How cited: Cluster 1208675 · Go Syfert

Cluster 1208675

green · 26 citation events across 6 courts. Showing the 21 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · D.N.D.
See Halvorson v. Astrue, 500 F.3d 922, 932-33 (8th Cir. 2010); Clevinger v. Astrue, 567 F.3d 971, 975 (8th Cir. 2009).
green Fisher v. O'Malley (2024)
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
Admin., 567 F.3d 971, 976 (8th Cir. 2009) (finding that activities including doing laundry, preparing meals, attending church, and visiting friends, supported an ALJ’s decision to discredit a plaintiff’s complaints of pain).
finding that activities including doing laundry, preparing meals, attending church, and visiting friends, supported an ALJ’s decision to discredit a plaintiff’s complaints of pain
green Shelton v. Kijakazi (2022)
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
Admin., 567 F.3d 971, 976 (8th Cir. 2009).
green Stafford v. Saul (2022)
Rule Authority · W.D. Mo.
Admin., 567 F.3d 971, 975 (8th Cir. 2009) (upholding the decision to discredit a treating physicians’ opinion because in part it was contradicted by the treatment notes of other doctors); Karleskint v. Colvin, No. 12-03281-CV-S-DGK, 2013 WL 2241948 , at *5 (W.D.
upholding the decision to discredit a treating physicians’ opinion because in part it was contradicted by the treatment notes of other doctors
green Hastings v. Saul (2020)
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo. · 2 citations in this opinion
Admin., 567 F.3d 971, 976 (8th Cir. 2009).
green Beamer v. Berryhill (2020)
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
Admin., 567 F.3d 971, 976 (8th Cir. 2009); however, the caselaw generally suggests that where, as here, such daily activities are inconsistent with a claimant’s subjective complaints, it is proper for the ALJ to consider them, see Halverson v. Astrue, 600 F.3d 922 , 932–33 (8th Cir. 2010); Thomas, 881 F.3d at 676 .
green Vang v. Saul (2019)
Rule Authority · D. Minnesota
Since, as discussed below, the opinions to which Ms. V would have the ALJ give greater weight are inconsistent with other substantial evidence it was not error for the ALJ to disregard those opinions. at 791; , 567 F.3d 971, 974 (8th Cir. 2009) (finding an ALJ need not accept a treating physician’s opinion where it is inconsistent with substantial evidence). “medically-determinable” symptom of her mental illness, and disability could not be denied on that basis. at 945.
finding an ALJ need not accept a treating physician’s opinion where it is inconsistent with substantial evidence
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
Admin., 567 F.3d 971, 976 (8th Cir. 2009)); however, the caselaw generally suggests that where such daily activities are inconsistent with a claimant’s subjective complaints, it is proper for the ALJ to consider them in conjunction with other factors affecting the credibility of a Plaintiff's complaints, id. (citing Halverson v. Astrue, 600 F.3d 922, 932-33 (8th Cir. 2010)).
green Sheets v. Berryhill (2018)
Rule Authority · W.D. Mo.
Admin., 567 F.3d 971, 976 (8th Cir. 2009) (“Our cases admittedly send mixed signals about the significance of a claimant’s daily activities in evaluating claims of disabling pain, but Clevenger did report that she engaged in an array of such activities . . . and it was not unreasonable . . . for the ALJ to rely on this evidence to infer that Clevenger’s assertion of disabling pain was not entirely credible.”).
green Krick v. Berryhill (2018)
Rule Authority · D. Minnesota
Admin., 567 F.3d 971, 976 (8th Cir. 2009). (footnote continued from previous page) 2011 WL 1304909 , at *10 (E.D.
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
Admin., 567 F.3d 971, 976 (8th Cir.2009).
green Ge Xiong v. Colvin (2014)
Rule Authority · D. Minnesota
Admin., 567 F.3d 971, 974 (8th Cir.2009).
green Lewis v. Colvin (2013)
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
Martise v. Astrue, 641 F.3d 909, 926 (8th Cir.2011) (affirming ALJ’s decision to give treating physician’s medical source statement less weight when such was unsupported by medical evidence, including his own treatment notes, and consisted of checkmarks); Clevenger v. S.S.A., 567 F.3d 971, 975 (8th Cir.2009) (affirming ALJ’s decision not to follow opinion of treating physician that was not corroborated by treatment notes).
green Chong Vang v. Colvin (2013)
Rule Authority · D. Minnesota
Admin., 567 F.3d 971, 974 (8th Cir.2009).
green Rahe v. Astrue (2011)
Rule Authority · N.D. Iowa
Admin., 567 F.3d 971, 976 (8th Cir.2009)).
green TIPPIE v. Astrue (2011)
Rule Authority · N.D. Iowa
Admin., 567 F.3d 971, 976 (8th Cir.2009) (ALJ may reasonably discount claimant’s subjective complaints of disabling pain when the pain is controllable by medication); Raney v. Barnhart, 396 F.3d 1007, 1010 (8th Cir.2005) (finding claimant’s treating therapist’s clinical assessment of claimant as “improved” in treatment notes to be inconsistent with therapist’s RFC assessment and claimant’s claims of disability); Hutton v. Apfel, 175 F.3d 651, 655 (8th Cir.1999) (“Impairments…
Rule Authority · D. Minnesota
Admin., 567 F.3d 971, 976 (8th Cir.2009)(activities such as household chores, driving, attending church, and visiting with friends and relatives were not an unreasonable basis to discredit the claimant’s complaints of disabling pain).
green Wilson v. Berryhill (2020)
Cited · E.D. Mo. · signal: see
See Clevenger v. Social Security Administration, 567 F.3d 971, 976 (8th Cir. 2009).
green Delana v. Berryhill (2020)
Cited · E.D. Mo. · signal: see
See Clevenger v. Social Security Administration, 567 F.3d 971, 976 (8th Cir. 2009).
green Sangel v. Astrue (2011)
Cited · N.D. Iowa · signal: see
See Clevenger, 567 F.3d at 976 (ALJ may reasonably discount claimant’s subjective complaints of disabling pain when the pain is controllable by medication).
ALJ may reasonably discount claimant’s subjective complaints of disabling pain when the pain is controllable by medication
green Chipley v. Kijakazi (2024)
Cited (see also) · W.D. Mo. · signal: see also
The ALJ considered mental status reports, finding that “while mental status examinations at times note the claimant to have depressed and anxious mood, they otherwise generally reveal her to be alert and oriented; calm; cooperative; interactive; in no acute distress; with appropriate mood.” (Tr. at 22.) Considering the Plaintiff’s daily activities was also proper in determining whether Plaintiff’s complaints were credible. 20 C.F.R. § 416.929 (c)(3)(i); see also Clevenger v.…