Cluster 2069774

green · 68 citation events across 6 courts. Showing the 12 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 12

green State v. Mastella L. Jackson (2016)

Rule Authority · Wis. · 2 citations in this opinion

Similarly, in Kennedy , the court of appeals cited Washington when phrasing the doctrine as follows: "[T]he fruits of an illegal search may be admitted if it can be shown by a preponderance of the evidence that the tainted fruits would have been inevitably discovered by lawful means." Kennedy, 134 Wis. 2d at 317 (concluding that a vodka bottle discovered in a vehicle would inevitably have been discovered during an inventory search even though it was actually discovered pursu…

concluding that a vodka bottle discovered in a vehicle would inevitably have been discovered during an inventory search even though it was actually discovered pursuant to a defective warrant

green State v. Townsend (2008)

Rule Authority · Wis. Ct. App.

Thus, noncompliance with [Wis. Stat. §] 343.305 did not render the blood test evidence inadmissible. *702 Kennedy, 134 Wis. 2d at 320 (emphasis added) (citations omitted). ¶ 15.

emphasis added

green State v. Heft (1993)

Rule Authority · Wis. Ct. App.

Id. at 322 , 396 N.W.2d at 770 (citations omitted). *832 Fundamental rights include the right to appeal a criminal conviction, Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12, 20 (1956) (Frankfurter, J., concurring); the right to vote, Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663, 670 (1966); and the right to procreate, Skinner v. Oklahoma ex rel.

citations omitted

green State v. Schwegler (1992)

Rule Authority · Wis. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

State v. Kennedy, 134 Wis. 2d 308, 317 , 396 N.W.2d 765, 768 (Ct. App. 1986).

green State v. Anderson (1991)

Rule Authority · Wis. Ct. App.

State v. Kennedy, 134 Wis. 2d 308, 318 , 396 N.W.2d 765, 768 (Ct. App. 1986).

green State v. Dyleski (1990)

Rule Authority · Wis. Ct. App.

Dyleski relies on State v. Kennedy, 134 Wis. 2d 308, 320 , 396 N.W.2d 765, 769 (Ct. App. 1986), holding that " [t]he manner and method of obtaining evidence is governed by the law of the jurisdiction in which the evidence is secured." Evidence obtained in violation of the law of the jurisdiction where it is secured is suppressible.

green State v. Wolske (1988)

Rule Authority · Wis. Ct. App.

State v. Kennedy, 134 Wis. 2d 308, 315 , 396 N.W.2d 765, 767 (Ct. App. 1986).

green State Ex Rel. Lank v. Rzentkowski (1987)

Rule Authority · Wis. Ct. App.

State v. *852 Kennedy, 134 Wis. 2d 308, 319 , 396 N.W.2d 765, 769 (Ct. App. 1986).

green State v. Moffett (2000)

Cited · Wis. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See State v. Kennedy, 134 Wis. 2d 308, 324 , 396 N.W.2d 765 (Ct. App. 1986). 14 State v. Kanarowski, 170 Wis. 2d 504, 515 , 489 N.W.2d 660 (Ct. App. 1992) (Nettesheim, P.J., concurring). 5 Under the rule, multiple punishments are permissible only if each offense requires proof of an additional element or fact which the other offense or offenses do not.

green State v. Wilson (1988)

Cited · Wis. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See State v. Kennedy, 134 Wis. 2d 308, 315 , 396 N.W.2d 765, 767 (Ct. App. 1986).

green United States v. Gerena (1987)

Cited · D. Conn. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Wisconsin v. Kennedy, 396 N.W.2d 765, 769 , 134 Wis.2d 308 (App.1986) (citing Desjarlais v. State, 243 N.W.2d 453, 459-62 , 73 Wis.2d 480, 491-98 (1976)) (“[t]he manner and method of obtaining evidence is governed by the law of the jurisdiction in which the evidence is secured____ [a] contrary conclusion would result in the unreasonable requirement that officials in one jurisdiction be aware of and implement the procedures adopted in a foreign jurisdiction”).

green State v. Weber (1991)

Cited (see also) · Wis. · signal: see also · 4 citations in this opinion

See also State v. Kennedy, 134 Wis. 2d 308, 318 , 396 N.W.2d 765 (Ct. App. 1986).