How cited: Cluster 1488043 · Go Syfert

Cluster 1488043

green · 55 citation events across 13 courts. Showing the 19 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.
NAACP v. WMC, 453 F.Supp. at 280, 292.
Rule Authority · W.D. Ark.
In short, “the suspension of federal aid was a sword which Congress cautioned the agencies to wield judiciously; it was envisioned as a weapon of last resort, designed to provide government agencies with leverage in their efforts to secure compliance with the statute.” NAACP v. Wilmington Medical Center, 453 F.Supp. 280, 293 (D.C.Del.1978), rev’d on other grounds, 599 F.2d 1247 (3d Cir. 1979).
Rule Authority · D.D.C.
Therefore, because the MSB’s final opinion adequately discloses the factors considered by the MSB and because the affidavits offer little, if anything new, see NAACP v. Wilmington Medical Center, Inc., 453 F.Supp. 280, 305-06 (D.Del.1978), rev’d on other grounds, 599 F.2d 1247 (3rd Cir. 1979), this Court will not consider plaintiffs’ affidavits.
Rule Authority · D. Colo.
Accord Doe v. Colautti, 454 F.Supp. 621, 629 (E.D.Pa. 1978), aff'd 592 F.2d 704 (3d Cir. 1979); NAACP v. Wilmington Medical Center, Inc., 453 F.Supp. 280, 297-298 (D.Del.1978), rev'd on other grounds, 599 F.2d 1247 (3d Cir. 1979).
Rule Authority · D. Colo.
Accord Doe v. Colautti, 454 F.Supp. 621, 629 (E.D.Pa. 1978), aff’d 592 F.2d 704 (3d Cir. 1979); NAACP v. Wilmington Medical Center, Inc., 453 F.Supp. 280, 297-298 (D.Del.1978), rev’d on other grounds, 599 F.2d 1247 (3d Cir. 1979).
Rule Authority · D. Del. · 2 citations in this opinion
NAACP v. WMC, Inc., 453 F.Supp. 280, 286-87, n.14 (D.Del. 1978).
Rule Authority · 3rd Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Rather, the court directed HEW to treat the plaintiffs' Complaint as "information" sufficient to require HEW to initiate the compliance investigation and review mandated by section 602. 7 In its Opinion of April 7, 1978, affirming HEW's ultimate determination, the district court reviewed its January 19 Order and explained: 5 The decision to instruct the Secretary to develop the factual record on plaintiffs' complaint and to exercise his discretion in reviewing Plan Omega, re…
Rule Authority · 3rd Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Rather, the court directed HEW to treat the plaintiffs’ Complaint as “information” sufficient to require HEW to initiate the compliance investigation and review mandated by section 602. 7 In its Opinion of April 7, 1978, affirming HEW’s ultimate determination, the district court reviewed its January 19 Order and explained: The decision to instruct the Secretary to develop the factual record on plaintiffs’ complaint and to exercise his discretion in reviewing Plan Omega, refl…
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y. · 2 citations in this opinion
To the same effect is NAACP v. Wilmington Medical Center, Inc., 453 F.Supp. 280, 304 (D.Del. 1978), where the court held that deference to Title Vi’s administrative process required that the standard of judicial review be whether the agency action was “arbitrary, capricious, an'abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law” 20 and not whether the court, in a trial de novo, would have concluded that there had been unlawful discrimination.
Rule Authority · D. Del.
For a more detailed description of Plan Omega, see NAACP v. Wilmington Medical Center, Inc., 453 F.Supp. 280, 285-288 (D.Del.1978). 2 .
Rule Authority · D. Del. · 4 citations in this opinion
NAACP v. Wilmington Medical Center, Inc., 453 F.Supp. 280 at 306-330 (D.Del.
Cited · D. Minnesota · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See NAACP v. Wilmington Medical Center, Inc., 453 F.Supp. at 306 .
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See NAACP v. Wilmington Medical Center, Inc., 599 F.2d 1247 , 1248 n. 4 (3d Cir.1979), aff'd in relevant part, 453 F.Supp. 280 , later proceeding, 453 F.Supp. 330 (D.Del.1978), (affirming district court determination that hospital’s receipt of Medicare, Medicaid and unspecified “other” assistance triggered Section 504 and Title VI); United States v. University Hospital of SUNY at Stony Brook, 575 F.Supp. 607 (EDNY 1983), aff'd on other grounds, 729 F.2d 144 (2d Cir.1984) (le…
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See NAACP v. Wilmington Medical Center, Inc., 453 F.Supp. 280 (D.Del.1978). .
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See N.A.A.C.P. v. Wilmington Medical Center, Inc., 453 F.Supp. 280 (D.Del.1978), rev'd, N.A.A.C.P. v. Medical Center, Inc., 599 F.2d 1247 (3d Cir. 1979); Michigan Paralyzed Veterans of America v. Coleman, 451 F.Supp. 7 (E.D.
Cited · SCOTUS · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See NAACP v. Wilmington Medical Center, 453 F. Supp. 280, 300 (Del. 1978).
Cited (see also) · N.D. Ill. · signal: see also
See also Montgomery Improvement Association, Inc. v. H.U.D., 645 F.2d 291 (5th Cir.1981), NAACP v. Wilmington Medical Center, 453 F.Supp. 280 (D.Del.1978).
Cited (see also) · 3rd Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., 453 F.Supp. at 321, 325. 46 The district court further found that the agreement 47 constitutes a binding and specifically enforceable contract ... which obligate(s) WMC to modify and supplement those particular features of Plan Omega which HEW believes will otherwise have a discriminatory effect. 48 NAACP v. WMC, 453 F.Supp. at 280, 292. 49 The district court, in focusing on the fact that after the Supplemental Agreement was executed the plaintiffs amended their c…
green Bryan v. Koch (1980)
Cited (see also) · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e. g., NAACP v. Wilmington Medical Center, 453 F.Supp. 280, 308 (D.Del.1978), rev’d and remanded on other grounds, 599 F.2d 1247 (3d Cir. 1979).