Cluster 2300594

green · 39 citation events across 9 courts. Showing the 14 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 14

green United States Ex Rel. PCC Construction, Inc. v. Star Insurance (2000)

Rule Authority · D.N.J.

Each case ... depends of course for its results on its own facts, and owing to the multifariousness of facts, no case of coadventure rises higher than a persuasive precedent for another.” United States v. Standard Oil Company of California, 155 F.Supp. 121, 148 (S.D.N.Y.1957), aff'd, 270 F.2d 50 (2d Cir.1959).

green US Airways Group, Inc. v. British Airways PLC (1997)

Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.

United States v. Standard Oil Co., 155 F.Supp. 121, 148 (S.D.N.Y.1957), aff'd, 270 F.2d 50 (2d Cir.1959).

green Sound Video Unlimited, Inc. v. Video Shack Inc. (1988)

Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.

A joint venture under New York law “has been variously defined as an association to carry out a single business enterprise for profit; a common enterprise for mutual benefit; [and] a combination of property, efforts, skill and judgment in a common undertaking.” United States v. Standard Oil Co., 155 F.Supp. 121, 148 (S.D.N.Y.1957), aff'd, 270 F.2d 50 (2d Cir.1959).

green McDonald v. Dabbagh (In Re Perret) (1986)

Rule Authority · Bankr. N.D.N.Y.

A joint venture under New York law is defined as “an association to carry out a single business enterprise for profit; a common enterprise for mutual benefit; a combination of property, efforts, skill and judgment in a common undertaking.” U.S. Standard Oil Company of California, 155 F.Supp. 121, 148 (S.D.N.Y.1957), aff'd 270 F.2d 50 (2d Cir.1959).

green Precision Testing Laboratories, Ltd. v. Kenyon Corp. of America (1986)

Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.

McGhan v. Ebersol, 608 F.Supp. 277, 282 (S.D.N.Y.1985); see Sherrier v. Richard, 564 F.Supp. 448, 457 (S.D.N.Y.1983); Yonofsky v. Wernick, 362 F.Supp. 1005, 1030-31 (S.E.N.Y.1973) (citing U.S. v. Standard Oil, 155 F.Supp. 121, 148 (S.D.N.Y.1957), aff'd, 270 F.2d 50 (2d Cir.1959), in 2 S. Williston, Contracts § 318A at 579 (1959)); Ramirez v. Goldberg, 82 A.D.2d 850, 852 , 439 N.Y.S.2d 959, 961 (2d Dep’t 1981).

green Halloran v. Ohlmeyer Communications Co. (1985)

Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.

Existence of a Joint Venture Under New York law, a joint venture “has been variously defined as an association to carry out a single business enterprise for profit; a common enterprise for mutual benefit; [and] a combination of property, efforts, skill and judgment in a common undertaking.” United States v. Standard Oil Co., 155 F.Supp. 121, 148 (S.D.N.Y.1957), aff'd, 270 F.2d 50 (2d Cir.1959).

green McGhan v. Ebersol (1985)

Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.

Joint Venture Under New York law, a “joint venture” is defined as “an association to carry out a single business enterprise for profit; a common enterprise for mutual benefit; a combination of property, efforts, skill and judgment in a common undertaking.” U.S. v. Standard Oil Co., 155 F.Supp. 121, 148 (S.D.N.Y.1957), aff'd, 270 F.2d 50 (2d Cir.1959); see Chalmers v. Eaton Corp., 71 A.D.2d 721 , 419 N.Y.S.2d 217 (3d Dept.1979).

green Dobbs v. Vornado, Inc. (1983)

Rule Authority · E.D.N.Y

See, e.g., Fitch v. King, 279 Ill. 62, 65 , 116 N.E. 624, 625 (1917); United States v. Standard Oil of California, 155 F.Supp. 121, 148 (S.D.N.Y.1957), aff’d 270 F.2d 50 (2d Cir. 1959).

green Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc. v. George P. Mitchell, George P. Mitchell v. Colonial Refrigerated… (1968)

Rule Authority · 5th Cir.

Cf. La Varre v. Hall, 5 Cir., 1930, 42 F.2d 65 ; United States v. Standard Oil Co. of California, S.D.N.Y.1957, 155 F.Supp. 121, 148 (and cases cited therein) and Morrison v. Caspersen, 1959, Mo.Sup.

green Sadwith v. Lantry (1963)

Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.

“A joint venture or enterprise is, in essence, an informal partnership between two or more persons for a limited undertaking or purpose.” Backus Plywood Corp. v. Commercial Decal, Inc., 208 F.Supp. 687, 690 (S.D.N.Y.1962), aff’d 317 F.2d 339 , 2d Cir., 1963; United States v. Standard Oil Corp., 155 F.Supp. 121, 148 (S.D.N.

green National State Bank of Newark v. Terminal Const. Corp. (1963)

Rule Authority · D.N.J.

The cases are of little help since they are generally restricted to their own peculiar facts. ‘Each case in which a coadventure is claimed * * * [sic] depends of course for its results on its own facts, and owing to the multifariousness of facts, no case of coadventure rises higher than a persuasive precedent for another.’ ” United States v. Standard Oil Co. of California, 155 F.Supp. 121, 148 (S.D.N.Y.1957), aff’d 270 F.2d 50 (2d Cir., 1959).

green Backus Plywood Corporation v. Commercial Decal, Inc. (1962)

Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y. · 2 citations in this opinion

S.D.Fla.1932, 57 F.2d 313 ; United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. for Use of Reedy v. American Surety Co., D.C.M.D.Penn.1938, 25 F.Supp. 280 .” United States v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal., 155 F.Supp. 121, 148 (S.D.N.Y. 1957), aff’d, 270 F.2d 50 (2d Cir. 1959); see Wagner v. Derecktor, 306 N.Y. 386, 390 , 118 N.E.2d 570, 572 (1954) ; 2 Williston, Contracts § 318A (3d ed. 1959); Nichols, Joint Ventures, 36 Va.L.Rev. 425 (1950); Taubman, What Constitutes a Joint Venture, 41 Corn…

green Morrison v. Caspersen (1959)

Rule Authority · Mo.

Shafer v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., Mo., 295 S.W.2d 109, 116 [13-15]; Gales v. Weldon, Mo, 282 S.W.2d 522, 527 [3]; Fuller v. Laws, 219 Mo.App, 342, 271 S.W. 836, 840 ; United States v. Standard Oil Co. of California, D.C.S.D.N.Y, 155 F.Supp. 121, 148 [6-8] [9]; Spencer Kellogg & Sons, Inc. v. Lobban, Tenn.Sup., 315 S.W.2d 514, 520 [15], As an apparent exception to the usual rule, see Brooks v. Brooks, 357 Mo. 343 , 208 S.W. 2d 279 , 4 A.L.R.2d 826 .

green Flammia v. Mite Corporation (1975)

Cited · E.D.N.Y · signal: see

See United States v. Standard Oil, 155 F.Supp. 121, 148 (S.D.N.Y.1957), aff’d, 270 F.2d 50 (2nd Cir. 1959).