T]he use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section.”).

“[T]he use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section.”

green Richardson v. United States (2024)

Quote Authority · Fed. Cir. · signal: cf.

Cf. Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Grp., 508 U.S. 10, 18 (1993) (“[T]he use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ sec- tion override conflicting provisions of any other section.”) (emphasis added).

“[T]he use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ sec- tion override conflicting provisions of any other section.”

green United States v. Joseph (2024)

Quote Authority · 5th Cir. · signal: cf.

Cf. Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Grp., 508 U.S. 10, 18 (1993) (“[T]he use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section.”).

green United States v. Joseph (2024)

Quote Authority · 5th Cir. · signal: cf.

Cf. Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Grp., 508 U.S. 10, 18 (1993) (“[T]he use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section.”).

green Johnston v. Palomar Specialty Insurance Company (2023)

Quote Authority · S.D. Tex. · signal: see

See generally Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Grp., 508 U.S. 10, 18 (1993) (“[I]n construing statutes, the use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter's intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section.”).

“[I]n construing statutes, the use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter's intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section.”

green Okonowski v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London (2023)

Quote Authority · E.D. Mich.

Here, the Policy explicitly provides that the process under the Grievance Procedure section applies “[n]otwithstanding any other item set forth herein [i.e., in the Policy].” (ECF No. 10-2, PageID.271.) “[T]he use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter's intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section.” Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Grp., 508 U.S. 10, 18 (1993).

“[T]he term ‘notwithstanding’ functions in its normal supplanting way: it simply excludes application of the referenced section.”

green Anna Galaza v. Alejandro Mayorkas (2023)

Quote Authority · 9th Cir. · signal: see

green Use of the HEROES Act of 2003 to Cancel the Principal Amounts of Student Loans (2022)

Quote Authority · OLC · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

In statutes, the term “notwithstanding” “shows which provision prevails in the event of a clash.” NLRB v. SW Gen., Inc., 137 S. Ct. 929, 939 (2017) (quotation marks omitted); see Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Grp., 508 U.S. 10, 18 (1993) (“the use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clear- ly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstand- ing’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section”).

“the use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clear- ly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstand- ing’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section”

green Use of the HEROES Act of 2003 to Cancel the Principal Amounts of Student Loans (2022)

Quote Authority · OLC · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

green Julian Depot Miami, LLC v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (2020)

Quote Authority · 11th Cir.

Ct. App. 2018) (holding that a “notwithstanding” clause “supersede[d]” any contrary language in the contract); Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Grp., 508 U.S. 10, 18 (1993) (“[T]he use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section.”); Scalia & Garner, Reading Law § 13, at 127 (“[T]he catch-all notwithstanding is a fail-safe way of ensuring that the c…

green Plumb v. Casey (2014)

Quote Authority · Mass.

L. c. 104A, § 2 (b), is intended in a directive sense. 9 See Attorney Gen. v. Commissioner of Ins., 450 Mass. 311, 319 (2008), quoting Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Group, 508 U.S. 10, 18 (1993) (“The use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section *598 override conflicting provisions of any other section”).

“The use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section *598 override conflicting provisions of any other section”

green Disposition of Proceeds From the Sale of Real Property Acquired With Money From the Social Security Trust Fun… (2010)

Quote Authority · OLC

As a general rule, “the use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section.” Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Grp., 508 U.S. 10, 18 (1993); see also, e.g., Memorandum for Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service, from Daniel L.

“Tax Levies”

green Recording Ind. Assoc v. Charter (2005)

Quote Authority · 8th Cir. · signal: see also

Auth. ex rel City of Minneapolis, 168 F.3d 1069, 1075 (8th Cir. 1999); see also Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Group, 508 U.S. 10, 18 (1993) ( "As we have noted previously in construing statutes, the use of such a 'notwithstanding' clause clearly signals the drafter's intention that the provisions of the 'notwithstanding' section override the conflicting provisions of any other section.").

green Villa v. United States (1996)

Quote Authority · Fed. Cl. · signal: see · 4 citations in this opinion

See Alpine Ridge, 508 U.S. at 21 , 113 S.Ct. at 1904-05 (“we observe that [Section 1.8d] expressly assigns to ‘the Government’ the determination of whether there exist material differences between the rents charged for assisted and comparable unassisted units”); National Leased Housing Ass’n v. United States, 32 Fed.Cl. 762, 763 (1995); Park Village Apts. v. United States, 32 Fed.Cl. 441, 446-47 (1994).

