How cited: Cluster 2115153 · Go Syfert

Cluster 2115153

green · 98 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green People v. Long (2024)
Quote Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
People v. Anderson, 325 Ill.
“[N]o party may raise on appeal the failure to give any instruction unless he tendered it to the court.”
green People v. Gillyard (2021)
Quote Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see also
App. 3d 796, 800 (2007)); see also People v. Anderson, 325 Ill.
“a court is not required to give the defendant’s rehabilitative potential more weight than the seriousness of the offense”
green People v. Spencer (2021)
Quote Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see
See People v. Anderson, 325 Ill.
“consecutive sentencing does not increase any of defendant’s individual sentences for an offense beyond the statutory maximum, but determines the manner in which those sentences will be served.”
green People v. Green-Hosey (2019)
Quote Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see
See People v. Anderson, 325 Ill.
“consecutive sentencing does not increase any of defendant’s individual sentences for an offense beyond the statutory maximum, but determines the manner in which those sentences will be served”
green People v. Hawkins (2011)
Quote Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · 2 citations in this opinion
App. 3d 624, 638 , 759 N.E.2d 83, 95 (2001) (“consecutive sentencing does not increase any of defendant’s individual sentences for an offense beyond the statutory maximum, but determines the manner in which those sentences will be served”); see also People v. Phelps, 211 Ill. 2d 1, 14 , 809 N.E.2d 1214, 1222 (2004) (consecutive sentencing determines only the manner in which a defendant will serve his sentences for multiple offenses); People v. Avery, 321 Ill.
“consecutive sentencing does not increase any of defendant’s individual sentences for an offense beyond the statutory maximum, but determines the manner in which those sentences will be served”
green People v. Hawkins (2011)
Quote Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · 2 citations in this opinion
App. 3d 624, 638 , 759 N.E.2d 83, 95 (2001) (“consecutive sentencing does not increase any of defendant’s individual sentences for an offense beyond the statutory maximum, but determines the manner in which those sentences will be served”); see also People v. Phelps, 211 Ill. 2d 1, 14 , 809 N.E.2d 1214, 1222 (2004) (consecutive sentencing determines only the manner in which a defendant will serve his sentences for multiple offenses); People v. Avery, 321 Ill.
“consecutive sentencing does not increase any of defendant’s individual sentences for an offense beyond the statutory maximum, but determines the manner in which those sentences will be served”
green People v. Haley (2025)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 31, 55 (1993). “[I]t is presumed that the trial court considered the evidence in mitigation absent any contrary indication in the record.” People v. Anderson, 325 Ill.
green People v. France (2025)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
See Segara, 126 Ill. 2d at 77 ; People v. Anderson, 325 Ill.
green People v. Traynoff (2024)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 624, 637 , 759 N.E.2d 83, 94 (2001). ¶ 26 “On review, the sentence imposed by the trial court will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion.” Pina, 2019 IL App (4th) 170614 , ¶ 20.
green People v. Trevino (2024)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Even though aggravated criminal sexual assault has voluntary act elements of the use of force or threat of force, this court held that any of the three mental states are implied, citing People v. Anderson, 325 Ill.
green People v. Young (2024)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
People v. Anderson, 325 Ill.
green People v. Rydberg (2023)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 31, 55 (1993). “[I]t is presumed that the trial court considered the evidence in mitigation absent any contrary indication in the record.” People v. Anderson, 325 Ill.
green People v. Ward (2022)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
People v. Anderson, 325 Ill.
green People v. Green (2021)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 624, 637 , 759 N.E.2d 83, 95 (2001).
green People v. Smith (2021)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
People v. Anderson, 325 Ill.
green People v. Porter (2021)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
People v. Anderson, 325 Ill.
green In re Johnathan T. (2021)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
People v. Anderson, 325 Ill.
green In re Johnathan T. (2021)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
People v. Anderson, 325 Ill.
green People v. Wilks (2020)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
People v. Anderson, 325 Ill.
green People v. Rivera (2020)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
People v. Anderson, 325 Ill.
green People v. Wade (2020)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
People v. Anderson, 325 Ill.
green People v. Foots (2020)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
People v. Anderson, 325 Ill.
green People v. Bell (2020)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
See People v. Enoch, 122 Ill. 2d 176, 186 (1988); People v. Anderson, 325 Ill.
green People v. Thompson (2017)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 624, 636 , 759 N.E.2d 83, 93 (2001).
green People v. Thompson (2017)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 624, 636 , 759 N.E.2d 83, 93 (2001).
green People v. Means (2017)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
People v. Anderson, 325 Ill.
green People v. Means (2017)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
People v. Anderson, 325 Ill.
green People v. Chew (2016)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
People v. Anderson, 325 Ill.
green People v. Chew (2016)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
People v. Anderson, 325 Ill.
green People v. Clendenny (2016)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
People v. Anderson, 325 Ill.
green People v. Clendenny (2016)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
People v. Anderson, 325 Ill.
green People v. Childs (2011)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 624, 633 , 759 N.E.2d 83, 91 (2001).
green People v. Childs (2011)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 624, 633 , 759 N.E.2d 83, 91 (2001).
green People v. Williams (2008)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 624, 636 , 759 N.E.2d 83, 93 (2001) (failure to object to a jury instruction forfeits the issue on appeal).
failure to object to a jury instruction forfeits the issue on appeal
green People v. Williams (2008)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 624, 636 , 759 N.E.2d 83, 93 (2001) (failure to object to a jury instruction forfeits the issue on appeal).
failure to object to a jury instruction forfeits the issue on appeal
green People v. Denbo (2007)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 624, 634 , 759 N.E.2d 83, 92 (2001).
green People v. Denbo (2007)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · 2 citations in this opinion
See Janik, 127 Ill.2d at 401 , 130 Ill.Dec. 427 , 537 N.E.2d at 761 ; People v. Anderson, 325 Ill.App.3d 624, 634 , 259 Ill.Dec. 603 , 759 N.E.2d 83, 92 (2001).
green People v. Hestand (2005)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · 2 citations in this opinion
App. 3d 624, 638 , 759 N.E.2d 83, 95 (2001) (Cook, J., dissenting).
Cook, J., dissenting
green People v. Hestand (2005)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · 5 citations in this opinion
App. 3d 624, 638 , 759 N.E.2d 83, 95 (2001) (Cook, J., dissenting).
Cook, J., dissenting
green People v. Shaw (2004)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 624, 637 , 759 N.E.2d 83, 94 (2001).
green People v. Shaw (2004)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 624, 637 , 759 N.E.2d 83, 94 (2001).
green People v. Probst (2003)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 624, 636 , 759 N.E.2d 83, 93 (2001).
green People v. Probst (2003)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 624, 636 , 759 N.E.2d 83, 93 (2001).
green People v. Stiles (2002)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
People v. Anderson , 325 Ill.
green People v. Stiles (2002)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
People v. Anderson, 325 Ill.
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
People v. Anderson , 325 Ill.
green People v. Walker (2002)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
People v. Anderson, 325 Ill.
green People v. Craig (2002)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Therefore, a reviewing court will not substitute its judgment for that of the fact finder on questions involving the weight of the evidence or the credibility of the witnesses. [Citation.]" People v. Anderson , 325 Ill.
green People v. Craig (2002)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Therefore, a reviewing court will not substitute its judgment for that of the fact finder on questions involving the weight of the evidence or the credibility of the witnesses. [Citation.]” People v. Anderson, 325 Ill.
green People v. Ayers (2002)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 624, 637 , 759 N.E.2d 83, 94 (2001).