Cluster 1356175

Trucking Assns., Inc. v. Smith, 496 U.S. 167, 214 , 110 S.Ct. 2323 , 110 *17 L.Ed.2d 148 (1990) (“The Court has no ... authority ... to disregard current law or treat similarly situated litigants differently.”); In re Fulton, 211 B.R. 247, 256 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 1997) (“The very idea of law connotes the same treatment for similarly situated persons for indistinguishable factual situations.”); Gaines v. State, 116 Nev. 359 , 998 P.2d 166, 173 (2000) (“The Equal Protection Clause…

State, 116 Nev. 359 , 365, 998 P.2d 166, 170 (2000), is inapplicable in this case where the statutes address entirely separate subjects.

The Nevada Supreme Court has also acknowledged that “a convicted person has a diminished expectation of privacy in the penal context.” Gaines v. 26 State, 998 P.2d 166, 172 (Nev. 2000).

Appellants have not argued that intermediate scrutiny applies, and because appellants have not demonstrated that NRS 502.253(4)(b) burdens a fundamental interest in a discriminatory way, their equal protection challenge receives rational basis review, which asks whether the challenged classification is "rationally related to a legitimate governmental interest." Williams v. State, 118 Nev. 536, 542 , 50 P.3d 1116, 1120 (2002); Gaines v. State, 116 Nev. 359 , 371, 998 P.2d 166…

See Round Hill, 97 Nev. at 604 , 637 P.2d at 536 (recognizing an exception to the general rule that mandamus may not be used to control a discretionary action for when "discretion is manifestly 3 abused or is exercised arbitrarily or capriciously"); see also Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 828 (1994) (requiring a prisoner to demonstrate that he or she has been incarcerated under conditions posing a substantial risk of serious harm and that the prison official's state of min…

Because NRS 48.045(3) does not target a suspect class or, as construed in Franks, a fundamental right, it is constitutional unless Goepner can show that it "is [not] rationally related to a legitimate governmental interest." Gaines v. State, 116 Nev. 359 , 371, 998 P.2d 166, 173 (2000).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1947A eo ; have previously explained that "a district court [cannot] credit[ ] a parolee or probationer for time served on a subsequent offense if such offense was committed while on probation or parole." Gaines v. State, 116 Nev. 359 , 364, 998 P.2d 166, 169 (2000); NRS 176.055(2)(b).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1947A eo ; have previously explained that "a district court [cannot] credit[ ] a parolee or probationer for time served on a subsequent offense if such offense was committed while on probation or parole." Gaines v. State, 116 Nev. 359 , 364, 998 P.2d 166, 169 (2000); NRS 176.055(2)(b).

Gaines v. State, 116 Nev. 359 , 371, 998 P.2d 166, 173 (2000); see Armijo v. State, 111 Nev. 1303, 1304 , 904 P.2d 1028, 1029 (1995) ("[T]he standard of the Equal Protection Clause of the Nevada Constitution [is] the same as the federal standard . . . .").

Gaines v. State, 116 Nev. 359 , 371, 998 P.2d 166, 173 (2000); see Armijo v. State, 111 Nev. 1303, 1304 , 904 P.2d 1028, 1029 (1995) ("[T]he standard of the Equal Protection Clause of the Nevada Constitution [is] the same as the federal standard . . . .").

Gaines v. State, 116 Nev. 359 , 371, 998 P.2d 166, 173 (2000); see Armijo v. State, 111 Nev. 1303, 1304 , 904 P.2d 1028, 1029 (1995) ("[T]he standard of the Equal Protection Clause of the Nevada Constitution [is] the same as the federal standard . . . .").

"The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment mandates that all persons similarly situated receive like treatment under the law." Gaines v. State, 116 Nev. 359 , 371, 998 P.2d 166, 173 (2000).

"The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment mandates that all persons similarly situated receive like treatment under the law." Gaines v. State, 116 Nev. 359 , 371, 998 P.2d 166, 173 (2000); see also City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Ctr., 473 U.S. 432, 439 (1985).

First, the Equal Protection Clause requires "that all persons similarly situated receive like treatment under the law." Gaines v. State, 116 Nev. 359 , 371, 998 P.2d 166, 173 (2000).

"The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment mandates that all persons similarly situated receive like treatment under the law." Gaines v. State, 116 Nev. 359 , 371, 998 P.2d 166, 173 (2000).

We construe “multiple legislative provisions ... as a whole,” Gaines v. State, 116 Nev. 359 , 365, 998 P.2d 166, 169 (2000), and “attribute the plain meaning to a statute that is not ambiguous.” Catanio, 120 Nev. at 1033 , 102 P.3d at 590 .

