How cited: Cluster 1380295 · Go Syfert

Cluster 1380295

green · 88 citation events across 26 courts. Showing the 38 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Jr. Chamber of Com., 354 F. Supp. 61, 71 (N.D.
agreeing that “benevolent, religious, charitable or fraternal organizations” are entitled to injunctive relief in the context of a common law unfair competition claim when local chapters disaffiliate but continue to use the organization’s name
Rule Authority · N.D. Cal.
Cal. Sept. 22, 2017) 25 (“despite Defendants’ attempt to argue abandonment through third party use or failure to police, 26 these arguments are unquestionably meritless as Defendants have not proven that Plaintiff’s mark 27 is generic”) aff’d, 807 F. App’x 674 (9th Cir. 2020); Century 21 Real Estate Corp. v. Sandlin, 846 1 F.2d 1175 , 1181 (9th Cir.1988) (stating that “discovery that revealed other potential infringers 2 would be irrelevant under the law of this circuit”); U…
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
Junior Chamber of Commerce, 354 F.Supp. 61, 72 (N.D.Cal.1972) (same); Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc. v. Better Business Bureau, Inc., 200 U.S.P.Q. 282 (S.D.Fla.1978) (same); Hot Stuff Foods, LLC v. Mean Gene’s Enters., 468 F.Supp.2d 1078, 1095 (D.S.D.2006) (applying the merger rule in the licensor-licensee context); Bunn-O-Matic Corp. v. Bunn Coffee Serv., Inc., 88 F.Supp.2d 914, 923 (C.D.Ill.2000) (same).
Rule Authority · D. Haw.
See Century 21 Real Estate Corp. v. Sandlin, 846 F.2d 1175, 1181 (9th Cir.1988) (stating that “discovery that revealed other potential infringers would be irrelevant under the law of this circuit”); U.S. Jaycees v. San Francisco Junior Chamber of Commerce, 354 F.Supp. 61, 73-74 (N.D.Cal.1972), aff 'd 513 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir.1975) (noting that “numerous cases” have held that “the existence of infringers other than the defendant was irrelevant to a determination of whether the …
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
See, e.g., Kappa Sigma Fraternity v. Kappa Sigma Gamma Fraternity, 654 F.Supp. 1095, 1101 (D.N.H.1987) (membership in collegiate Greek-letter fraternity and solicitation of alumni contributions); American Diabetes Ass'n, Inc. v. Nat'l Diabetes Ass'n, 533 F.Supp. 16, 20 (E.D.Pa.1981) (solicitation of donations), aff'd, 681 F.2d 804 (3d Cir.1982); United States Jaycees v. Philadelphia Jaycees, 490 F.Supp. 688, 691 (E.D.Pa.1980) (public service projects including Special Olympi…
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
See, e.g., Kappa Sigma Fraternity v. Kappa Sigma Gamma Fraternity, 654 F.Supp. 1095, 1101 (D.N.H.1987) (membership in collegiate Greek-letter fraternity and solicitation of alumni contributions); American Diabetes Ass’n, Inc. v. Nat’l Diabetes Ass’n, 533 F.Supp. 16, 20 (E.D.Pa.1981) (solicitation of donations), aff'd, 681 F.2d 804 (3d Cir.1982); United States Jaycees v. Philadelphia Jaycees, 490 F.Supp. 688, 691 (E.D.Pa.1980) (public service projects including Special Olympi…
meetings, competitions, and other special events for young men interested in community affairs; community betterment programs
Rule Authority · C.D. Cal.
States Jaycees v. San Francisco Junior Chamber of Commerce, 354 F.Supp. 61, 68-69 (N.D.Cal.1972), aff 'd, 513 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir.1975) (per curiam). 6 .
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Country Floors, Inc. v. Partnership of Gepner and Ford, 930 F.2d 1056, 1065 (3d Cir.1991); United States Jaycees v. Philadelphia Jaycees, 639 F.2d 134, 142 (3d Cir.1981); see also Foxtrap, Inc. v. Foxtrap, Inc., 671 F.2d 636, 640-41 (D.C.Cir.1982); Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc. v. Better Business Bureau of South Florida, Inc., 200 U.S.P.Q. 282 , 298 (S.D.Fla.1978); United States Jaycees v. San Francisco Junior Chamber of Commerce, 354 F.Supp. 61, 77 (N.D.Cal.1972)…
Rule Authority · D.N.H.
