Cluster 2118369

green · 27 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 7 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 7

green People v. Timothy P. (2009)

Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.

Section 5 — 605 provides that prior to accepting a minor respondent’s guilty plea, the court must admonish the minor of the consequences of his plea and “the maximum penalty provided by law which may be imposed upon acceptance of the plea.” 705 ILCS 405/ 5 — 605(2)(a) (West 2006); In re D.R., 342 Ill.

green Doe v. Biang (2006)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.

Both Conn. Dep’t, 538 U.S. at 7-8, 123 S.Ct. 1160 and In re D.R., 342 Ill.App.3d at 516-17, 276 Ill.Dec. 638 , 794 N.E.2d at 891 -92 held that a sex offender has no right to a predeprivation hearing to prove that he or she is not currently dangerous, when dangerousness as such is not required for inclusion in the state statutory scheme.

green State v. Druktenis (2004)

Rule Authority · N.M. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

As a result, the defendant's attack on the classification at issue, the Court held, "must ultimately be analyzed in terms of substantive, not procedural, due process." Id. at 1165 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); see also Michael H. v. Gerald D., 491 U.S. 110, 120-21 , 109 S.Ct. 2333 , 105 L.Ed.2d 91 (1989) (explaining that the illegitimacy of certain legislative irrebuttable presumptions did not rest on procedural due process, but rather on "the adequacy of …

holding that, because notification law was based on conviction and not on dangerousness, procedural due process did not entitle a sex offender to an individualized hearing

green People ex rel. Z.B. (2008)

Cited · S.D. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion

See In re D.R., 342 Ill.App.3d 512 , 276 Ill.Dec. 638 , 794 N.E.2d 888, 892 (2003); In re J.R., 341 Ill.App.3d 784 , 275 Ill.Dec. 916 , 793 N.E.2d 687, 693 (2003).

green People, in Interest of Zb (2008)

Cited · S.D. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See In re D.R., 342 Ill.App.3d 512 , 276 Ill.Dec. 638 , 794 *604 N.E.2d 888, 892 (2003); In re J.R., 341 Ill.App.3d 784 , 275 Ill.Dec. 916 , 793 N.E.2d 687, 693 (2003).

green People v. Stanley (2006)

Cited · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see

See In re D.R., 342 Ill.

green People v. Stanley (2006)

Cited · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see

See In re D.R., 342 Ill.