Cluster 2376067
green
· 84 citation events
across 9 courts.
Showing the 50 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green
Thompson v. Fluent, Inc. (2020)
Chapter of Trout Unltd., Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 306 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) ("By conserving judicial resources, a stay will serve not only the interest of the courts, but also the interests of the Parties, the nonparties, and the public in 'an orderly and efficient use of judicial resources.'").
"By conserving judicial resources, a stay will serve not only the interest of the courts, but also the interests of the Parties, the nonparties, and the public in 'an orderly and efficient use of judicial resources.'"
green
Mansfield Heliflight, Inc. v. Nicholas R. Longo, in his official capacity as Director of Aviation for the Cit… (2025)
Id. at 508 (quoting Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)).
green
Kumaran v. ADM Investor Services, Inc. (2025)
The “basic goal” remains to “avoid prejudice.” Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009).
green
Acosta v. The New York Times Company (2025)
Apr. 9, 2014) (granting stay of action pending outcome of complaint with EEOC where it “is almost certain that [Defendants] would face an identical lawsuit absent a stay.”); Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 306 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (“By conserving judicial resources, a stay will serve not only the interest of the courts, but also the interests of the Parties, the nonparties, and the public in an orderly and efficient use of …
green
TGISE Capital LLC v. Lefkaditis (2025)
Having considered the relevant factors in deciding whether to stay discovery pending the the outcome of the settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Wang, see Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. E.P.A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009), the Court finds that a stay of discovery, with the exception of "limited discovery to aid settlement negotiations," is warranted here.
green
X-Caliber Funding LLC v. Petersen (2025)
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009).
green
Mayors v. Port Impoerial Ferry Corp. (2025)
The decision whether to grant a stay is “firmly within a district court's discretion,” Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009).
Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936)), and the decision whether to grant a stay is placed “firmly within a district court’s discretion,” Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009).
“The decision whether to issue a stay is therefore firmly within a district court’s discretion.” Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009).
green
Addison Central School District v. Monsanto Co. (2024)
Id. at 508 (quoting Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)).
green
Short v. City of Rochester (2024)
CONCLUSION “By conserving judicial resources, a stay will serve not only the interest[s] of the [Court], but also the interests of the [p]arties, the non- parties, and the public in ‘an orderly and efficient use of judicial re- sources.’” Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 306 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (alterations added and quotation omitted).
alterations added and quotation omitted
green
Nino v. CNBC LLC (2024)
Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. United States EPA, 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 297 (S.D.N.Y. 2009).
green
Lazaar v. The Anthem Companies, Inc. (2024)
Protection Agency, 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009))).
green
Lamb v. Forbes Media LLC (2024)
Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. United States EPA, 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 297 (S.D.N.Y. 2009).
Conn. 2020) (citing Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)).
green
Ruff v. Montreign Operating Company, LLC (2024)
Protection Agency, 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)).
A stay of this action would “best serve the interests of the courts by promoting judicial efficiency.” Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (internal quotation marks omitted).
internal quotation marks omitted
green
Sullivan v. Gelb (2023)
Mar. 15, 2018) (citing Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)).
A stay will “best serve the interests of the courts by promoting judicial efficiency” and will “minimize[e] the possibility of conflicts between different courts.” Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (quoting N.Y.
quoting N.Y. Power Auth. v. United States, 42 Fed. Cl. 795, 799 (Fed. Cl. 1999)
green
Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. ASMedia Technology, Inc. (2023)
Agency, 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (collecting cases); WHEREAS the “general rule” is that, “absent special circumstances,” a lawsuit filed first takes priority over a subsequently filed lawsuit, Kahn v. Gen.
collecting cases
green
Bulgari v. Bulgari (2023)
Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. United States EPA, 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (internal quotation marks omitted).
internal quotation marks omitted
green
Nelson v. Gskill USA, Inc. (2023)
In analyzing this factor, courts have considered whether staying an action will “serve the interest of the courts by promoting judicial efficiency and ‘minimizing the possibility of conflicts between different courts.’” Readick, 2014 WL 1683799 , at *5 (quoting Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)).
Protection Agency, 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (collecting cases) (citing LaSala v. Needham & Co., 399 F. Supp. 2d 421, 427 (S.D.N.Y. 2005).
collecting cases
green
Chechele v. Standard General Master Fund L.P. (2023)
Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. United States EPA, 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (quoting LaSala v. Needham & Co., Inc., 399 F. Supp. 2d 421, 427 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)).
quoting LaSala v. Needham & Co., Inc., 399 F. Supp. 2d 421, 427 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)
Protection Agency, 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (collecting cases) (citing LaSala v. Needham & Co., 399 F. Supp. 2d 421, 427 (S.D.N.Y. 2005).
collecting cases
green
Ball v. Baker (2022)
Considering the significant overlap between this action and the DOJ action, a stay here “best serve[s] the interests of the courts by promoting judicial efficiency and minimizing the possibility of conflicts between different courts.” Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (citation and internal quotations omitted).
citation and internal quotations omitted
green
Cardwell v. Empress Ambulance Service, LLC (2022)
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009).
