How cited: Quaker Oats Co. v. Stanton · Go Syfert

Quaker Oats Co. v. Stanton (2003)

green · 25 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 10 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 10
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200320142026
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green Lane v. Lensmeyer (2005)
Rule Authority · Mo. · 3 citations in this opinion
Payment under protest is required before seeking relief under subsections 1 to 4 so that "the taxpayer can make it known that [he or she] is paying involuntarily and can alert the taxing authority to the amount of the refund claimed so that the challenged tax can be segregated and held until resolution of the dispute.” Quaker Oats Co. v. Stanton, 96 S.W.3d 133, 138 (Mo.App. 2003).
green Westside Neighborhood Association v. Gail McCann Beatty (2021)
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Pursuant to chapters 137 and 138 of the Revised Statues of Missouri, initial review of such a claim does not lie with the circuit courts.7 The administrative remedies set forth in chapters 137 and 138 “are part of what the Supreme Court has called ‘a complex scheme of property taxation.’” Quaker Oats Co. v. Stanton, 96 S.W.3d 133, 137 (Mo. App. W.D. 2003) (quoting Bartlett v. Ross, 891 S.W.2d 114, 116 (Mo. banc 1995)); see also State ex rel.
quoting Bartlett v. Ross, 891 S.W.2d 114, 116 (Mo. banc 1995)
green Shafinia v. Nash (2012)
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
The Supreme Court has stated that the foregoing statutory remedies are “adequate, certain and complete,” C & D, 624 S.W.2d at 838 , and, thus, they “must be utilized exclusively, and ... followed to exhaustion.” Quaker Oats Co. v. Stanton, 96 S.W.3d 133, 140 (Mo.App.2003).
green Sherf v. Koster (2012)
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.
Where, as here, the facts have been stipulated to, the question “is whether the trial court drew the proper legal conclusion from the facts.” Quaker Oats Co. v. Stanton, 96 S.W.3d 133, 137 (Mo.App.
green Adams v. FRIGANZA (2011)
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.
Quaker Oats Co. v. Stanton, 96 S.W.3d 133, 140 (Mo.App.
green Stephenson v. Village of Claycomo (2007)
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.
Where the parties have stipulated to the facts, the only question for this court is “whether the trial court drew the proper legal conclusion from the facts.” Quaker Oats Co. v. Stanton, 96 S.W.3d 133, 137 (Mo.App.2003).
green Byers v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. (2003)
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.
Quaker Oats Co. v. Stanton, 96 S.W.3d 133, 136 (Mo.App.
green Auto Owners (Mutual) Insurance Co. v. Sugar Creek Memorial Post No. 3976 (2003)
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.
Quaker Oats Co. v. Stanton, 96 S.W.3d 133, 136-37 (Mo.App.
green McCarthy v. Peterson (2003)
Cited (see also) · Mo. Ct. App. · signal: see also
W.D.1998); see also Quaker Oats Co. v. Stanton 96 S.W.3d 133, 142 (Mo.App.
green Missouri American Water Co. v. Collector of St. Charles County (2003)
Cited (see also) · Mo. Ct. App. · signal: see also
See also The Quaker Oats Company v. Collector of Buchanan County, 96 S.W.3d 133 (Mo.App.