Cluster 147103
green
· 13 citation events
across 4 courts.
Showing the 12 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green
CC Oldco Corporation (2021)
Article III of the Constitution restricts the Judicial Power of the United States to “cases” and “controversies,” and prevents federal courts from deciding “questions that cannot affect the rights of litigants in the case before them.” Unalachtigo Band of the Nanticoke Lenni Lenape Nation v. Corzine, 606 F.3d 126, 129 (3d Cir. 2010) (quoting North Carolina v. Rice, 404 U.S. 244, 246 , 92 S. Ct. 402 , 30 L.Ed.2d 413 (1971)) (internal quotations omitted).
quoting North Carolina v. Rice, 404 U.S. 244, 246 , 92 S. Ct. 402 , 30 L.Ed.2d 413 (1971)
green
Bath Iron Works Corporation v. CC Oldco Corporation (2021)
Article III of the Constitution restricts the Judicial Power of the United States to “cases” and “controversies,” and prevents federal courts from deciding “questions that cannot affect the rights of litigants in the case before them.” Unalachtigo Band of the Nanticoke Lenni Lenape Nation v. Corzine, 606 F.3d 126, 129 (3d Cir. 2010) (quoting North Carolina v. Rice, 404 U.S. 244, 246 , 92 S. Ct. 402 , 30 L.Ed.2d 413 (1971)) (internal quotations omitted).
quoting North Carolina v. Rice, 404 U.S. 244, 246 , 92 S. Ct. 402 , 30 L.Ed.2d 413 (1971)
green
Hudson City Savings Bank v. Anita Barrow (2020)
We will dismiss the appeal.1 “Article III extends the Judicial Power of the United States only to ‘cases’ and ‘controversies.’” Unalachtigo Band of Nanticoke Lenni Lenape Nation v. Corzine, 606 F.3d 126, 129 (3d Cir. 2010).
green
James Coppedge v. (2020)
“Article III extends the Judicial Power of the United States only to ‘cases’ and ‘controversies.’” Unalachtigo Band of Nanticoke Lenni Lenape Nation v. Corzine, 606 F.3d 126, 129 (3d Cir. 2010).
green
United States v. Mark Wright (2019)
“Article III extends the Judicial Power of the United States only to ‘cases’ and ‘controversies.’” Unalachtigo Band of Nanticoke Lenni Lenape Nation v. Corzine, 606 F.3d 126, 129 (3d Cir. 2010).
green
Hudson City Savings Bank v. Anita Barrow (2019)
We will dismiss the appeal as moot.1 “Article III extends the Judicial Power of the United States only to ‘cases’ and ‘controversies.’” Unalachtigo Band of Nanticoke Lenni Lenape Nation v. Corzine, 606 F.3d 126, 129 (3d Cir. 2010).
green
Regency Finance Co. v. Trichilo (In re Trichilo) (2015)
Unalachtigo Band of the Nanticoke Lenni Lenape Nation v. Corzine, 606 F.3d 126, 129 (3d Cir.2010).
green
Richard Olivares v. Donna Zickefoose (2010)
“Article III [of the Constitution] extends the Judicial Power of the United States only to ‘cases’ and ‘controversies.’ ” Unalachtigo Band of Nanticoke Lenni Lenape Nation v. Corzine, 606 F.3d 126, 129 (3d Cir.2010).
green
Donovan Moncrieffe v. John Yost (2010)
“Article III [of the Constitution] extends the Judicial Power of the United States only to ‘cases’ and ‘controversies.’ ” Unalachtigo Band of Nanticoke Lenni Lenape Nation v. Corzine, 606 F.3d 126, 129 (3d Cir.2010).
green
Angelina Nkoli Okwuego v. Jason L. Pope (2024)
See Stevens v. Osuna, 877 F.3d 1293, 1304 (11th Cir. 2017). 2 Lenape Nation v. Corzine, 606 F.3d 126, 129 (3d Cir. 2010).
green
In re Cubic Energy, Inc. (2018)
Id. ; see Unalachtigo , 606 F.3d at 129 (quoting Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env't , 523 U.S. 83 , 94, 118 S.Ct. 1003 , 140 L.Ed.2d 210 (1998) ); Chafin , 568 U.S. at 172 , 133 S.Ct. 1017 (quoting Lewis v. Cont'l Bank Corp. , 494 U.S. 472 , 477, 110 S.Ct. 1249 , 108 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990) ) ("Article III ... restricts the power of federal courts to 'Cases' and 'Controversies.' Accordingly, to invoke the jurisdiction of a federal court, a litigant must have suffered, or be…
green
Leslie Mollett v. Leicth (2013)
Thus, determining constitutional “subject-matter jurisdiction necessarily precedes a ruling on the merits.” Ruhrgas AG v. Marathon Oil Co., 526 U.S. 574, 584 , 119 S.Ct. 1563 , 143 L.Ed.2d 760 (1999); see also Unala-chtigo Band of the Nanticoke Lenni Lenape Nation v. Corzine, 606 F.3d 126, 130 (3d Cir.2010) (observing that an advisory opinion issued in the absence of jurisdiction “ignore[d] the dictates of Article III”); Burkey v. Marberry, 556 F.3d 142, 149 (3d Cir.2009). *…