Cluster 218623
green
· 210 citation events
across 15 courts.
Showing the 50 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green
In Re: Zohar III, Corp. (2021)
Co. of North America, 642 F.3d 407, 413 (3d Cir. 2011) (“We also review the legal interpretation of contractual language de novo.”); Heasley v. Belden & Blake Corp., 2 F.3d 1249, 1254 (3d Cir. 1993).
“We also review the legal interpretation of contractual language de novo.”
green
Simon Campbell v. Pennsylvania School Boards (2020)
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 413 (3d Cir. 2011) (“We review a district court's grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard the district court applied.”). 95 A fact that PSBA tacitly acknowledged by pleading “actual malice” in both its initial and amended complaints in the State Suit.
“We review a district court's grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard the district court applied.”
green
In re: Zohar III, Corp. (2020)
Co. of North America, 642 F.3d 407, 413 (3d Cir. 2011) (“We also 7 MBIA filed a joinder to the Debtors’ answering brief.
“We also 7 MBIA filed a joinder to the Debtors’ answering brief. (D.I. 42). review the legal interpretation of contractual language de novo.”
green
In re: The Weinstein Company Holdings LLC (2020)
Co. of North America, 642 F.3d 407, 413 (3d Cir. 2011) (“We also review the legal interpretation of contractual language de novo.”); Heasley v. Belden & Blake Corp., 2 F.3d 1249, 1254 (3d Cir. 1993).
“We also review the legal interpretation of contractual language de novo.”
green
First Liberty Ins. Corp. v. McGeehan (2019)
Co., 495 Pa. 348 , 433 A.2d 1342 , 1347 (1981) (citation omitted); see also Viera, 642 F.3d at 419 ("[T]he last-antecedent rule is not an absolute and can assuredly be overcome by other indicia of meaning.").
"[T]he last-antecedent rule is not an absolute and can assuredly be overcome by other indicia of meaning."
green
Beth Cosey v. The Prudential Insurance Company (2013)
Diaz, 424 F.3d at 637, 639 (“[E]very plan requires submission of documentary proof, and the administrator is entitled to insist on [one form of proof over *167 another].” (citations omitted)); see also Viera, 642 F.3d at 417 (“In other words, it is not clear whether ‘satisfactory to Us’ means ‘... proof of loss [in a form] satisfactory to Us’ or ‘... proof of loss [substantively and subjectively] satisfactory to Us.’ ”) (brackets in original); Gross, 734 F.3d at 15 , 2013 WL…
“In other words, it is not clear whether ‘satisfactory to Us’ means ‘... proof of loss [in a form] satisfactory to Us’ or ‘... proof of loss [substantively and subjectively] satisfactory to Us.’ ”
green
Straus v. U.S. Postal Serv. (2017)
Co. of N. Am. , 642 F.3d 407 , 419-20 (3d Cir. 2011) ("Where there is only one reasonable interpretation of a contract, that interpretation controls because straightforward language in [a contract] should be given its natural meaning.") (internal citations omitted).
"Where there is only one reasonable interpretation of a contract, that interpretation controls because straightforward language in [a contract] should be given its natural meaning."
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 413 (3d Cir. 2011).
green
Theresa Gallagher v. Central Valley School District (2026)
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 413 (3d Cir. 2011).
green
Joseph F. Tamburrino, M.D., as an assignee and authorized representative of his patient L.K., and Barbara Wil… (2026)
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 413 (3d Cir. 2011) (citing Metro.
citing Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Glenn, 554 U.S. 105, 111 (2008)
green
Alisha Shephard-Smith v. PMC Property Group, Inc. (2026)
Co. of North America, 642 F.3d 407, 413 (3d Cir. 2011).
green
Pitsko v. Gordon Food Services, Inc. (2025)
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 413 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting Hoover v. Provident Life & Accident Ins.
quoting Hoover v. Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co., 290 F.3d 801, 808-09 (6th Cir. 2002)
green
Klusmann v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1 (2025)
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 418 (3d Cir. 2011)) (“It is appropriate for the Court to consider the applicable standard of review at this juncture because whether discovery is permitted to explore defendants’ alleged bias is irrelevant if the standard of review is de novo.”).
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 413 (3d Cir. 2011).
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 419 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting Barnhart v. Thomas, 540 U.S. 20, 26 (2003)).
quoting Barnhart v. Thomas, 540 U.S. 20, 26 (2003)
green
STALLMAN v. FIRST UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (2024)
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 418 (3d Cir. 2011).
green
Nexstep, Inc. v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC (2024)
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 413 (3d Cir. 2011).
green
TAYLOR v. SHEET METAL WORKERS' NATIONAL PENSION FUND (2024)
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 413 (3d Cir. 2011).
green
HAMMER v. AIG INSURANCE COMPANY (2024)
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 419-20 (3d Cir. 2011)) (citation omitted).
green
NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. WADSWORTH (2024)
Co. of N. Am. , 642 F.3d 407, 419-20 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting Lawson v. Fortis Ins.
quoting Lawson v. Fortis Ins. Co. , 301 F.3d 159, 162 (3d Cir. 2002)
green
Timothy Booth v. Scott Drissel (2024)
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 413 (3d Cir. 2011).
green
Rhonda Hawks v. PNC Financial Services Group Inc (2024)
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 413 (3d Cir. 2011), and we apply the same standard of review that the District Court should have applied.
green
Rhonda Hawks v. PNC Financial Services Group Inc (2024)
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 413 (3d Cir. 2011), and we apply the same standard of review that the District Court should have applied.