See, e.g., Roe v. Marcotte, 193 F.3d 72 , 82 (2d Cir.1999); L.S. v. State, 805 So.2d 1004, 1007-08 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App. 2001); Gaines v. State, 116 Nev. 359 , 998 P.2d 166, 173-74 (2000); State v. Leppert, 656 N.W.2d 718, 723 (N.D.2003); State v. Olivas, 122 Wash.2d 73 , 856 P.2d 1076, 1087 (1993).

Id. at 89 . .See Wilson v. Collins, 517 F.3d 421, 427 (6th Cir.2008); United States v. Kriesel, 508 F.3d 941, 946-47 (9th Cir.2007); United States v. Weikert, 504 F.3d 1, 11 (1st Cir. 2007); Banks v. United States, 490 F.3d 1178, 1184-93 (10th Cir.2007); United States v. Kraklio, 451 F.3d 922, 924 (8th Cir.2006); Johnson v. Quander, 440 F.3d 489 , 494 n. 1, 496 (D.C.Cir.2006); United States v. Sczubelek, 402 F.3d 175, 184 (3d Cir.2005); Padgett v. Donald, 401 F.3d 1273 , 127…

Cir. 2006); United States v. Sczubelek , 402 F.3d 175, 184 (3d Cir. 2005); Padgett v. Donald , 401 F.3d 1273 , 1278 n.4 (11th Cir. 2005) ; Groceman v. U.S. Dep't of Justice , 354 F.3d 411, 413-14 (5th Cir. 2004) (per curiam); Jones v. Murray , 962 F.2d 302 , 307 & n.2 (4th Cir. 1992) ; Polston v. State , 201 S.W.3d 406, 410-11 (Ark. 2005); Gaines v. State , 998 P.2d 166, 172 (Nev. 2000) ; State v. Scarborough , 201 S.W.3d 607, 618 (Tenn. 2006); Doles v. State , 994 P.2d 315,…

Cir. 2006); United States v. Sczubelek, 402 F.3d 175, 184 (3d Cir. 2005); Padgett v. Donald, 401 F.3d 1273 , 1278 n.4 (11th Cir. 2005); Groceman v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 354 F.3d 411, 413-14 (5th Cir. 2004) (per curiam); Jones v. Murray, 962 F.2d 302 , 307 & n.2 (4th Cir. 1992); Polston v. State, 201 S.W.3d 406, 410-11 (Ark. 2005); Gaines v. State, 998 P.2d 166, 172 (Nev. 2000); State v. Scarborough, 201 S.W.3d 607, 618 (Tenn. 2006); Doles v. State, 994 P.2d 315, 319 (Wyo. …

See, e.g., Polston v. State, 360 Ark. 317 , 201 S.W.3d 406, 410 (2005) (balancing test); Gaines v. State, 116 Nev. 359 , 998 P.2d 166, 172 (2000) (balancing test); State v. O’Hagen, 189 N.J. 140 , 914 A.2d 267, 277 (2007) (special needs test); State v. Scarborough, 201 S.W.3d 607, 618 (Tenn.2006) (balancing test); State v. Martin, 2008 VT 53 , 955 A.2d 1144 , 2008 WL 1914658 (2008) (special needs test); Doles v. State, 994 P.2d 315, 319 (Wyo.1999) (balancing test).

App. Ct. 1995); Landry v. Att’y Gen., 709 N.E.2d 1085 , 1092 (Mass. 1999); Cooper v. Gammon, 943 S.W.2d 699, 704 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997); Gaines v. State, 998 P.2d 166, 172 (Nev. 2000); State ex rel.

App. Ct. 1995); Landry v. Att’y Gen. , 709 N.E.2d 1085 , 1092 (Mass. 1999); Cooper v. Gammon , 943 S.W.2d 699, 704 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997); Gaines v. State , 998 P.2d 166, 172 (Nev. 2000); State ex rel .