“we observe that [Section 1.8d] expressly assigns to ‘the Government’ the determination of whether there exist material differences between the rents charged for assisted and comparable unassisted units”

green Stroud v. THI of South Carolina at Greenville (2024)

Quote Authority · S.C. Ct. App. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion

See Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Grp., 508 U.S. 10, 18 , 113 S. Ct. 1898, 1903 , 123 L.

"[T]he use of such a 'notwithstanding' clause clearly signals the drafter's intention that the provisions of the 'notwithstanding' section override conflicting provisions of any other section."

green Cipla Ltd. v. Amgen Inc. (2019)

Quote Authority · D. Del. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion

See Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Grp. , 508 U.S. 10 , 18, 113 S.Ct. 1898 , 123 L.Ed.2d 572 (1993) ("[T]he use of such a 'notwithstanding' clause clearly signals the drafter's intention that the provisions of the 'notwithstanding' section override conflicting provisions of any other section.").

"[T]he use of such a 'notwithstanding' clause clearly signals the drafter's intention that the provisions of the 'notwithstanding' section override conflicting provisions of any other section."

green Regions Bank v. BP P.L.C. (2016)

Quote Authority · Ala. · 3 citations in this opinion

To the extent that the language-of Section 1.3.1.11 causes any confusion as to whether an “otherwise excluded industry]” is a part of the economic class, that confusion is cleared up by- Section 2.1, which begins: “Notwithstanding the above, the following individuals and Entities ... are excluded from the Economic Class.” See Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Grp., 508 U.S. 10, 18 , 113 S.Ct. 1898 , 123 L.Ed.2d 572 (1993) (“[T]he use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals…

“[T]he use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding* section override conflicting provisions of any other section.”

green United States v. Ghassan Elashi (2015)

Quote Authority · 5th Cir. · signal: cf. · 3 citations in this opinion

This court has interpreted this “notwithstanding” clause as “signalling] a clear Congressional intent to override conflicting federal law.” DeCay, 620 F.3d at 540; cf. Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Grp., 508 U.S. 10, 18 , 113 S.Ct. 1898 , 123 L.Ed.2d 572 (1993) (“[T]he use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section.”); United States v. Novak, 4…

green Ohio Neighborhood Fin., Inc. v. Scott (Slip Opinion) (2014)

Quote Authority · Ohio · 6 citations in this opinion

Bd. of Edn., 170 Ohio St. 415 , 422, 165 N.E.2d 918 (1960); Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Group, 508 U.S. 10, 18 , 113 S.Ct. 1898 , 123 L.Ed.2d 572 (1993) (“a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section”).

“a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section”

green Fleischer Studios, Inc. v. AVELA, INC. (2011)

Quote Authority · 9th Cir. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion

See Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Grp., 508 U.S. 10, 18 , 113 S.Ct. 1898 , 123 L.Ed.2d 572 (1993) ("[T]he use of such a `notwithstanding' clause clearly signals the drafter's intention that the provisions of the `notwithstanding' section override conflicting provisions of any other section").

"[T]he use of such a `notwithstanding' clause clearly signals the drafter's intention that the provisions of the `notwithstanding' section override conflicting provisions of any other section"

green Warner v. CitiFinancial, Inc. (In Re Warner) (2011)

Quote Authority · Bankr. D. Vt. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion

See Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Group, 508 U.S. 10, 18 , 113 S.Ct. 1898, 1903 , 123 L.Ed.2d 572 (1993) (“[a]s we have noted previously in construing statutes, the use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section.”).

“[a]s we have noted previously in construing statutes, the use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section.”

green Fleischer Studios, Inc. v. A.V.E.L.A., Inc. (2011)

Quote Authority · 9th Cir. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion

See Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Grp., 508 U.S. 10, 17 , 113 S.Ct. 1898 , 123 L.Ed.2d 572 (1993) (“[T]he use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section”).

green Fleischer Studios, Inc. v. A.V.E.L.A., Inc. (2011)

Quote Authority · 9th Cir. · signal: see · 6 citations in this opinion

See Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Grp., 508 U.S. 10, 17 , 113 S.Ct. 1898 , 123 L.Ed.2d 572 (1993) ("[T]he use of such a `notwithstanding' clause clearly signals the drafter's intention that the provisions of the `notwithstanding' section override conflicting provisions of any other section").

"[T]he use of such a `notwithstanding' clause clearly signals the drafter's intention that the provisions of the `notwithstanding' section override conflicting provisions of any other section"

green United States v. Lambert (2010)

Quote Authority · 4th Cir. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion

See Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Group, 508 U.S. 10, 18 , 113 S.Ct. 1898 , 123 L.Ed.2d 572 (1993) (“[I]n construing statutes, the use of such a ‘notwithstanding1 clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding1 section override conflicting provisions of any other section.”).