See, e.g., McLean v. Fleming, 96 U.S. (6 Otto) 245, 253, 24 L.Ed. 828 (1877); United States Jaycees v. San Francisco Jr. Chamber of Commerce, 354 F.Supp. 61, 72-73 (N.D.Cal.1972), aff'd 513 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir.1975).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Rather, it is an example of "the common law of trademark infringement and unfair competition [which] is replete with cases holding that benevolent, religious, charitable or fraternal organizations are entitled to injunctive relief protecting against the continued use of their name by local chapters which disaffiliate.” United States Jaycees v. San Francisco Junior Chamber of Commerce, 354 F.Supp. 61, 71 (N.D.Cal.1972) (citing numerous cases), aff'd 513 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir.197…
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Rather, it is an example of "the common law of trademark infringement and unfair competition [which] is replete with cases holding that benevolent, religious, charitable or fraternal organizations are entitled to injunctive relief protecting against the continued use of their name by local chapters which disaffiliate." United States Jaycees v. San Francisco Junior Chamber of Commerce, 354 F.Supp. 61, 71 (N.D.Cal.1972) (citing numerous cases), aff'd 513 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir.197…
Rule Authority · 6th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
See Grand Lodge, supra; Council of Better Business Bureaus, supra, at 296; United States Jaycees v. San Francisco Junior Chamber of Commerce, 354 F.Supp. 61, 71-72 (N.D.Cal.1972); National Board of YWCA v. YWCA of Charleston, South Carolina, 335 F.Supp. 615, 622 (D.S.C.1971).
Rule Authority · C.D. Cal. · 2 citations in this opinion
United States Jaycees v. San Francisco Jr. Chamber of Commerce, 354 F.Supp. 61, 68-69, 78 (N.D.Cal.1972) (Renfrew, J.), affd, 513 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir.1975); Pure Gold, Inc. v. Syntex 9 (U.S.A.), Inc., 739 F.2d 624, 626-27 (Fed.Cir.1984).
Rule Authority · D.C. Cir.
See, e.g., United States Jaycees v. Philadelphia Jaycees, 639 F.2d 134 , 139-40 (3d Cir.1981); United States Jaycees v. San Francisco Jr. Chamber of Commerce, 354 F.Supp. 61, 71 (N.D.Cal. 1972), aff'd, 513 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir.1975); see also 513 F.2d at 1231 & n. 9 (Merrill, J., dissenting) (discussing National Bd. of the Young Women's Christian Ass'n v. Young Women’s Christian Ass’n of Charleston, 335 F.Supp. 615 (D.S.C.1971); Grand Lodge Improved Benevolent, Protective Orde…
Rule Authority · 4th Cir.
The line of cases relied on by Sweetheart states that evidence of a plaintiff’s failure to sue other *1047 infringers is totally irrelevant in an unfair competition case because “it is no excuse for [a defendant] to say that others have been guilty of the same wrong.” National Lead Company v. Wolfe, 223 F.2d 195 , 204 (9th Cir.1955); United States Jaycees v. San Francisco Jr. Chamber of Commerce, 354 F.Supp. 61, 73 (N.D.Cal.1972), aff'd 513 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir.1975) (and case…
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App. · 4 citations in this opinion
The court also held: Notwithstanding the fact that defendant SFJCC was organized approximately one year prior to its affiliation with State and three years prior to its affiliation with National, any separate existence defendant SFJCC might have had prior to its affiliation with plaintiffs was merged with plaintiff organizations upon SFJCC's affiliation with and charter membership in these organizations. 354 F.Supp. at 72 (emphasis added).
emphasis added
Rule Authority · D.D.C.
Pa.1980), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 639 F.2d 134 (3d Cir.1981); United States Jaycees v. San Francisco Junior Chamber of Commerce, 354 F.Supp. 61, 71 (N.D.Cal.1972), aff’d, 513 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir. 1975), but it may also be lost to them by the same defenses, including acquiescence and laches.
