Cluster 2150044
green
· 6 citation events
across 4 courts.
Showing the 6 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
This charge, as slightly modified by the trial judge, read, “I charge you that pain alone can be disabling if a person is unable to work except by being in pain.” See Bryant v. Harris, 494 F. Supp. 932, 935 (D.S.C. 1980) (“It is well established that pain alone can be disabling within the Social Security Act.”).
“It is well established that pain alone can be disabling within the Social Security Act.”
green
Miyoshi v. Bowen (1988)
Since “the plaintiff’s entitlement is clear from the record and ... a remand would simply delay receipt of deserved benefits,” Bryant v. Harris, 494 F.Supp. 932, 933 (D.S.C.1980) (citing Grable v. Secretary of HEW, 442 F.Supp. 465 (W.D.N.Y.1977)), we reverse the Secretary’s decision and order that claimant be awarded the appropriate benefits.
green
Dixon v. Bowen (1988)
We reverse the decision of the Secretary as to this period, since “the plaintiff’s entitlement is clear from the record and ... a remand would simply delay receipt of deserved benefits.” Bryant v. Harris, 494 F.Supp. 932, 933 (D.S.C.1980), citing Grable v. Secretary of HEW, 442 F.Supp. 465 (W.D.N.Y.1977).
green
Steffanick v. Heckler (1983)
See, e.g., Brandon v. Gardner, 377 F.2d 488, 490 (4th Cir.1967); Bryant v. Harris, 494 F.Supp. 932, 935 (D.S.
green
Wood v. Schweiker (1982)
As stated in Bryant v. Harris, 494 F.Supp. 932, 933 (D.S.C.1980): Reversal of the Secretary's decision is appropriate where the plaintiff's entitlement is clear from the record and where a remand would simply delay receipt of deserved benefits.
green
Wander v. Schweiker (1981)
See, e. g., Marsh v. Harris, 632 F.2d 296, 299 (4th Cir. 1980); Bryant v. Harris, 494 F.Supp. 932, 935 (D.S.C.1980).