Cluster 2247355

green · 77 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 12 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 12

green Wedeking v. Illinois Central Railroad Co. (2023)

Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.

Clemons v. Mechanical Devices Co., 292 Ill.

green Jacobs v. Yellow Cab Affiliation, Inc. (2017)

Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · 2 citations in this opinion

App. 3d 242, 251 , 684 N.E.2d 1344, 1350 (1997).

green Whelan Law v. Kruppe (2011)

Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.

App. 3d 251, 255 (2008); Clemons v. Mechanical Devices Co., 292 Ill.

Cook, J., dissenting

green Timothy Whelan Law Associates, Ltd. v. Kruppe (2011)

Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.

App. 3d 251, 255 (2008); Clemons v. Mechanical Devices Co., 292 Ill.

Cook, J., dissenting

green Vancura v. Katris (2009)

Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: cf.

Cf. Clemons v. Mechanical Devices, Co., 292 Ill.App.3d 242, 252-53 , 226 Ill.Dec. 141 , 684 N.E.2d 1344, 1350-51 (1997) (finding that admission of expert testimony, attorney's remarks, and judge's instruction about statute may well have confused the jury about the basis for liability, and deprived the defendant of a fair trial).

finding that admission of expert testimony, attorney's remarks, and judge's instruction about statute may well have confused the jury about the basis for liability, and deprived the defendant of a fair trial

green Vancura v. Katris (2008)

Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.

App. 3d 242, 252-53 , 684 N.E.2d 1344, 1350-51 (1997) (finding that admission of expert testimony, attorney’s remarks, and judge’s instruction about statute may well have confused the jury about the basis for liability and deprived the defendant of a fair trial).

finding that admission of expert testimony, attorney’s remarks, and judge’s instruction about statute may well have confused the jury about the basis for liability and deprived the defendant of a fair trial

green Clemons v. Mechanical Devices Co. (2002)

Rule Authority · Ill.

Clemons v. Mechanical Devices Co. , 292 Ill.

green Clemons v. Mechanical Devices Co. (2002)

Rule Authority · Ill.

Clemons v. Mechanical Devices Co., 292 Ill.

green Maffett v. Bliss (2002)

Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.

App. 3d 242, 251 , 684 N.E.2d 1344, 1350 (1997), aff'd , 184 Ill. 2d 328 , 704 N.E.2d 403 (1998); M.

hereinafter Handbook of Illinois Evidence

green Maffett v. Bliss (2002)

Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · 2 citations in this opinion

Clemons v. Mechanical Devices Co., 292 Ill.App.3d 242, 251 , 226 Ill.Dec. 141 , 684 N.E.2d 1344, 1350 (1997), aff'd, 184 Ill.2d 328 , 235 Ill.Dec. 54 , 704 N.E.2d 403 (1998); M.

green First Midwest Trust v. Rogers (1998)

Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.

App. 3d 242, 247-51 , 684 N.E.2d 1344, 1347-50 (1997); Handbook of Evidence §402.1, at 178.

green First Midwest Trust Co. v. Rogers (1998)

Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.

App. 3d 242, 247-51 , 684 N.E.2d 1344, 1347-50 (1997); Handbook of Evidence § 402.1, at 178.