Cluster 1570664
green
· 16 citation events
across 7 courts.
Showing the 9 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
See Perrian v. O’Grady, 958 F.2d 192, 195 (7th Cir. 1992) (“Because substantive amendments shortly before trial serve to defeat the public’s interest in speedy resolution of legal disputes, [a] district court judge is entitled, in such circumstances, to refuse to allow a plaintiff’s amendment.”) (internal citations and quotations omitted); Fry v. UAL Corp., 895 F. Supp. 1018 , 1051–52 (N.D.
“It must also be noted that district courts must retain broad discretion to avoid consciously planned piecemeal litigation in order to manage their dockets.”
green
Cory Stallings v. Southwestern Illinois College (2025)
However, because “[t]he filing of an amended complaint has the effect of superseding the original complaint,” Fry v. UAL Corp., 895 F. Supp. 1018, 1048 (N.D.
Even if the Court had not dismissed Eldridge and Scharfinski’s original complaint (see Doc. 9), “[t]he filing of an amended complaint has the effect of superseding the original complaint.” Fry v. UAL Corp., 895 F. Supp. 1018, 1048 (N.D.
holding that an argument is not sufficiently pled when supported by factual allegations in an original complaint but not the amended complaint
green
Goldberg v. 401 North Wabash Venture LLC (2012)
Cf. Saif v. Holder, 452 Fed.Appx. 631, 632 (6th Cir.2011) (“when combined with [the witness’] lack of credibility and documentary evidence, these facts are more compelling”); Marion County Coroner’s Office v. E.E.O.C., 612 F.3d 924, 930 (7th Cir.2010) (“[The defendant’s] lack of credibility, combined with his stated preference for employing African-Americans and his actions taken in furtherance of that goal, was sufficient for the EEOC to find that [the plaintiff] was subjec…
green
In Re St. Jude Medical, Inc., Securities Litigation (2009)
Litig., 228 F.R.D. 221, 228 (D.N.J.2005) (allowing plaintiffs to add new statements to the amended complaint, after defendants filed for summaxy judgment, “would surely prejudice Defendants”); Fry v. UAL Corp., 895 F.Supp. 1018, 1050 (N.D.Ill.1995) (finding plaintiffs “unduly delayed in seeking to amend their amended complaint to properly allege a duty to update claim”).
green
Ostler v. Codman Research (1999)
See, e.g., Pelletier v. Stuart-James Co., 863 F.2d 1550, 1555 (11th Cir. 1989) ("Accordingly, a person who alleges a violation of Rule 10b-5 must demonstrate that he is an actual purchaser or seller, or that he was party to a legally enforceable contract to purchase or sell securities."); Fry v. UAL Corp., 895 F. Supp. 1018, 1031 (N.D. 111. 1995) (protection of securities laws limited to actual participants in securities markets including options); Chariot Group v. American …
protection of securities laws limited to actual participants in securities markets including options
green
In Re Discovery Zone Securities Litigation (1996)
Nisbet v. Van Tuyl, 224 F.2d 66, 71 (7th Cir.1995); Fry v. UAL Corp., 895 F.Supp. 1018, 1048 (N.D.Ill.1995), aff 'd, 84 F.3d 936 (7th Cir.1996). 5 .
green
Wafra Leasing Corp. 1999-A-1 v. Prime Capital Corp. (2002)
See Fry v. UAL Corp., 895 F.Supp. 1018, 1043 (N.D.Ill.1995) (Castillo, J.) (“[T]he mere fact that the conduct complained of involves a breach of fiduciary duty does not, alone, preclude a cognizable claim under the federal securities laws.”); see also Deleo v. Swirsky, No. 00 C 6917, 2001 WL 687458 (N.D.Ill.
green
Anderson v. Abbott Laboratories (2001)
Id.; see also Fry v. UAL Corp., 895 F.Supp. 1018 , 1046 n. 26 (N.D.Ill.1995); cf. Healthcare Compare, 75 F.3d at 282 (discussing duty to correct where circumstances which made statements false arose prior to the statements).