Cluster 2291663

Hinners v. Robey, 336 S.W.3d 891, 895 (Ky. 2011) (internal quotation marks, citations, and footnote omitted).

Hinners v. Robey, 336 S.W.3d 891, 895 (Ky. 2011).

However, the Supreme Court of Kentucky has explained that “[a] plain reading of the statutory language produces the interpretation that the contract need not be made or executed ‘in this Commonwealth,’ but, rather, only that the contract provide for the supplying of services or goods to be transported into, consumed or used in Kentucky.” Hinners v. Robey, 336 S.W.3d 891, 896 (Ky. 2011); see also Estate of Gibson v. Daimler North America Corp., 638 F. Supp. 3d 735 , 745 (E.D.

ANALYSIS “When a lawsuit is filed in Kentucky against a non-resident defendant, the plaintiff carries the burden of establishing jurisdiction over the defendant.” Hinners v. Robey, 336 S.W.3d 891, 895 (Ky. 2011).

Hinners v. Robey, 336 S.W.3d 891, 895 (Ky. 2011). -5- ANALYSIS The first issue we will address on appeal is whether the trial court had personal jurisdiction over Stone.

In other words, a plaintiff’s Complaint must establish “with reasonable particularity sufficient contacts between [defendant] and the forum state to support jurisdiction.” Hinners v. Robey, 336 S.W.3d 891, 895 (Ky. 2011).

Contracting to Supply Services in Kentucky Reid next argues that personal jurisdiction is proper pursuant to KRS 454.210(2)(a)(2): “Contracting to supply services or goods in this Commonwealth.” “The crux of this statutory provision is not where the alleged contract was executed, but whether the contract provided for ‘services or goods to be transported into, consumed or used in Kentucky.’” H.E.B., LLC v. Jackson Walker, L.L.P., 587 S.W.3d 333 , 342 (Ky. Ct. App. 2019) (quot…

Hinners v. Robey, 336 S.W.3d 891, 895 (Ky. 2011) (citing Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Inc. v. Coleman, 239 S.W.3d 49, 53-54 (Ky. 2007)).

H.E.B., LLC v. Jackson Walker, L.L.P., 587 S.W.3d 333 , 342 (Ky. Ct. App. 2019) (citing Hinners v. Robey, 336 S.W.3d 891, 896 (Ky. 2011)).

While the Chavdas’ complaint seeks the return of the partnership and personal documents, the Chavdas’ remedy, if they prevail on their fraud claim, would be limited to those damages caused by Solanki’s misrepresentation. -8- “[D]ue process requires . . . that in order to subject a defendant to a judgment in personam, if he be not present within the territory of the forum, he have certain minimum contacts with it such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend ‘traditio…

In order for personal jurisdiction to attach when a defendant provides a service, a contract must “provide for the supplying of services . . . to be transported into, consumed, or used in Kentucky.” Hinners v. Robey, 336 S.W.3d 891, 896 (Ky. 2011).

Hinners v. Robey, 336 S.W.3d 891, 895 (Ky. 2011); see KRS § 454.210(2)(a). 1.

Ky. Sept. 26, 2018) (quoting Hinners v. Robey, 336 S.W.3d 891, 896 (Ky. 2011)).

Hinners v. Robey, 336 S.W.3d 891, 896 (Ky. 2011).

Hinners v. Robey, 336 S.W.3d 891, 896 (Ky. 2011).

Hinners v. Robey, 336 S.W.3d 891, 896 (Ky. 2011).

The Court stated that “[a] plain reading of the statutory language produces the interpretation that the contract need not be made or executed ‘in this Commonwealth,’ but, rather, only that the contract provide for the supplying of services or goods to be transported into, consumed or used in Kentucky.” 336 S.W.3d 891, 896 (Ky.2011).

See Hinners, 336 S.W.3d at 895 n.6.

See Hinners v. Robey, 336 S.W.3d 891, 895 (Ky. 2011) (citing Caesar’s Riverboat Casino, LLC v. Beach, 336 S.W.3d 51 (Ky. 2011)).

See, e.g., Hinners v. Robey, 336 S.W.3d 891, 895 (Ky. 2011) (noting that on a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, the plaintiff “‘need only make a prima facie showing of jurisdiction’”) (quoting CompuServe, Inc. v. Patterson, 89 F.3d 1257, 1262 (6th Cir. 1996)); Brown v. Griffin, 505 S.W.3d 777, 783 (Ky. App. 2016) (upholding a grant of summary judgment because “Brown failed to establish a prima facie case of medical negligence – duty, breach and consequent injury”).

See, e.g., Hinners v. Robey, 336 S.W.3d 891, 895 (Ky. 2011) (noting that on a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, the plaintiff “‘need only make a prima facie showing of jurisdiction’”) (quoting CompuServe, Inc. v. Patterson, 89 F.3d 1257, 1262 (6th Cir. 1996)); Brown v. Griffin, 505 S.W.3d 777, 783 (Ky. App. 2016) (upholding a grant of summary judgment because “Brown failed to establish a prima facie case of medical negligence – duty, breach and consequent injury”).

See also Hinners v. Robey, 336 S.W.3d 891 (Ky.2011).