Cluster 1668984
green
· 8 citation events
across 3 courts.
Showing the 6 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green
Amanda P. v. Commissioner of Social Security (2026)
May 19, 2008) ("We think that the case must be remanded for the ALJ to consider plaintiff's claim that she cannot use public transportation and thus is incapable of finding and holding a job."); Andino v. Bowen, 665 F. Supp. 186, 192 (S.D.N.Y. 1987) (Indeed, in light of Andino's inability to take a bus or subway by herself, it is not only clear that Andino is unable to work, but it is hard to imagine how she could even get to work on a regular basis.")); see also Sease v. Co…
Indeed, in light of Andino's inability to take a bus or subway by herself, it is not only clear that Andino is unable to work, but it is hard to imagine how she could even get to work on a regular basis."
green
Bromm v. Commissioner of Social Security (2025)
Andino v. Bowen, 665 F. Supp. 186, 190 (S.D.N.Y. 1987).
green
Rivera v. Kijakazi (2023)
Nov. 29, 2006) (remanding so that ALJ could consider the impact of plaintiff’s “inability to use public transportation to travel to the jobs available to her”); Grubb v. Chater, 992 F. Supp. 634, 639-40 (S.D.N.Y. 1998) (remanding where ALJ ignored testimony and evidence related to plaintiff’s inability to travel via public transportation); Rivera v. Sullivan, 771 F. Supp. 1339, 1360 (S.D.N.Y. 1991) (remanding solely for calculation of benefits because record showed that plai…
“in light of [plaintiff]’s inability to take the bus or subway by herself, it is not only clear that [plaintiff] is unable to work, but it is hard to imagine how she could even get to work on a regular basis
green
Wilson v. Colvin (2016)
Thus, the ALJ again improperly relied on his own lay opinion.”) (internal citation to record omitted; brackets in original); Andino v. Bowen, 665 F.Supp. 186, 191 (S.D.N.Y. 1987) (“[T]he Secretary may not ‘substitute his or her own inferential judgment for a competent medical opinion, particularly where the ALJ’s judgment assumes some degree of medical expertise and would amount to rendering an expert medical opinion which is based on competence he or she does not possess.’”…
green
Gecevic v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (1995)
While the ALJ is not obligated to “reconcile explicitly every conflicting shred of medical testimony,” Fiorello v. Heckler, 725 F.2d 174, 176 (2d Cir.1983); Miles v. Harris, 645 F.2d 122, 124 (2d Cir.1981), he cannot simply selectively choose evidence in the record that supports his conclusions, Fiorello, 725 F.2d at 176 ; Andino v. Bowen, 665 F.Supp. 186, 190 (S.D.N.Y.1987) (citing Fiorello, id.). 1 The ALJ also seems to have failed to consider in his ruling a report favora…
green
Rivera v. Sullivan (1991)
Fiorello v. Heckler, 725 F.2d at 175-76 ; Andino v. Bowen, 665 F.Supp. 186, 190 (S.D.N.Y.1987).