Cluster 1781367
green
· 12 citation events
across 1 courts.
Showing the 6 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green
EARL W. JOHNSTON ROOFING, LLC. v. BARBARA HERNANDEZ (2020)
See Parsons, 751 So. 2d at 656 (“[W]here a final foreclosure judgment reserves jurisdiction to assess attorney’s fees, a defendant seeking to exercise the right of redemption need not tender an amount for attorney’s fees in order to be entitled to redemption”).
“[W]here a final foreclosure judgment reserves jurisdiction to assess attorney’s fees, a defendant seeking to exercise the right of redemption need not tender an amount for attorney’s fees in order to be entitled to redemption”
We denied the petition without prejudice to the lender’s ability to seek an increase of the redemption amount based on the “properly entered amended final judgment,” citing Verneret v. Foreclosure Advisors, LLC, 45 So. 3d 889, 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010), and Parsons v. Whitaker Plumbing of Boca Raton, Inc., 751 So. 2d 655, 657 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).
green
Sedra Family Ltd. Partnership v. 4750, LLC (2012)
Parsons v. Whitaker Plumbing of Boca Raton, Inc., 751 So.2d 655, 656 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).
green
Verneret v. Foreclosure Advisors, LLC (2010)
See Parsons v. Whitaker Plumbing of Boca Raton, Inc., 751 So.2d 655 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (stating that, where a final judgment reserves jurisdiction to assess attorney’s fees, a defendant seeking to exercise the right of redemption need not tender an amount for attorney’s fees in order to be entitled to redemption).
stating that, where a final judgment reserves jurisdiction to assess attorney’s fees, a defendant seeking to exercise the right of redemption need not tender an amount for attorney’s fees in order to be entitled to redemption
green
Stack v. Homeside Lending, Inc. (2003)
See Parsons v. Whitaker Plumbing of Boca Raton, Inc., 751 So.2d 655, 656 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (holding that the trial court may enter an amended final judgment for additional attorney's fees even after the mortgagor has validly redeemed the property if jurisdiction to do so has been reserved).
holding that the trial court may enter an amended final judgment for additional attorney's fees even after the mortgagor has validly redeemed the property if jurisdiction to do so has been reserved
See, e.g., Parsons, 751 So. 2d 655 (borrower’s exercise of redemption rights on the first foreclosure judgment “did not preclude the court from entering the second judgment.”).