In Re Bennett (1996)
green
· 23 citation events
across 11 courts.
Showing the 13 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199820122026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Sikirica v. Yanovich (In re Yanovich) (2016)
In this regard it has been stated that in addition to a self-serving statement of intent, the debtor must also demonstrate “a meaningful ability to occupy the property imminently or within a reasonable time.” In re Bennett, 192 B.R. 584, 588 (Bankr.D.Me.1996).
green
Genevievette Walker-Lightfoot (2024)
May 28, 1999); In re Bennett, 192 B.R. 584, n. 9 (Bankr.
green
Joseph W. Prestia (2024)
Since a self-serving statement of intent to reside in a particular location is insufficient to prove constructive occupancy, the debtor must also show he has a “meaningful ability to occupy the property imminently or within a reasonable time.” Id.; quoting In re Bennett, 192 B.R. 584, 588 (Bankr.
green
In re: Kathy Ellen Richards (2022)
Pa. 2016) (quoting In re Bennett, 192 B.R. 584, 588 (Bankr.
green
Agustin J Jaramillo and Lillian V Jaramillo (2020)
Yanovich, 544 B.R. at 312 (quoting In re Bennett, 192 B.R. 584, 588 (Bankr.
green
John L. Hychko and Shannon E. Hychko (2019)
In re Bennett, 192 B.R. 584, 587 (Bankr.
green
In Re Dailey (2007)
See In re Huffines, 57 B.R. 740, 741-42 (M.D.Tenn.1985) (denying homestead exemption in property on which no house stood and on which debtor had never resided); In re Bennett, 192 B.R. 584, 587-88 (Bankr.D.Me. 1996) (denying homestead exemption in unimproved property, despite efforts over several years to prepare lot for construction by clearing land, dumping and spreading fill, and extending water and sewer service); In re Cole, 185 B.R. 95, 97-98 (Bankr.D.Me. 1995) (denyin…
denying homestead exemption in unimproved property, despite efforts over several years to prepare lot for construction by clearing land, dumping and spreading fill, and extending water and sewer service
green
In Re DeMasi (1998)
Cf. In re Bennett, 192 B.R. 584, 585-88 (Bankr.D.Me.1996) (debtors had no concrete plans to build a home after a decade of ownership and a year after filing).
green
Christopher D. Gistis (2020)
See id. at 586-88 .
green
In re Tankersley (2017)
In re Feliciano, 487 B.R. at 52 (citing In re Lozada Rivera, 470 B.R. at 117 ); accord In re Bennett, 192 B.R. 584 , 587-88 n.16 (Bankr.
sustaining objection to state law residence exemption
green
In Re Toppi (2007)
See In re Bennett, 192 B.R. 584 , 586 n. 9 (Bankr.D.Me.1996) (citations omitted).
green
In Re Gandy (2005)
See In re Bennett, 192 B.R. 584, 588 (Bankr.D.Me.1996) (denying exemption for debtors who owned undeveloped land — on which they had made limited preparations for building — because they had not shown the intent or meaningful ability to occupy the property within the past ten years); see also In re Cole, 185 B.R. 95, 98 (Bankr.D.Me.1995) (denying exemption when debtor installed a septic system and had neither shown a definable intention to move onto the land nor a plan to ac…
green
In Re Lawrence (1999)
Both parties agree that the debtor’s right to the exemption was fixed as of the filing of the petition. 11 U.S.C. § 522 (b)(2)(A) (“an individual debtor may exempt ... property that is exempt ... on the date of the filing of the petition”); see also In re Bennett, 192 B.R. 584, 586 (Bankr.D.Me.1996) (analysis of exemption claim focuses on status as of petition date); In re Pancratz, 175 B.R. 85, 91 (D.Wyo.1994) (exemptions are determined as of date of filing). 8 The status o…