How cited: Cluster 1681688 · Go Syfert

Cluster 1681688

green · 26 citation events across 12 courts. Showing the 24 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 24
green Guirlando v. Mitcham (2020)
Quote Authority · W.D. Ark.
Bureau of Prisons, 856 F. Supp. 832, 836 (S.D.N.Y. 1994)(“jail is not an entity that is amenable to suit”).
“jail is not an entity that is amenable to suit”
green Smith v. Heath Dickson (2019)
Quote Authority · W.D. Ark.
Bureau of Prisons, 856 F. Supp. 832, 836 (S.D.N.Y. 1994)(“jail is not an entity that is amenable to suit”).
“jail is not an entity that is amenable to suit”
green Marvel v. Barham (2019)
Quote Authority · W.D. Ark.
Bureau of Prisons, 856 F. Supp. 832, 836 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) (“jail is not an entity that is amenable to suit”); In re Scott County Master Docket, 672 F. Supp. 1152 , 1163 n. 1 (D.
“jail is not an entity that is amenable to suit”
green Cesar De La Garza v. Kandiyohi Cty. Jail (2001)
Quote Authority · 8th Cir.
Bureau of Prisons, 856 F.Supp. 832, 836 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) (“jail is not an entity that is amenable to suit”); In re Scott County Master Docket, 672 F.Supp. 1152 , 1163 n. 1 (D.Minn.1987) (sheriffs department is not legal entity subject to suit), aff'd, Myers v. Scott County, 868 F.2d 1017 (8th Cir.1989), we modify the dismissal to be without prejudice so that Mr. De La Garza may refile his complaint to name a suable entity or individual, cf. Monell v. Dept. of Soc.
“jail is not an entity that is amenable to suit”
green Yasir Qahtan Saud v. Felipe Martinez Jr., et al. (2025)
Rule Authority · W.D. La.
Leavenworth is not a legal entity suable for civil rights violations) (citing Marsden v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 856 F. Supp. 832, 836 (S.D.
green Lammers v. County of Phelps NE (2025)
Rule Authority · D. Neb.
Bureau of Prisons, 856 F.Supp. 832, 836 (S. D.
jails are not entities amenable to suit
green Lammers v. County of Phelps NE (2025)
Rule Authority · D. Neb.
Bureau of Prisons, 856 F.Supp. 832, 836 (S. D.
jails are not entities amenable to suit
green King v. Orange County Jail (2024)
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
Bureau of Prisons, 856 F. Supp. 832, 836 (S.D.N.Y.
Orange County Jail is not suable under Section 1983
green Pearson v. Wellpath Health Services (2024)
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
Bureau of Prisons, 856 F. Supp. 832, 836 (S.D.N.Y.
Orange County Jail is not suable under Section 1983
green Pearson v. Wellpath Health Services (2024)
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
Bureau of Prisons, 856 F. Supp. 832, 836 (S.D.N.Y.
Orange County Jail is not suable under Section 1983
green Richardson v. FMC Carswell (2023)
Rule Authority · N.D. Tex.
Leavenworth is not a legal entity suable for civil rights violations) (citing Marsden v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 856 F. Supp. 832, 836 (S.D.
green Smith v. Arrowood (2022)
Rule Authority · W.D.N.Y.
Bureau of Prisons, 856 F. Supp. 832, 835 (S.D.N.Y. 1994)), report and recommendation adopted, No. 20-CV-4392 (VEC), 2022 WL 873197 (S.D.N.Y.
green Latouche v. Dr. John Hammer (2022)
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
Bureau of Prisons, 856 F. Supp. 832, 836 (S.D.N.Y. 1994); see also Hall v. City of White Plains, 185 F. Supp. 2d 293, 303 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) (“Under New York law, departments which are merely administrative arms of a municipality do not have a legal identity separate and apart from the municipality and cannot sue or be sued.”); see also N.Y.
green Norman v. Carr (2021)
Rule Authority · N.D. Tex.
Leavenworth is not a legal entity suable for civil rights violations) (citing Marsden v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 856 F. Supp. 832, 836 (S.D.
green Garrison v. Carr (2021)
Rule Authority · N.D. Tex.
Leavenworth is not a legal entity suable for civil rights violations) (citing Marsden v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 856 F. Supp. 832, 836 (S.D.
green Thomas v. Barnstable County Correctional Facility (2021)
Rule Authority · D. Mass.
Bureau of Prisons, 856 F. Supp. 832, 836 (S.D.N.Y. 1994).
green Toliver v. Hopkins County Jail (2020)
Rule Authority · W.D. Ark. · 2 citations in this opinion
Bureau of Prisons, 856 F. Supp. 832, 836 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) (stating that a “jail is not an entity that is amenable to suit”); Powell v. Cook Cnty.
stating that a “jail is not an entity that is amenable to suit”
green Jaso v. Schlect (2020)
Rule Authority · D. Neb.
Bureau of Prisons, 856 F.Supp. 832, 836 (S. D.
jails are not entities amenable to suit
green Mixon v. Esch (2020)
Rule Authority · D. Neb.
Bureau of Prisons, 856 F.Supp. 832, 836 (S. D.
jails are not entities amenable to suit
green Webb v. Ricketts (2019)
Rule Authority · D. Neb.
Bureau of Prisons, 856 F.Supp. 832, 836 (S. D.
jails are not entities amenable to suit
green Washington v. McLean County Jail (2019)
Rule Authority · D.N.D.
Bureau of Prisons, 856 F. Supp. 832, 836 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) (the “jail is not an entity that is amenable to suit”); In re Scott County Master Docket, 672 F. Supp. 1152 , 1163 n. 1 (D.
the “jail is not an entity that is amenable to suit”
green United States v. Islip (1998)
Rule Authority · Ct. Intl. Trade
See, e.g., Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 735 n. 4, 67 S.Ct. 1009 , 91 L.Ed. 1209 (1947) (“when a question of the District Court’s jurisdiction is raised ... the court may inquire by affidavits or otherwise, into the facts as they exist.”); Marsden v. Federal B.O.P., 856 F.Supp. 832, 835 (S.D.N.Y.1994) (“On a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, lack of personal jurisdiction, or insufficiency of service of process, consideration of matters outside the p…
green Williams v. Gordon (INMATE 3) (2021)
Cited · M.D. Ala. · signal: see
Dean v. Barber, 951 F.2d 1210, 1214 (11th Cir.1992); see Marsden v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 856 F. Supp. 832, 836 (S.D.N.Y. 1994).
green Lakeria Montgomery v. Mobile County Sheriff’s Office et al. (2026)
Cited (see also) · S.D. Ala. · signal: see also
Ala. Feb. 27, 2015); see also Marsden v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 856 F.Supp. 832, 836 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) (finding that the jail is not an entity amenable to suit).
finding that the jail is not an entity amenable to suit