“[I]n construing statutes, the use of such a ‘notwithstanding1 clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding1 section override conflicting provisions of any other section.”

green Davon Group Ltd. v. Dyer (2009)

Quote Authority · 5th Cir. · signal: see · 5 citations in this opinion

The parties clearly set forth their intent that Dyer shall have no personal liability with the following language in the contract: “provided, however, that anything in this Agreement, or in the Stock Pledge Agreement or any other agreement to which any Seller is a party to the contrary notwithstanding, Purchaser shall have no personal liability to Seller for any Indebtedness.” See Gilbert v. Evan, 822 So.2d 42, 46 (La.Ct.App.2002) (“This agreement exists ‘Notwithstanding the…

green Ocean View Towers Associates, Ltd. Partnership v. United States (2009)

Quote Authority · Fed. Cl. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Statesman, 66 Fed.Cl. at 611 (citing Cisneros, 508 U.S. at 14, 15 , 113 S.Ct. 1898 ).

“1994 Act”

green United States v. Pipkin (2008)

Quote Authority · N.D. Iowa · signal: see, e.g. · 3 citations in this opinion

See, e.g., Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Group, 508 U.S. 10, 18 , 113 S.Ct. 1898 , 123 L.Ed.2d 572 (1993) (“[I]n construing statutes, the use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section.”); see also United States v. Hyde, 497 F.3d 103, 108 (1st Cir.2007) (holding that another “notwithstanding” clause in the MVRA overrode apparently contrary stat…

green United States v. Hyde (2007)

Quote Authority · 1st Cir. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion

See Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Group, 508 U.S. 10, 18 , 113 S.Ct. 1898 , 123 L.Ed.2d 572 (1993) (“[I]n construing statutes, the use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section.”) (collecting circuit court cases).

green Pino v. Hawley (2007)

Quote Authority · W.D. Pa. · signal: see also · 3 citations in this opinion

See also Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Group, 508 U.S. 10, 18 , 113 S.Ct. 1898 , 123 L.Ed.2d 572 (1993) (“As we have noted previously in construing statutes, the use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section.”); Conyers v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 388 F.3d 1380, 1382 (C.A.Fed.2004)(“[w]e think that the ‘notwithstanding any other provisi…

“As we have noted previously in construing statutes, the use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section.”

green Orlando Food Corp. v. United States (2005)

Quote Authority · Fed. Cir. · signal: see · 6 citations in this opinion

See Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Group, 508 U.S. 10, 18 , 113 S.Ct. 1898 , 123 L.Ed.2d 572 (1993) ("As we have noted previously in construing statutes, the use of such a `notwithstanding' clause clearly signals the drafter's intention that the provisions of the `notwithstanding' section override conflicting provisions of any other section.") (citing Shomberg v. United States, 348 U.S. 540, 547-48 , 75 S.Ct. 509 , 99 L.Ed. 624 (1955)).

"As we have noted previously in construing statutes, the use of such a `notwithstanding' clause clearly signals the drafter's intention that the provisions of the `notwithstanding' section override conflicting provisions of any other section."

green United States v. Charter Communications, Inc. (2005)

Quote Authority · 8th Cir. · signal: see also · 5 citations in this opinion

Auth. ex rel City of Minneapolis, 168 F.3d 1069, 1075 (8th Cir.1999); see also Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Group, 508 U.S. 10, 18 , 113 5.Ct. 1898, 123 L.Ed.2d 572 (1993) ( “As we have noted previously in construing statutes, the use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override the conflicting provisions of any other section.”).

green Orelski v. NCS Pearson (2004)

Quote Authority · W.D. Pa. · signal: see also · 3 citations in this opinion

See also Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Group, 508 U.S. 10, 18 , 113 S.Ct. 1898 , 123 L.Ed.2d 572 (1993) (“As we have noted previously in construing statutes, the use of such a “notwithstanding” clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the “notwithstanding” section override conflicting provisions of any other section.”).

