How cited: Crotts v. State · Go Syfert

Crotts v. State (2001)

green · 7 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 6 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 6
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green Hammond v. Hall (2009)
Rule Authority · 11th Cir.
See Ivy v. State, 731 So.2d 601, 603 (Miss.1999) (sentence exceeding statutory maximum is error affecting fundamental constitutional rights); Crotts v. State, 795 So.2d 1020, 1021 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (sentencing error violates substantive due process).
sentencing error violates substantive due process
green Sult v. State (2010)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Crotts v. State, 795 So.2d 1020, 1021 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).
green Morgan v. State (2003)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Crotts v. State, 795 So.2d 1020 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Marciniak v. State, 754 So.2d 877 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); DeSantis v. State, 400 So.2d 525 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).
green Robinson v. State (2002)
Cited (see also) · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see also
See also Crotts v. State, 795 So.2d 1020 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (rejecting application of successiveness and law-of-the-case doctrines to defendant’s challenge to an HFO sentence, because the supreme court had decided a case addressing the particular issue after the adverse decisions on his prior challenges, and had applied such case retroactively).
green Johnson v. State (2002)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Crotts v. State, 795 So.2d 1020 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). .
green Isom v. State (2001)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Crotts v. State, 795 So.2d 1020 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Lawton v. State, 731 So.2d 60 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)(holding substantive due process requires patently illegal sentence be corrected despite the law of case doctrine).