How cited: Cluster 1469158 · Go Syfert

Cluster 1469158

green · 15 citation events across 8 courts. Showing the 12 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · N.D. Tex.
Delay alone is an insufficient basis to deny leave to amend, and delay must be “undue, i.e., it must prejudice the nonmoving party or impos[e] unwarranted burdens on the court.” In re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISA Litigation, 610 F. Supp.2d 600, 653 (S.D.
quoting Mayeaux v. Louisiana Health Service and Indemnity Co., 376 F.3d 420, 427 (5th Cir. 2004)
Rule Authority · N.D. Tex.
Delay alone is an insufficient basis to deny leave to amend, and delay must be “undue, i.e., it must prejudice the nonmoving party or impos[e] unwarranted burdens on the court.” In re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISA Litigation, 610 F. Supp.2d 600, 653 (S.D.
quoting Mayeaux v. Louisiana Health Service and Indemnity Co., 376 F.3d 420, 427 (5th Cir. 2004)
Rule Authority · N.D. Tex.
Delay alone is an insufficient basis to deny leave to amend, and delay must be “undue, i.e., it must prejudice the nonmoving party or impos[e] unwarranted burdens on the court.” In re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISA 9 Litigation, 610 F. Supp.2d 600, 653 (S.D.
quoting Mayeaux v. Louisiana Health Service and Indemnity Co., 376 F.3d 420, 427 (5th Cir. 2004)
Rule Authority · N.D. Tex.
Delay alone is an insufficient basis to deny leave to amend, and delay must be “undue, i.e., it must prejudice the nonmoving party or impos[e] unwarranted burdens on the court.” In re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISA 15 Litigation, 610 F. Supp.2d 600, 653 (S.D.
quoting Mayeaux v. Louisiana Health Service and Indemnity Co., 376 F.3d 420, 427 (5th Cir. 2004)
Rule Authority · N.D. Tex.
Delay alone is an insufficient basis to deny leave to amend, and delay must be “undue, i.e., it must prejudice the nonmoving party or impos[e] unwarranted burdens on the court.” In re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISA Litigation, 610 F.Supp.2d 600, 653 (S.D.Tex. 2009)(emphasis in original)(quoting Mayeaux v. Louisiana Health Service and Indemnity Co., 376 F.3d 420, 427 (5th Cir. 2004)).
emphasis in original
Rule Authority · D. Colo.
“A litigant’s failure to assert a claim as soon as he could have is properly a factor to be considered in deciding whether to grant leave to amend.” In re Enron Corp. Sec., Derivative & ERISA Litig., 610 F.Supp.2d 600, 663 (S.D.
Rule Authority · E.D. Tex.
Chestman, 947 F.2d at 567 ; In re Enron Corp., 610 F.Supp.2d 600, 649 (S.D.
holding that “unilateral expectations ... do not give rise to ... a duty to disclose”
Rule Authority · S.D.W. Va
The failure to state a claim “is usually challenged by a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6), [but] it may also serve as a basis for summary judgment.” In re: Enron Corp. Sec., Derivative & ERISA Litigation, 610 F.Supp.2d 600, 607 (S.D.Tex.2009) (citing Whalen v. Carter, 954 F.2d 1087, 1098 (5th Cir.1992)); Ritter v. Dalton, 129 F.3d 117 (4th Cir.1997) (unpublished) (“[T]he district court properly granted summary judgment for ... failure to state a claim upon which relief …
Rule Authority · S.D.W. Va
In a summary judgment context, the failure to state a claim is the ‘functional equivalent’ of the failure to raise a genuine issue of material fact.’ ” In re Enron Corp. Sec., Derivative & ERISA Litig., 610 F.Supp.2d 600, 607 (S.D.Tex.2009) (citing Whalen v. Carter, 954 F.2d 1087, 1098 (5th Cir.1992)).
green Cohen v. Stevanovich (2010)
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
In re Enron Corp. Sec., Derivative & ERISA Litig., 610 F.Supp.2d 600, 607 (S.D.Tex. 2009).
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Newby v. Enron Corp. (In re Enron Corp. Secs.), 610 F. Supp. 2d 600 (S.D.
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See In re Enron Corp. Sec., Derivative & ERISA Litig., 610 F.Supp.2d 600, 607 (S.D.Tex.2009) (“While 'failure to state a claim’ is usually challenged by a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6), it also may serve as a basis for summary judgment.