Rule Authority · D.D.C.
Pa.1980), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 639 F.2d 134 (3d Cir.1981); United States Jaycees v. San Francisco Junior Chamber of Commerce, 354 F.Supp. 61, 71 (N.D.Cal.1972), aff'd, 513 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir. 1975), but it may also be lost to them by the same defenses, including acquiescence and laches.
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
McNeil Laboratories v. American Home Products Corp., 416 F.Supp. 804 (D.N.J.1976); International Order of Job’s Daughters v. Lindeburg & Co., 196 U.S.P.Q. 461 (N.D.CaI.1977); United States Jaycees v. San Francisco Junior Chamber of Commerce, 354 F.Supp. 61, 73 (N.D.Cal.1972), aff’d, 513 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir. 1977), and cases cited therein; see also 4 Callmann, The Law of Unfair Competition, Trademarks and Monopolies, § 87.3(e) at 152 (3d Ed. 1970).
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
McNeil Laboratories v. American Home Products Corp., 416 F.Supp. 804 (D.N.J. 1976); International Order of Job’s Daughters v. Lindeburg & Co., 196 U.S.P.Q. 461 (N.D.Cal. 1977); United States Jaycees v. San Francisco Junior Chamber of Commerce, 354 F.Supp. 61, 73 (N.D.Cal. 1972), affd, 513 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir. 1977), and cases cited therein; see also 4 Callman, The Law of Unfair Competition, Trademarks and Monopolies, § 87.3(e) at 152 (3d Ed. 1970). 10 .
Rule Authority · N.D.N.Y.
Tisch Hotels, Inc. v. Americana Inn, Inc., supra, 350 F.2d at 614 ; United States Jaycees v. San Francisco Junior Chamber of Commerce, 354 F.Supp. 61, 73-74 (N.D.Cal.1972), aff’d, 513 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir. 1975).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
There is nothing to weigh, there is no credibility involved' ". 586 F.2d at 713 , n. 3 7 See E. g., United States Jaycees v. San Francisco Jr. Cham. of Com., 354 F.Supp. 61, 68-69 (N.D.Cal.1972), Aff'd, 513 F.2d 1226 (9 Cir. 1975) 8 See Maternally Yours v. Your Maternity Shop, 234 F.2d 538, 542 (2 Cir. 1956).
Rule Authority · N.D. Cal.
Menendez v. Holt, 128 U.S. 514, 523-24 , 9 S.Ct. 143 , 32 L.Ed. 526 (1888); McLean v. Fleming, 96 U.S. 245, 253 , 24 L.Ed. 828 (1877); Stork Restaurant, supra, 166 F.2d at 362-63 ; United States Jaycees v. San Francisco Junior Chamber of Commerce, 354 F.Supp. 61, 72-73 (N.D.Cal.1973), aff’d., 513 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir. 1975); 4 Callmann, Unfair Competition, supra, § 87(3)(b)(l) at 125-26.
Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.
Heaton Distributing Co. v. Tank Car Co., 387 F.2d 477, 485 (8th Cir. 1967); Tisch Hotels, supra, 350 F.2d at 614 ; Fleischmann Distilling Corp., supra, 314 F.2d at 160 ; United States Jaycees v. San Francisco Jr. Chamber of Commerce, 354 F.Supp. 61, 73 (N.D.Cal.1972), aff’d. 513 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir. 1975); James Burrough, supra, 309 F.Supp. at 1160 . 14 For the reasons set forth above I conclude that plaintiff has shown a strong likelihood of success on the merits of this act…
Rule Authority · W.D. Okla.
Giant Food Inc. v. Malone & Hyde, Inc., 522 F.2d 1386 (C.C.P.A.1975); Tisch Hotels, Inc. v. Americana Inn, Inc., 350 F.2d 609, 614 (7th Cir. 1965); United States Jaycees v. San Francisco Jr. Chamber of Commerce, 354 F.Supp. 61, 73 (N.D.Cal. 1972); James Burrough, Ltd. v. Lesher, 309 F.Supp. 1154, 1160 (S.D.Ind.1969). 9.
