Cluster 1663753

green · 7 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 6 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 6

green Hammond v. Hall (2009)

Rule Authority · 11th Cir.

See Ivy v. State, 731 So.2d 601, 603 (Miss.1999) (sentence exceeding statutory maximum is error affecting fundamental constitutional rights); Crotts v. State, 795 So.2d 1020, 1021 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (sentencing error violates substantive due process).

sentencing error violates substantive due process

green Sult v. State (2010)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Crotts v. State, 795 So.2d 1020, 1021 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

green Morgan v. State (2003)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Crotts v. State, 795 So.2d 1020 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Marciniak v. State, 754 So.2d 877 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); DeSantis v. State, 400 So.2d 525 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

green Johnson v. State (2002)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Crotts v. State, 795 So.2d 1020 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). .

green Isom v. State (2001)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Crotts v. State, 795 So.2d 1020 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Lawton v. State, 731 So.2d 60 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)(holding substantive due process requires patently illegal sentence be corrected despite the law of case doctrine).

green Robinson v. State (2002)

Cited (see also) · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see also

See also Crotts v. State, 795 So.2d 1020 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (rejecting application of successiveness and law-of-the-case doctrines to defendant’s challenge to an HFO sentence, because the supreme court had decided a case addressing the particular issue after the adverse decisions on his prior challenges, and had applied such case retroactively).