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009).
green
Castaldo v. Empress Ambulance Services, LLC (2022)
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009).
green
Finn v. Empress Ambulance Services, Inc. (2022)
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009).
green
Hitach Capital America Corp. v. eCapital Corp. (2022)
Finally, the Court is inclined to stay this case pending the resolution of the Florida Case because such a stay will promote judicial efficiency and “minimiz[e] the possibility of conflicts between different courts.” Catskill Mountains Chapter Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. EPA, 630 F.Supp.2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green
CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd v. Air India, Ltd. (2022)
Given that resolution of the Republic of India’s motions to dismiss in the D.C. actions may narrow or clarify FSIA issues in the instant actions, staying the instant actions until those motions have been decided will serve the “interests of the courts by promoting judicial efficiency and minimizing the possibility of conflicts between different courts.” Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (quotation mar…
quotation marks, citations, and alteration omitted
green
Whyble v. The Nature's Bounty Co. (2022)
Compl. ¶¶ 170, 181, 195, 206, 220–21, 230, 245, 261–62 (asserting similar claims under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act, New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, New York General Business Law, North Carolina’s Consumer Protection Statute, Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, and Washington Consumer Protection Act).) As such, a stay here “best serve[s] the interests …
citation omitted
Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936). “[T]he decision whether to issue a stay is, therefore, firmly within a district court’s discretion.” Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. U.S. E.P_A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N_Y. 2009) (quotation marks, citations, and alterations omitted).
quotation marks, citations, and alterations omitted
green
DAIJ, Inc. v. Wesco Insurance Company (2021)
May 11, 2020); Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 307 (S.D.N.Y. 2009); Bureau of Consumer Fin.
SA/NV v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 356 F. Supp. 3d 287, 299 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (“Stays are also appropriate ‘while awaiting the outcome of proceedings which bear upon the case, even if such proceedings are not necessarily controlling of the action that is to be stayed.’ (quoting Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. EPA, 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 305 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)); see also Ritchie Capital Mgmt., L.L.C. v. Jeffries, 849 F. Supp. 2d 881, 889-90 (D.
green
Walker v. Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority (2021)
Vapi i BJU gc L iN CVV □□□□□□□ 27, 2021 Page 2 REGAL & KENNEY» Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009).
green
Davis v. New York City Housing Authority (2020)
A court’s power to stay proceedings derives from its power “to control the disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants.” Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. EPA, 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (quoting Landis v. N. Am.
quoting Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936)
green
Liguori, Jr. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (2020)
Indeed, a stay would minimize the possibility of conflicting and inconsistent orders between different courts with respect to litigation that is substantively similar, Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. E.P.A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2004), and support the dual interests of judicial economy and efficiency.
green
Under Cover Roofing Labor, Inc. v. Herrick (2020)
Id. at 508 (quoting Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)).
green
Key v. Cuomo (2020)
Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936). “[T]he decision whether to issue a stay is, therefore, firmly within a district court’s discretion.” Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (internal quotation marks, citations, and alterations omitted).
internal quotation marks, citations, and alterations omitted
green
Tyus v. Semple (2020)
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. United States E.P.A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (citations omitted).
citations omitted
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. E.P.A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (quoting Finn v. Barney, No. 08 Civ. 2975 (LTS) (KNF), 2008 WL 5215699 , at *2 (S.D.N.Y.
quoting Finn v. Barney, No. 08 Civ. 2975 (LTS) (KNF), 2008 WL 5215699 , at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2008)
green
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Laver (2019)
Staying this action “will best serve the interests of the courts by promoting judicial efficiency and minimizing the possibility of conflicts between different courts.” Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (internal quotation marks, alteration, and citation omitted).
internal quotation marks, alteration, and citation omitted
green
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2014)
“On July 22, 2008, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2112 (a)(3), the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ... consolidated the five petitions for review of the Water Transfers Rule then pending in the First, Second, and Eleventh Circuit Courts of Appeal and randomly assigned them to the Eleventh Circuit.” Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., 630 F.Supp.2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y.2009).
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. EPA, 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 308 (S.D.N.Y. 2009). 8 In 2009, we reviewed the injunction issued by the district court in the light of the Administrator’s new water-transfer rule.
green
States of New York, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois v. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2012)
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. EPA, 630 F.Supp.2d 295, 308 (S.D.N.Y.2009).
green
Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. LY USA, Inc. (2012)
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. EPA, 630 F.Supp.2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y.2009)(listing five-factor test and collecting cases); see also Golden Quality Ice Cream Co., Inc. v. Deerfield Specialty Papers, Inc., 87 F.R.D. 53, 56-58 (E.D.Pa.1980) (Poliak, /.) (originally setting out this test). 14 .
See Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. United State E.P.A, 630 F.Supp.2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009).
See Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., 630 F. Supp. 2d 295, 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2009).