The parties do not dispute that Carson City’s water rights are vested and that appropriations were initiated prior to March 1913. 7 Seput v. Lacayo, 122 Nev. 499, 502 , 134 P.3d 733, 735 (2006). 8 Gaines v. State, 116 Nev. 359 , 365, 998 P.2d 166, 169-70 (2000). 9 SIIS v. Surman, 103 Nev. 366, 368 , 741 P.2d 1357, 1359 (1987). 10 Seput, 122 Nev. at 502-03 , 134 P.3d at 735 ; Torreyson v. Board of Examiners, 1 Nev. 19, 22 (1871). 11 As AFA conceded at oral argument, a loss of…

JV- *618 512600 and JV-512797, 187 Ariz. 419 , 930 P.2d 496, 500-01 (1996); People v. Adams, 115 Cal.App.4th 243 , 9 Cal.Rptr.3d 170, 183-84 (2004); L.S. v. State, 805 So.2d 1004, 1006-07 (Fl.Dist.Ct.App.2001); People v. Calahan, 272 Ill.App.3d 293 , 208 Ill.Dec. 532 , 649 N.E.2d 588, 592 (1995); State v. Martinez, 276 Kan. 527 , 78 P.3d 769, 775 (2003); Raines, 857 A.2d at 21 ; Landry v. Attorney General, 429 Mass. 336 , 709 N.E.2d 1085 , 1092 (1999); Cooper v. Gammon, 943 …

Const. art. 1, § 18. 4 Howe v. State, 112 Nev 458, 463, 916 P.2d 153, 157 (1996). 5 Lightford v. State, 90 Nev 136, 139, 520 P.2d 955, 956 (1974). 6 See Gaines v. State, 116 Nev. 359 , 374, 998 P.2d 166, 175 (2000); see also U.S. v. Kincade, 379 F.3d 813, 839 (9th Cir. 2004). 7 People v. King, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 220, 227 (Ct. App. 2000). 8 Treasury Employees v. Von Raab, 489 U.S. 656, 665-66 (1989). 9 See, e.g., Wis. Stat. Ann. § 165.77 (West 1997). 10 See, e.g., Tex. Gov’t Co…

The district court later merged these three felonies into a single offense of violating NRS 484.379 and NRS 484.3792. 3 NRS 484.379(l)(c). 4 See NRS 193.130; NRS 207.010; see also Breault v. State, 116 Nev. 311 , 314, 996 P.2d 888, 889 (2000). 5 Lader v. State, Docket No. 35936 (Order Dismissing Appeal, July 26, 2000). 6 Kirksey v. State, 112 Nev. 980, 987 , 923 P.2d 1102, 1107 (1996). 7 Riley v. State, 110 Nev. 638, 647 , 878 P.2d 272, 278 (1994). 8 Strickland v. Washington…

JV-512600 and JV-512797, 187 Ariz. 419 , 930 P.2d 496, 500-01 (1996); Alfaro v. Terhune, 98 Cal.App.4th 492, 505-06 , 120 Cal.Rptr.2d 197 (Cal.App.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1136 , 123 S.Ct. 922 , 154 L.Ed.2d 828 (2003); People v. Calaban, 272 Ill.App.3d 293 , 208 Ill.Dec. 532 , 649 N.E.2d 588, 591-92 (1995); State v. Martinez, 276 Kan. 527 , 78 P.3d 769, 773-76 (2003); Landry v. Attorney General, 429 Mass. 336 , 709 N.E.2d 1085 , 1091-92 (1999); Gaines v. State, 116 Nev.…

LEXIS 25754 (D.Or.2002); Shelton v. Gudmanson, 934 F.Supp. 1048 (W.D.Wis.1996); Kruger v. Erickson, 875 F.Supp. 583 (D.Minn.1995); Vanderlinden v. Kansas, 874 F.Supp. 1210 (D.Kan.1995); Sanders v. Coman, 864 F.Supp. 496 (E.D.N.C.1994); Ryncarz v. Eikenberry, 824 F.Supp. 1493 (E.D.Wash.1993); Landry v. Attorney General, 429 Mass. 336, 343-48 , 709 N.E.2d 1085 (1999); Gaines v. State, 116 Nev. 359 , 998 P.2d 166, 171-73 (2000); Johnson v. Commonwealth, 259 Va. 654 , 529 S.E.2d…

Co. v. Virgin River Casino, 118 Nev. 699 , 703, 56 P.3d 887 , 890 (2002). 21 Diamond v. Swick, 117 Nev. 671, 676 , 28 P.3d 1087, 1090 (2001) (quoting Gaines v. State, 116 Nev. 359 , 365, 998 P.2d 166, 169-70 (2000)). 22 See NRS 638.100(6) (repealed 2003); NRS 638.154 (repealed 2003). 23 Bobby Berosini, Ltd. v. PETA, 114 Nev. 1348, 1352-53 , 971 P.2d 383, 386 (1998). 24 Id. at 1353 , 971 P.2d at 386 . 25 Reese v. Mandel, 167 A.2d 111, 116 (Md. 1961). 26 While NRS 638.147(10) …

Ct. App. 1994); State v. Maass , 64 P.3d 382, 389 (Kan. 2003); Landry , 709 N.E.2d at 1091-92; Cooper , 943 S.W.2d at 704-05 ; Gaines v. State , 998 P.2d 166, 171-72 (Nev.), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 856 (2000); Nicholson , 724 N.E.2d at 1221 (involving a juvenile required to give a DNA sample); State ex rel.

