Cluster 1420373

green · 38 citation events across 11 courts. Showing the 11 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 11

green Karalis v. Carn (2025)

Rule Authority · D. Nev.

Ins., 971 P.2d 798, 799 (Nev. 1998), as modified on 21 denial of reh’g (Mar. 19, 1999) (“[I]t would be illogical to begin the statute of limitations before the insured even has a justiciable claim for breach of contract.”); Mitman v. LA 1, LLC, Nos. 22 83350, 84031, 2023 WL 8270780 , at *1 (Nev. 2023) (“Mitman incorrectly bases the statute of limitation accrual on the date the [agreements] were executed; however, the operative accrual 23 date is the date Mitman breached the …

green The Bank of New York Mellon v. Stewart Information Services Corporation (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Nev.

Ins., 971 P.2d 798, 800 (Nev. 1998).

green Nationwide Mut. Insurance v. Shilling (2020)

Rule Authority · Md. · 2 citations in this opinion

Additionally, the equitable remedy of laches would protect insurers from the costs associated with any unreasonable delay on the part of the insured. 971 P.2d 798, 800 (Nev. 1998) (citations omitted).

citations omitted

green Roash v. Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut (2020)

Rule Authority · D. Nev.

Ins., 971 P.2d 798, 800 (Nev. 1998), as modified on denial of reh’g (Mar. 19, 1999)) 18 (finding that a policy provision’s time limitation for claims based on underinsured/uninsured 19 motorist benefits was unenforceable based on public policy grounds), with Walker v. Am. 20 Bankers Ins.

green Maxwell Williams v. Travelers Home & Marine Ins Co (2018)

Rule Authority · 9th Cir.

Ins., 971 P.2d 798, 800 (Nev. 1998); see also Walker v. Am.

green Shada v. Farmers Ins. Exch. (2013)

Rule Authority · Neb.

Ins., 114 Nev. 1379, 1381 , 971 P.2d 798, 799 (1998).

green American States Insurance Company v. Joann LaFlam (2013)

Rule Authority · R.I.

Therefore, the issue of when a UM/ UIM cause of action accrues is one of first impression in this jurisdiction. “‘[T]he overwhelming majority of * * * jurisdictions [that have considered this issue] have concluded that the limitations period begins to run on a UIM claim upon the insurer’s breach of the insurance contract’ rather than the date of the accident.” LaFlam, 672 F.3d at 43 (quoting Grayson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 114 Nev. 1379 , 971 P.2d 798, 799…

green American States Insurance v. LaFlam (2012)

Rule Authority · 1st Cir.

Ins., 114 Nev. 1379 , 971 P.2d 798, 799 (1998), modified on denial ofreh’g (Nev.1999); see, e.g., Shelter Mut.

green State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Fitts (2004)

Rule Authority · Nev. · 3 citations in this opinion

Ins., 114 Nev. 1379, 1382 , 971 P.2d 798, 800 (1998) (quoting Green v. Selective Ins.

green Hamm v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co. (2000)

Rule Authority · Iowa

Ins., 114 Nev. 1379 , 971 P.2d 798, 800 (1998) (limitations period runs from date insurer denies payment of insured’s UIM claim); Metropolitan Property & Liab.

limitations period runs from date insurer denies payment of insured’s UIM claim

green Wille v. Geico Casualty Co. (2000)

Rule Authority · Okla.

Ins., 114 Nev. 1379 , 971 P.2d 798, 799 (1998) [Limitation period did not began to run until insurer denied underinsured motorist benefits.]; Metropolitan Property & Liability Ins.