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 4 citations in this opinion
The district court found that its reasons for doing so were "primarily because the majority of its members felt that they did not receive sufficient value for the dues paid to plaintiffs, and also because of disagreement with National with respect to philosophy and public positions taken by National." United States Jaycees v. San Francisco Junior Chamber of Commerce, 354 F.Supp. 61, 64 (N.D.Cal.1972).
Cited · E.D. Cal. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See U.S. Jaycees v. San Francisco Jr. Chamber of Commerce, 354 F.Supp. 61, 76 (N.D.Cal.1972) (finding that because defendant’s and plaintiffs civic services were substantially similar, defendant’s use of plaintiffs trademark would likely confuse consumers).
Cited · D.N.H. · signal: see
See United States Jaycees v. San Francisco Junior Chamber of Commerce, 354 F.Supp. 61, 78 (N.D.Cal.1972).
Cited · W.D. Tex. · signal: see
See United States Jaycees v. San Francisco Junior Chamber of Commerce, 354 F.Supp. 61 , 72 & n. 7 (N.D.Cal.1972), aff'd, 513 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir.1975).
Cited · M.D. La. · signal: see
See United *1160 States Jaycees v. San Francisco Junior Chamber of Commerce, 354 F.Supp. 61 (N.D.Calf.1972), aff'd, 513 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir.1975).
Cited · D.N.J. · signal: see
See United States Jaycees v. San Francisco Jr. Chamber of Commerce, 354 F.Supp. 61, 73 (N.D.Cal.1972), aff’d, 513 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir. 1975).
Cited (see also) · C.D. Cal. · signal: see also
Porsche AG v. Universal Brass, 1995 WL 420816 , 34 U.S.P.Q.2d 1593 (W.D.Wash.1995) (entering summary judgment against defendant on Porsche’s § 1114 and § 1125 claims when defendant reproduced Porsche logo and crest on its products without authorization and holding “no rational trier of fact could find that confusion as to Porsche’s sponsorship is unlikely”); see also United States Jaycees v. San Francisco Junior Chamber of Commerce, 354 F.Supp. 61, 78 (N.D.Cal.1972) (“Regard…
Cited (see also) · D. Idaho · signal: see also
See also United States Jaycees v. San Francisco Jr. Chamber of Commerce, 354 F.Supp. 61, 71 (N.D.Cal.1972) (“... it cannot be ignored that the common law of trademark infringement and unfair competition is replete with cases holding that benevolent, religious, charitable, or fraternal organizations are entitled to injunctive relief protecting against the continued use of their name by local chapters which disaffiliate.”) (citing numerous eases), aff'd 513 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir.…
Cited (see also) · 9th Cir. · signal: see also
Citibank, N.A., 206 U.S.P.Q. at 1011 ; see also United States Jaycees v. San Francisco Junior Chamber of Commerce, 354 F.Supp. 61, 73-74 (N.D.Cal.1972), aff'd, 513 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir.1975).
Cited (see also) · 9th Cir. · signal: see, e.g. · 2 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., United States Jaycees v. San Francisco Junior Chamber of Commerce, 354 F.Supp. 61, 68-69 (N.D.Cal.1972), aff'd, 513 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir.1975) (per curiam).
Cited (see also) · N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · signal: see also
See also United States Jaycees v. San Francisco Junior Chamber of Commerce, 354 F. Supp. 61, 73-74 (N.D.Cal. 1972), aff'd per curiam 513 F. 2d 1226 (9 Cir.1975).
Cited (see also) · Wyo. · signal: see, e.g. · 2 citations in this opinion
See e. g., United States Jaycees v. San Francisco Junior Chamber of Commerce, D.C.N.D.Cal., 354 F.Supp. 61 (1972), affirmed 9 Cir. 1975, 513 F.2d 1226 ; Miss Universe, Inc. v. Patricelli, 2 Cir. 1969, 408 F.2d 506 .
Cited (see also) · 9th Cir. · signal: see also
See also United States Jaycees v. San Francisco Junior Chamber of Commerce, 354 F.Supp. 61, 77-78 (N.D.Cal.1972), aff’d, 513 F.2d 1226 (9 Cir. 1975).