(Edmond was decided on November 28, 2000.) See Johnson v. Commonwealth, 259 Va. 654 , 529 S.E.2d 769, 779 (2000); Gaines v. Nevada, 116 Nev. 359 , 998 P.2d 166, 172 (2000); Doles v. State, 994 P.2d 315, 317-18 (Wyo.1999); Landry v. Attorney General, 429 Mass. 336 , 709 N.E.2d 1085 , 1091 (1999); In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action, 187 Ariz. 419 , 930 P.2d 496, 501 (1996); Cooper v. Gammon, 943 S.W.2d 699, 705 (Mo.Ct.App.1997); People v. Wealer, 264 Ill.App.3d 6 , 201 Ill.…

See, e.g., Roe v. Marcotte, 193 F.3d 72, 82 (2d Cir.1999); Gaines v. State, 116 Nev. 359 , 998 P.2d 166, 174 (2000); State v. Olivas, 122 Wash.2d 73 , 856 P.2d 1076, 1087 (1993).

The New York Statute is substantially similar to the federal statute on DNA collection and any distinctions are not included in the analysis of this case. 39 .See Maass, 275 Kan. 328, 64 P.3d 382 ; Boling, 101 F.3d at 1340; Rise, 59 F.3d 1556 ; Jones, 962 F.2d at 307-08 ; Kruger v. Erickson, 875 F.Supp. 583, 588-89 (D.Minn.1995), aff'd on other grounds, 77 F.3d 1071 (8th Cir.1996); Sanders v. Coman, 864 F.Supp. 496, 499 (E.D.N.C.1994); Ryncarz v. Eikenberry, 824 F.Supp. 1493…

Const, art. 4, § 21. 7 See Gaines v. State, 116 Nev. 359 , 371, 998 P.2d 166, 173 (2000). 8 Id. 9 Id. 10 Id. 11 Zamarripa v. District Court, 103 Nev. 638, 642 , 747 P.2d 1386, 1388 (1987). 12 State v. Phillips, 873 P.2d 706 , 709 & n.5 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994); see also Shepler v. State, 758 N.E.2d 966, 969 (Ind. Ct. App. 2001); People v. Gassman, 622 N.E.2d 845, 853 (Ill.

Group, 106 Nev. 371, 374 , 793 P.2d 1324, 1326 (1990)). 6 State v. Webster, 88 Nev. 690, 696 , 504 P.2d 1316, 1320 (1972). 7 Black’s Law Dictionary 1045 (abridged 7th ed. 2000). 8 The word “misrepresentation,” as opposed to “representation,” is defined as the “act of making a false or misleading statement about something, usu. with the intent to deceive.” Id. at 813 . 9 Id. at 489. 10 Gaines v. State, 116 Nev. 359 , 365, 998 P.2d 166, 169-70 (2000) (citing Building & Const)'.

See Gaines v. State, 116 Nev. 359 , 371, 998 P.2d 166, 173 (2000) (recognizing that the first step in an equal protection analysis is to determine the level of scrutiny to be applied, that strict scrutiny analysis is only applied in cases involving fundamental rights or suspect classes, and that under a lesser standard of review, legislation will be upheld "if the challenged classification is rationally related to a legitimate governmental interest"); see also Graziano v. Pa…

See Gaines v. State, 116 Nev. 359 , 998 P.2d 166 (2000).

Compare United States v. McLaurin, 731 F.3d 258, 262 (2d Cir. 2013) (equating narrow tailoring with reasonable necessity) with Gaines v. State, 116 Nev. 359 , 371, 998 P.2d 166, 173 (2000) (seeming to equate narrow tailoring with strict necessity).

Bowers v. Whitman, 671 F.3d 905, 916-17 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 568 U.S. 133 S. Ct. 163 (2012); see also Gaines v. State, 116 Nev. 359 , 372, 998 P.2d 166, 174 (2000).

Bowers v. Whitman, 671 F.3d 905, 916-17 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 133 S. Ct. 163 (2012); see also Gaines v. State, 116 Nev. 359 , 372, 998 P.2d 166, 174 (2000).