How cited: Cluster 2379260 · Go Syfert

Cluster 2379260

green · 12 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 5 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · D.C. Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
It is true that we, like other circuits, have extended Feres to bar claims brought “under both 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (3) for deprivation of ... civil rights and under common-law tort theories.” Bois v. Marsh, 801 F.2d at 468; see supra note 4; see also, e.g., Mackey v. United States, 226 F.3d 773, 776 (6th Cir.2000) (joining D.C., Second, Third, Fourth, Seventh, Eighth and Ninth Circuits in “holding] that the Feres doctrine applies to intentional torts”); Alvarez v. Wilson, 600 F…
green Duffy v. United States (1992)
Rule Authority · 7th Cir.
See also Miller v. Newbauer, 862 F.2d 771, 774-75 (9th Cir.1988); Alvarez v. Wilson, 600 F.Supp. 706, 711-12 (N.D.Ill.1985).
green Duffy v. United States (1992)
Rule Authority · 7th Cir.
See also Miller v. Newbauer, 862 F.2d 771, 774-75 (9th Cir.1988); Alvarez v. Wilson, 600 F.Supp. 706, 711-12 (N.D.Ill.1985).
Cited · D.C. Cir. · signal: see
See Alvarez v. Wilson, 600 F.Supp. 706, 710-12 (N.D.Ill.1985). 12 That court found controlling the Supreme Court's analysis in holding that intramilitary damages actions were not available under either the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) or the Constitution.
green Bois v. Marsh (1986)
Cited · D.C. Cir. · signal: see
See Alvarez v. Wilson, 600 F.Supp. 706, 710-12 (N.D.Ill.1985). 12 That court found controlling the Supreme Court’s analysis in holding that intramilitary damages actions were not available under either the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) or the Constitution.