“As we have noted previously in construing statutes, the use of such a “notwithstanding” clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the “notwithstanding” section override conflicting provisions of any other section.”

green Jeffrey Campbell, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. Minneapolis Public Housing Authority,… (1999)

Quote Authority · 8th Cir. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion

See Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Group, 508 U.S. 10, 18 , 113 S.Ct. 1898 , 123 L.Ed.2d 572 (1993) ("As we have noted previously in construing statutes, the use of such a 'notwithstanding' clause clearly signals the drafter's intention that the provisions of the 'notwithstanding' section override the conflicting provisions of any other section."); Schneider v. United States, 27 F.3d 1327, 1331-32 (8th Cir.1994) (enforcing the plain language of a similar "notwithstanding" clause),…

green Campbell v. Minneapolis Public Housing Authority (1999)

Quote Authority · 8th Cir. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion

See Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Group, 508 U.S. 10, 18 , 113 S.Ct. 1898 , 123 L.Ed.2d 572 (1993) (“As we have noted previously in construing statutes, the use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override the conflicting provisions of any other section.”); Schneider v. United States, 27 F.3d 1327, 1331-32 (8th Cir.1994) (enforcing the plain language of a similar “notwithstanding” clause),…

green Masimo Corporation v. Joe E. Kiani (2026)

Rule Authority · Del. Ch.

Feb. 5, 2026) (quoting Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Gp., 508 U.S. 10, 18 (1993)). 109 Prior to § 122(18)’s enactment, the Court questioned “whether it would contravene public policy to interpret [a] forum selection provision [in an employment agreement] to apply to common law claims for breach of fiduciary duty, or whether an officer of a Delaware corporation can effectively ‘opt out’ of the practical consequences of 10 Del.

green Jackson Lehr v. Aspen Power Partners LLC (2026)

Rule Authority · Del. Ch.

Aug. 12, 2013) (“[T]he use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override [potentially] conflicting provisions of any other section.” (citing Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Gp., 508 U.S. 10, 18 (1993))). 136 Aspen Fourth LLC Agreement § 14.2(e). 137 Katell, 1993 WL 205033 , at *4 (“When there is an [alleged] inconsistency between general and specific provisions, the specific provisions ordina…

green Wilderness Workshop v. Harrell (2026)

Rule Authority · D.D.C.

Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Grp., 508 U.S. 10, 18 (1993).

green Airn Liquidation Trust Co., LLC v. Bank of America, N.A. (2025)

Rule Authority · Bankr. D.N.J.

The word “notwithstanding” demonstrates the intention “to supersede all other laws.” Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Grp., 508 U.S. 10, 18 (1993) (citations omitted).

green Status of the Refundable Portion of Certain Tax Credits as Federal Public Benefits (2025)

Rule Authority · OLC

Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Grp., 508 U.S. 10, 18 (1993) (citation omitted); see also, e.g., NLRB v. SW General, Inc., 580 U.S. 288, 299 (2017).

citation omitted

green Newark Property Association v. State of Delaware (2025)

Rule Authority · Del. Ch.

C. § 8306, which mandates that all property “shall be 193 HB242 § 1(1). 194 Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Gp., 508 U.S. 10, 18 (1993); see In re Fed.-Mogul Glob.

explaining that a federal “notwithstanding” clause preempted state law

green Joseph Simone v. Secretary of Homeland Security (2025)

Rule Authority · 11th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion

Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Grp., 508 U.S. 10, 18 (1993).

green Havlish v. Taliban; Aliganga v. Taliban (2025)

Rule Authority · 2d Cir.

Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Grp., 508 U.S. 10, 18 (1993) (internal quotation 102 marks and citation omitted). 39 Indeed, the Supreme Court has spoken in such terms of the TRIA’s own “notwithstanding” clause. 103 Our own, earlier consideration of the TRIA’s “notwithstanding” clause had been to the same effect.

internal quotation 102 marks and citation omitted

green Liberty Global v. CIR (2025)

Rule Authority · 10th Cir.

See, e.g., N.L.R.B. v. SW Gen., Inc., 580 U.S. 288, 301 (2017) (quoting ANTONIN SCALIA & BRYAN A. GARNER, READING LAW: THE INTERPRETATION OF LEGAL TEXTS 126–127 (2012)) (“In statutes, the word [notwithstanding] ‘shows which provision prevails in the event of a clash.’”); Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Grp., 508 U.S. 10, 18 (1993) (“As we have noted previously in construing statutes, the use of such a ‘notwithstanding’ clause clearly signals the 12 Appellate Case: 24-9004 Document:…

green Weinstock v. Islamic Republic of Iran (2025)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.

Courts "generally have interpreted . . . 'notwithstanding' language to supersede all other laws," as "a clearer statement is difficult to imagine." Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Grp., 508 U.S. 10, 18 (1993) (cleaned up).

cleaned up

green Triangle Montgomery Associates, LLC v. Beazer Homes, LLC (2025)

Rule Authority · D. Maryland

Sept. 10, 2013) (quoting Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Group, 508 U.S. 10, 18 (1993)).3 : Plaintiffs are surely disappointed that they are not receiving an Additional Purchase Price, and it is likely that the parties did not anticipate the moratorium imposed by Howard County that prevented Defendant from building and selling any properties within the Outside Date.