Cluster 1426938
green
· 60 citation events
across 3 courts.
Showing the 9 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green
State v. Barnett (2019)
One might reasonably ask how then, given that history, we arrived at a decision upholding the inventory of a briefcase—precisely the scenario rejected by Keller and Atkinson—in State v. Johnson, 153 Or App 535, 540 , 958 P2d 887 , rev den, 327 Or 554 (1998) (“[T]he briefcase and the coin purse in this case * * * are typically used to store valu- ables in the same way as a purse or a wallet.”).
“[T]he briefcase and the coin purse in this case * * * are typically used to store valu- ables in the same way as a purse or a wallet.”
green
State v. Wilcox (2024)
It was questioned again in this court’s en banc deci- sion in Johnson, 153 Or App at 546-50 (Armstrong, Landau, Haselton, and Wolheim, JJ., dissenting).
Armstrong, Landau, Haselton, and Wolheim, JJ., dissenting
green
State v. Wilcox (2024)
It was questioned again in this court’s en banc deci- sion in Johnson, 153 Or App at 546-50 (Armstrong, Landau, Haselton, and Wolheim, JJ., dissenting).
Armstrong, Landau, Haselton, and Wolheim, JJ., dissenting
green
United States v. Cagle (2002)
He argues that the search was illegal because the Medford Police Department’s inventory search policy directed officers to open closed containers that were not primarily intended to be used to store valuables, in violation of State v. Johnson, 153 Or.App. 535 , 958 P.2d 887, 890 (Or.Ct.App.1998) (en banc).
green
State v. Sanchez (2024)
See State v. Johnson, 153 Or App 535, 539 , 958 P2d 887 , rev den, 327 Or 554 (1998) (“Assuming without deciding that the trial court’s ruling about the officer’s observation at the scene of the arrest is error, it is harmless.
green
State v. Sanchez (2024)
See State v. Johnson, 153 Or App 535, 539 , 958 P2d 887 , rev den, 327 Or 554 (1998) (“Assuming without deciding that the trial court’s ruling about the officer’s observation at the scene of the arrest is error, it is harmless.
green
State v. Weems (2003)
See generally State v. Johnson, 153 Or App 535, 542-43 , 958 P2d 887 , rev den, 327 Or 554 (1998) (explaining why inventory issues generally should not be considered in the first instance on appeal).
explaining why inventory issues generally should not be considered in the first instance on appeal
green
State v. Johnson (1998)
See 153 Or.App. at 540 , 958 P.2d at 890 . [8] A briefcase is defined as "a flat flexible case usu[ally] with a handle that is designed to carry legal briefs or other papers." Webster's Third New International Dictionary 277 (unabridged ed.1993)
green
State v. Gonzalez (2018)
See, e.g. , State v. Johnson , 153 Or.
concluding that, even if trial court's denial of suppression motion was error, the error was harmless because challenged evidence had not been introduced in defendant's trial and had not led to derivative evidence