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 413 (3d Cir. 2011).
green
ROMBACH v. PLUMBERS LOCAL UNION NO. 27 PENSION FUND (2024)
Co of North America, 642 F. 3d 407, 413 (3d Cir. 2011); Clauss v. Geisinger Health Plan, 196 F. Supp. 3d 463, 469 (M.D.
green
FTX Trading, Ltd. v. (2024)
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 419 (3d Cir. 2011) (citing J.C.
citing J.C. Penney Life Ins. Co. v. Pilosi, 393 F.3d 356, 365 (3d Cir. 2004)
green
Amy Patrick v. Reliance Standard Life Insure (2023)
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 413 (3d Cir. 2011).
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 413-14 (3d Cir. 2011) (“[I]f we exercise de novo review, the role of the court ‘is to determine whether the administrator ... made a correct decision.’ ...
green
STEIN v. PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (2023)
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 413 (3d Cir. 2011) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
internal quotation marks and citation omitted
Co. of North America, 642 F.3d 407, 419 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting 12th Street Gym, Inc., Robert Guzzardi v. General Star Indem.
quoting 12th Street Gym, Inc., Robert Guzzardi v. General Star Indem. Co., 93 F.3d 1158, 1165 (3d Cir. 1996)
green
Colmer v. Administrative Concepts, Inc. (2022)
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 414 (3d Cir. 2011).
Co. of North America, 642 F.3d 407, 413 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting Luby v. Teamsters Health, Welfare, & Pension Trust Funds, 944 F.2d 1176, 1180 (3d Cir. 1991)).
quoting Luby v. Teamsters Health, Welfare, & Pension Trust Funds, 944 F.2d 1176, 1180 (3d Cir. 1991)
green
MONTGOMERY v. TRAVELERS PERSONAL INSURANCE COMPANY (2022)
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 419 (3d Cir. 2011)). 74 Lomma, 788 F. App’x at 107 (quoting Madison Constr.
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 419 (3d Cir. 2011)).
green
Leo Noga v. Fulton Financial Corp Employee (2021)
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 413 (3d Cir. 2011), we will affirm.
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 419 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting Lawson, 301 F.3d at 163 ).
quoting Lawson, 301 F.3d at 163
green
LEVINE v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY (2021)
Co. of North America, 642 F.3d 407, 419-20 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting Lawson v. Fortis Inc. Co., 301 F.3d 159, 162 (3d Cir. 2002)).
quoting Lawson v. Fortis Inc. Co., 301 F.3d 159, 162 (3d Cir. 2002)
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 419 (3d Cir. 2011)). 61 McGeehan, 809 F. App’x at 78 (quoting Lawson v. Fortis Ins.
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 413 (3d Cir. 2011).
green
DWYER v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA (2021)
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 413-14 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting Hoover v. Provident Life and Accident Ins.
quoting Hoover v. Provident Life and Accident Ins. Co., 290 F.3d 801, 809 (6th Cir. 2002)
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 413 (3d Cir. 2011) (citing Luby v. Teamsters Health, Welfare, & Pension Trust Funds, 944 F.2d 1176, 1180 (3d Cir. 1991)).
citing Luby v. Teamsters Health, Welfare, & Pension Trust Funds, 944 F.2d 1176, 1180 (3d Cir. 1991)
green
McWilliams v. Geisinger Health Plan (2021)
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 413 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting Hoover v. Provident Life & Accident Ins.
quoting Hoover v. Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co., 290 F.3d 801, 808-09 (6th Cir. 2002)
green
<font color=\red\">DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE</font> - TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN - NEW CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-cv-032… (2021)
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 413 (3d Cir. 2011) (“if we exercise de novo review, the rofe of the court is to determine whether the administrator .. . made a correct decision.” (alteration in original))).
“if we exercise de novo review, the rofe of the court is to determine whether the administrator .. . made a correct decision.” (alteration in original)
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 413 (3d Cir. 2011) (stating that “the role of the court is to determine whether the administrator . . . made a correct decision”); C.E. v. Excellus Blue Cross Blue Shield, No. 14-6950, 2017 WL 593492 , at *14 (D.N.J.
stating that “the role of the court is to determine whether the administrator . . . made a correct decision”
green
DWYER v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA (2020)
In Viera v. Life Insurance Co. of North America, 642 F.3d 407 (3d Cir. 2011), one of its leading cases on applying the appropriate standard of review in disability cases governed by ERISA, the Court of Appeals stated that in a posture of de novo review, a district court’s “determination may be based on any information before the administrator initially, as well as any supplemental evidence.” Id. at 418 (cleaned up).
cleaned up
green
FORMAN v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA (2020)
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 414 (3d Cir. 2011).
green
PESACOV v. UNUM (2020)
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 413-14 (3d Cir. 2011) (internal quotations, citations and alterations omitted).
internal quotations, citations and alterations omitted
green
First Liberty Insurance v. Paul McGeehan (2020)
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 418 (3d Cir. 2011).
Co. of N. Am., 642 F.3d 407, 414 (3d Cir. 2011) (footnote omitted).
footnote omitted
green
In Re: The Weinstein Company Holdings LLC (2020)
Co. of North America, 642 F.3d 407, 413 (3d Cir. 2011); Heasley v. Belden & Blake Corp., 2 F.3d 1249, 1254 (3d Cir. 1993).