How cited: Cluster 1407329 · Go Syfert

Cluster 1407329

green · 33 citation events across 7 courts. Showing the 12 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · E.D.N.Y
Precision Testing Laboratories, Ltd. v. Kenyon Corporation of America, 644 F.Supp. 1327, 1349 (S.D.N.Y.1986) (quoting Sherrier v. Richard, 564 F.Supp. 448, 457 (S.D.N.Y.1983)).
Rule Authority · 2d Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Sherrier v. Richard, supra, 564 F.Supp. at 459 (hereinafter "the underlying lawsuit" or "Sherrier ").
hereinafter "the underlying lawsuit" or "Sherrier "
Rule Authority · 2d Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Sherrier v. Richard, supra, 564 F.Supp. at 459 (hereinafter “the underlying lawsuit” or “Sherrier”).
hereinafter “the underlying lawsuit” or “Sherrier”
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
Sherrier v. Richard, 564 F.Supp. 448, 457 (S.D.N.Y.1983) (Sweet, J.) (citing Chalmers v. Eaton Corp., 71 A.D.2d 721 , 419 N.Y.S.2d 217 (3d Dep’t 1979)).
Rule Authority · Bankr. N.D.N.Y.
Accord, McGhan v. Ebersol, 608 F.Supp. 277, 282 (S.D.N.Y.1985); Sherrier v. Richard, 564 F.Supp. 448, 457 (S.D.N.Y.1983); Ackerman v. Landes, 112 A.D.2d 1081 , 493 N.Y.S.2d 59 (2d Dep’t 1985); Chalmers v. Eaton Corp., 71 A.D.2d 721 , 419 N.Y.S.2d 217 (3d Dep’t 1979).
Rule Authority · E.D.N.Y · 2 citations in this opinion
Under New York law, a joint venture is: “a special combination of two or more persons wherein some specific venture a profit is jointly-sought without any actual partnership or corporation designation.” See Sherrier v. Richard, 564 F.Supp. 448, 457 (S.D.N.Y.1983). *1105 A joint venture is contractual and may be oral.
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
The crucial factors to be considered in determining whether a joint venture exists are “the intent of the parties, express or implied, whether there was joint control and management of the business, whether there was sharing of profits and losses, and whether there was a combination of property, skill or knowledge.” Sherrier v. Richard, 564 F.Supp. 448, 457 (S.D.N.Y.1983) (citing Ramirez v. Goldberg, 82 A.D.2d 850, 852 , 439 N.Y.S.2d 959, 961 (2d Dep’t 1981) (per curiam)).
per curiam
green McGhan v. Ebersol (1985)
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
In order to find a joint venture, “[t]he crucial factors to be considered are the intent of the parties, express or implied, whether there was joint control and management of the business, whether there was sharing of profits and losses, and whether there was a combination of property, skill or knowledge.” Sherrier v. Richard, 564 F.Supp. 448, 457 (S.D.N.Y.1983), citing Ramirez v. Goldberg, 82 A.D.2d 850 , 439 N.Y.S.2d 959 (2d Dep’t 1981).
green Wilkins v. Heebner (1984)
Rule Authority · Pa. · 2 citations in this opinion
See also: Nelson v. Serwold, 687 F.2d 278, 282 (9th Cir.1982); Sherrier v. Richard, 564 F.Supp. 448, 457 (S.D.N.Y.1983); Crest Construction Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 417 F.Supp. 564, 569 (W.D.Okla.1976); Moore v. Merchants & Planters Bank, 434 So.2d 751, 753 (Ala.1983); Northern Lights Motel, Inc. v. Sweaney, 561 P.2d 1176, 1187 (Alaska 1977); Sparks v. Republic National Life Insurance Co., 132 Ariz. 529, 540 , 647 P.2d 1127, 1138 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1070 ,…
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
Skerrier v. Richard, 564 F.Supp. 448, 457 (S.D.N.Y.1983).
Cited · N.D. Cal. · signal: see
See Sherrier v. Richard, 564 F.Supp. 448, 457 (S.D.N.Y.1983) (defining joint venture).
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see
McGhan v. Ebersol, 608 F.Supp. 277, 282 (S.D.N.Y.1985); see Sherrier v. Richard, 564 F.Supp. 448, 457 (S.D.N.Y.1983); Yonofsky v. Wernick, 362 F.Supp. 1005, 1030-31 (S.E.N.Y.1973) (citing U.S. v. Standard Oil, 155 F.Supp. 121, 148 (S.D.N.Y.1957), aff'd, 270 F.2d 50 (2d Cir.1959), in 2 S. Williston, Contracts § 318A at 579 (1959)); Ramirez v. Goldberg, 82 A.D.2d 850, 852 , 439 N.Y.S.2d 959, 961 (2d Dep’t 1981).