How cited: Galvan v. Northwestern Memorial Hospital · Go Syfert

Galvan v. Northwestern Memorial Hospital (2008)

green · 48 citation events across 11 courts. Showing the 21 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200820172026
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill. · 2 citations in this opinion
Mem’l Hosp., 382 Ill.
citation omitted
green Beeney v. FCA US, LLC (2023)
Rule Authority · D. Del.
Mem’l Hosp., 888 N.E.2d 529, 541 (Ill.
granting motion to dismiss under Illinois law for failure to sufficiently plead causation or injury
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
This was precisely our holding in Galvan v. Northwestern Memorial Hospital, 382 Ill.
green Smith v. NVR, Inc. (2018)
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Hosp., 888 N.E.2d 529, 539 (Ill.
holding that, in addition to “fraudulent misrepresentation,” “[a]n omission or concealment of a material fact in the conduct of trade or commerce constitutes consumer fraud”
Rule Authority · Tenn. Ct. App.
Howell v. Hamilton Meats & Provisions, Inc., 129 Cal.Rptr.3d 325 , 257 P.3d at 1144 (noting that ―[i]nsurers and medical providers negotiate rates in pursuit of their own business interests‖); see also Palmyra Park Hosp., Inc. v. Phoebe Putney Mem’l Hosp., 604 F.3d 1291, 1295 (11th Cir. 2010) (noting that hospitals enter into contracts with private insurers expecting an increase in the number of the insurer‘s policy holders as patients); Galvan v. Northwestern Mem’l Hosp., 3…
noting that a hospital‘s contract with an insurer benefits the hospital because payment is guaranteed
Rule Authority · Tenn.
Howell v. Hamilton Meats & Provisions, Inc., 129 Cal.Rptr.3d 325 , 257 P.3d at 1144 (noting that “[i]nsurers and medical providers negotiate rates in pursuit of their own business interests”); see also Palmyra Park Hosp., Inc. v. Phoebe Putney Mem’l Hosp., 604 F.3d 1291, 1295 (11th Cir.2010) (noting that hospitals enter into contracts with private insurers expecting an increase in the number of the insurer’s policy holders as patients); Galvan v. Northwestern Mem’l Hosp., 38…
noting that a hospital’s contract with an insurer benefits the' hospital because payment is guaranteed
green Jayko v. Fraczek (2012)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 259, 272 , 888 N.E.2d 529, 541 (2008); In re Estate of Cooper, 125 Ill. 2d 363, 369 , 532 N.E.2d 236, 238 (1988) (a lien upon an accident victim’s recovery is a property interest which secures payment of a debt).
green Jayko v. Fraczek (2012)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App.3d 259, 272 , 321 Ill.Dec. 10 , 888 N.E.2d 529, 541 (2008); In re Estate of Cooper, 125 Ill.2d 363, 369 , 126 Ill.Dec. 551 , 532 N.E.2d 236, 238 (1988) (a lien upon an accident victim's recovery is a property interest which secures payment of a debt).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Hosp., 382 Ill.App.3d 259 , 321 Ill.Dec. 10 , 888 N.E.2d 529, 541 (2008) (holding that plaintiff adequately pleaded concealment of information about rates and billing practices, but did not adequately plead damages); see also Pappas v. Pella Corp., 363 Ill.App.3d 795 , 300 Ill.Dec. 552 , 844 N.E.2d 995, 1001 (2006) (‘While a plaintiff bringing a product liability claim must allege that a defect renders a product ‘unreasonably dangerous,’ neither ‘defect’ nor ‘unreasonably da…
holding that plaintiff adequately pleaded concealment of information about rates and billing practices, but did not adequately plead damages
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
Dec. 10 , 888 N.E.2d 529, 539 (Ill.App.Ct. 2008) (internal quotations omitted); see also Durell v. Sharp Healthcare, 183 Cal. App.4th 1350 , 108 Cal.Rptr.3d 682, 697 (Cal.Ct.App.2010).
internal quotations omitted
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Galvan v. Northwestern Memorial Hospital, 382 Ill.
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
Galvan v. Northwestern Memorial Hospital, 382 Ill.
Rule Authority · S.D. Ill.
In general, a trade practice satisfies the second prong of the test of unfairness under the ICFA when it “leave[s] the consumer with little alternative except to submit to it[J” Galvan v. Northwestern Mem’l Hosp., 382 Ill.App.3d 259 , 321 Ill.Dec. 10 , 888 N.E.2d 529, 536 (2008) (quoting Robinson, 266 Ill.Dec. 879 , 775 N.E.2d at 961 ).
quoting Robinson, 266 Ill.Dec. 879 , 775 N.E.2d at 961
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
See Pappas, 363 Ill.App.3d at 805 , 300 Ill.Dec. 552 , 844 N.E.2d 995 (distinguishing Avery, Shannon, Oliveira, and Zekman and holding that a plaintiff is not required to allege actual deception to state ICFA claim based on omission of material fact); Galvan v. Northwestern Memorial Hosp., 382 Ill.App.3d 259 , 321 Ill.Dec. 10 , 888 N.E.2d 529, 540 (1st Dist.2008) (“in a case where the plaintiff alleges consumer fraud based on concealment of facts, a plaintiff need only alleg…
green Roberts v. Adkins (2010)
Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.
App. 3d 259, 263-64 , 888 N.E.2d 529, 535 (2008).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Mem'l Hosp., 382 Ill.App.3d 259 , 321 Ill.Dec. 10 , 888 N.E.2d 529, 540 (1st Dist. 2008); see Pappas v. Pella Corp., 363 Ill.
Rule Authority · Bankr. N.D. Ill.
Mem’l Hosp., — Ill.App.3d —, 321 Ill.Dec. 10 , 888 N.E.2d 529, 535 (2008).
Cited (see also) · 7th Cir. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
Id. (no claim stated for omission of material fact in violation of ICFA because plaintiff did not allege it would not have purchased insurance had it known about contingent commissions received by defendant); see also Galvan v. Northwestern Memorial Hosp., 382 Ill.App.3d 259 , 321 Ill.Dec. 10 , 888 N.E.2d 529, 541 (2008). 2.
green Sauro v. Leman (2024)
Cited (see also) · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
Oct. 1, 2020) (stating points not argued in an appellant’s brief “are forfeited and shall not be raised in the reply brief, in oral argument, or on petition for rehearing”); see also Galvan v. Northwestern Memorial Hospital, 382 Ill.
finding no need to address the plaintiff’s contention that they should have been granted leave to amend their complaint where it was raised for the first time on appeal in the plaintiff’s reply brief
Cited (see also) · N.D. Ill. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
Instead, the “defendant’s conduct must violate public policy, be so oppressive as to leave the consumer with little alternative except to submit to it, and injure the consumer.” Id.; see also Galvan, 382 Ill.App.3d at 265 , 321 Ill.Dec. 10 , 888 N.E.2d 529 .
Cited · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see
See Galvan v. Northwestern Memorial Hospital, 382 Ill.