Cluster 2139966

green · 26 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 5 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 5

green Danigeles v. Illinois Department of Financial & Professional Regulation (2015)

Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.

"Specific standards are desirable but not required to justify an agency's finding of a violation of statutory provisions [citations], even where the question may be one of first impression in an adjudicative context [citation] and, where appropriate, an agency may announce new principles or policies without resorting to formal rulemaking [citation]." Boffa v. Department of Public Aid, 168 Ill.

green Ogden Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Bower (2004)

Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.

Boffa v. Department of Public Aid , 168 Ill.

green Ogden Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Bower (2004)

Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.

Boffa v. Department of Public Aid, 168 Ill.

green Maun v. Department of Professional Regulation (1998)

Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · 2 citations in this opinion

App. 3d 139, 146 , 522 N.E.2d 644, 648-49 (1988) (specific standards not required to justify an agency’s finding of a violation of statutory provisions, even where the question may be one of first impression in an adjudicative context).

specific standards not required to justify an agency’s finding of a violation of statutory provisions, even where the question may be one of first impression in an adjudicative context

green Maun v. Department of Professional Regulation (1998)

Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · 2 citations in this opinion

App. 3d 139, 146 , 522 N.E.2d 644, 648-49 (1988) (specific standards not required to justify an agency's finding of a violation of statutory provisions, even where the question may be one of first impression in an adjudicative context).

specific standards not required to justify an agency's finding of a violation of statutory provisions, even where the question may be one of first impression in an adjudicative context