How cited: Cluster 1407612 · Go Syfert

Cluster 1407612

green · 55 citation events across 5 courts. Showing the 10 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · Colo.
Because the legislature is generally trusted with what timelines are reasonable for statutes of limitations, Mishek v. Stanton, 200 Colo. 514, 518 , 616 P.2d 135, 138 (1980), and because Cacioppo has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that those timelines are manifestly unreasonable, we defer to the legislature's wisdom in this instance.
Rule Authority · Colo.
Because the legislature is generally trusted with what timelines are reasonable for statutes of limitations, Mishek v. Stanton, 200 Colo. 514, 518 , 616 P.2d 135, 188 (1980), and because Cacioppo has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that those timelines are manifestly unreasonable, we defer to the legislature's wisdom in this instance.
Rule Authority · Colo.
Dove, 808 P.2d at 1274 ; Mishek v. Stanton, 200 Colo. 514, 518 , 616 P.2d 135, 138 (1980); Oberst , 148 Colo, at 292, 365 P.2d at 905 .
green Dove v. Delgado (1991)
Rule Authority · Colo. · 3 citations in this opinion
Mishek v. Stanton, 200 Colo. 514, 518 , 616 P.2d 135, 138 (1980); Oberst v. Mays, 148 Colo. 285, 292 , 365 P.2d 902, 905 (1961).
green Gerner v. Sullivan (1989)
Rule Authority · Colo.
(Emphasis added.) In Mishek v. Stanton, 200 Colo. 514, 518 , 616 P.2d 135, 138 (1980), we held that statutes of limitation do not violate constitutional due process where the time allowed within which to bring a suit is reasonable and does not amount to a denial of justice.
green Austin v. Litvak (1984)
Rule Authority · Colo. · 2 citations in this opinion
In Mishek , the claimant’s equal protection argument was limited to her contention that “ ‘no reasonable basis exists for separating medical and healing professionals from other professionals and lay persons and granting them the special protection afforded by the six-year maximum statute of limitations’ and therefore section 13-80-105, C.R.S.1973, violates constitutional provisions guaranteeing equal protection and the state constitutional prohibition against special legisl…
Rule Authority · Colo. · 2 citations in this opinion
As we pointed out in Mishek v. Stanton, 616 P.2d 135, 138 (Colo.1980): “The general rule is that a statute of limitations ... does not violate due process ‘unless the time fixed by the statute is manifestly so limited as to amount to a denial of justice ....
Cited · Colo. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Mishek v. Stanton, 200 Colo. 514 , 616 P.2d 135 (1980).
green Miller v. Lunnon (1985)
Cited · Colo. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Mishek v. Stanton, 200 Colo. 514 , 616 P.2d 135 (1980).
green Marriott v. Goldstein (1983)
Cited · Colo. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Mishek v. Stanton, 200 Colo. 514 , 616 P.2d 135 (1980).