How cited: Cluster 1689914 · Go Syfert

Cluster 1689914

green · 202 citation events across 6 courts. Showing the 29 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · M.D. La.
Lasyone v. Kansas City S. R.R., 786 So. 2d 682, 689 (La. 2001).
Rule Authority · E.D. La.
P'ship, 342 F.3d 416, 420 (5th Cir. 2003)) (citing Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern Railroad, 786 So.2d 682, 691 (La.2001); Adams v. Traina, 830 So.2d 526, 533 (La.App. 2 Cir.2002)). member Robert Autenreith as evidence that FSW did not rely on LaPorte’s audit reports when making decisions.
Rule Authority · W.D. La.
Co., 786 So.2d 682, 691 (La. 2001).
Rule Authority
City S. R.R., 786 So.2d 682, 688 (La.
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.
That “an accident occurred because of a vice or defect does not elevate the condition of the thing to that of an unreasonably dangerous defect.” Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern R.R., 786 So.2d 682, 694 (La.2001).
green Orrill v. Orrill (2009)
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.
“The rule that questions of credibility are for the trier of fact applies to the evaluation of expert testimony, unless the stated reasons of the expert are patently unsound.” Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern Railroad, 2000-2628, p. 13 (La.4/3/01), 786 So.2d 682, 693 (citation omitted).
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.
The reviewing court must always keep in mind that, “if the trial court or jury’s findings are reasonable in light of the record reviewed in its entirety, the court of appeal may not reverse, even if convinced that had it been sitting as the trier of fact, it would have weighed the evidence differently.” Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern Railroad, *225 786 So.2d 682, 688 (La.2001).
Rule Authority · La.
Civ.Code art. 2317.1 to require knowledge or constructive knowledge, "the Legislature effectively eliminated strict liability under Article 2317, turning it into a negligence claim." Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern R.R., 00-2628, p. 6 (La.4/3/01), 786 So.2d 682, 689, fn. 9 ( quoting Frank L.
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.
In Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern Railroad, 00-2628, p. 9 (La.4/3/01), 786 So.2d 682, 691 (citations omitted), the supreme court explained the concept of cause-in-fact, stating: A party’s conduct is a cause-in-fact of the harm if it was a substantial factor in bringing about the harm.
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.
In Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern Railroad, 00-2628, p. 9 (La.4/3/01), 786 So.2d 682, 691 (citations omitted), the supreme court explained the concept of cause-in-fact, stating: A party's conduct is a cause-in-fact of the harm if it was a substantial factor in bringing about the harm.
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.
R.R., 00-2628, pp. 14-15 (La.4/3/01), 786 So.2d 682, 694 (emphasis added) (citations omitted).
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.
In Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern Railroad, 00-2628, p. 9 (La.4/3/01), 786 So.2d 682, 691 (citations omitted), the supreme court reviewed the concept of cause-in-fact, stating: A party’s conduct is a cause-in-fact of the harm if it was a substantial factor in bringing about the harm.
Rule Authority · 5th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern Railroad, 786 So.2d 682, 691 (La.2001); Adams v. Traina, 830 So.2d 526, 533 (La.App. 2 Cir.2002).
Rule Authority · La.
Id. at 694 (citations omitted) (emphasis added).
citations omitted
green Darbone v. State (2002)
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.
In Lasyone, 786 So.2d at 691 (citations omitted), the supreme court reviewed the concept of cause-in-fact, stating: A party's conduct is a cause-in-fact of the harm if it was a substantial factor in bringing about the harm.
citations omitted
Cited · La. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern R.R., 2000-2628 (La. 4/3/01), 786 So.2d 682 , 698.
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See id. art. 655 (“An estate situated below is bound to receive the surface waters that flow naturally from an estate situated above unless an act of man has created the flow.”). 56 .
Cited · La. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern Railroad, 2000-2628 (La. 4/3/01), 786 So.2d 682, 690 .
Cited · La. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern R.R., 00-2628 (La.4/3/01), 786 So.2d 682, 694 .
green Dejoie v. Guidry (2011)
Cited · La. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern R.R., 00-2628, p. 13 (La.4/3/01), 786 So.2d 682, 693 ; Katner v. Katner, 09-0974, p. 6 (La.App. 4 Cir. 12/23/09), 28 So.3d 566, 572 .
Cited · La. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See, Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern R.R., 00-2628 (La.4/3/01), 786 So.2d 682 ; Rue v. State, Dept. of Highways, 372 So.2d 1197 (La.1979).
green Lotridge v. Abril (2008)
Cited · La. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern R., 00-2628, p. 6 (La.4/3/01), 786 So.2d 682, 689 , at fn. 9.
green Adams v. Rhodia, Inc. (2008)
Cited · La. · signal: see
See Lasyone, 00-2628 at 13, 786 So.2d at 693 .
Cited · La. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Lasyone v. Kansas City S.R.R., 00-2628, p. 11 (La.4/3/01), 786 So.2d 682, 692 , wherein the supreme court noted that "it is well accepted that the trier of fact is charged with the determination of what credibility it assigns to expert witnesses and then to decide which expert among those testifying that it finds more credible." The photographs showing the resting place of the Francis vehicle between the police cruiser and Officer Garrie's truck were available for the tr…
Cited · La. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Lasyone v. Kansas City S. R.R., 00-2628 (La.4/3/01), 786 So.2d 682 .
Cited · La. · signal: see
See Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern R.R., 00-2628 (La.4/3/01), 786 So.2d 682, 693 (when findings are based on determinations regarding witness credibility, the manifest error/clearly wrong standard demands great deference to trier of fact's findings); Henderson, supra (where two permissible views of the evidence exist, the fact finder's choice between them cannot be manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong).
Cited (see also) · La. Ct. App. · signal: see also
See also Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern R.R ., 00-2628, p. 14 (La. 4/3/01), 786 So.2d 682 , 694 ("[t]he fact that an accident occurred because of a vice or defect does not elevate the condition of the thing to that of an unreasonably dangerous defect").
Cited (see also) · La. Ct. App. · signal: see also
See also Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern R.R ., 00-2628, p. 14 (La. 4/3/01), 786 So.2d 682 , 694 ("[t]he fact that an accident occurred because of a vice or defect does not elevate the condition of the thing to that of an unreasonably dangerous defect").
Cited (see also) · La. Ct. App. · signal: see also
See also, Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern R.R., 00-2628 (La.4/3/01), 786 So.2d 682, 688 .