Cluster 2434554
green
· 21 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 6 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green
Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation, Lummi Nation Housing Authority, Fort Berthold Housing Authority, and Ho… (2013)
Fort Peck Housing Auth. v. HUD, 435 F. Supp. 2d 1125, 1132 (D.
“Fort Peck I”
green
Yakama Nation Housing Authority v. United States (2011)
The court agreed, holding that § 1000.318 conflicted with 25 U.S.C. § 4152 (b)(1), which mandated that HUD include “low-income housing dwelling units owned or operated at the time pursuant to a contract between an Indian housing authority for the tribe and the Secretary.” Fort Peck Housing Auth. v. HUD, 435 F.Supp.2d 1125, 1132 (2006) (“Fort Peck I”).
“Fort Peck I”
Fort Peck Housing Auth. v. HUD, 435 F.Supp.2d 1125, 1132 (D.Colo.2006) (“Fort Peck I”). 7 In particular, Fort Peck maintained that the statute required that the allocation formula include housing units owned or operated by the tribe on September 30, 1997, and consequently precluded HUD from excluding such units from the formula.
The OIG audit report concluded that the program’s funds had not been properly allocated in previous years because the grant allocations were based on “housing units that do not qualify as FCAS.” Fort Peck Housing Auth. v. United, States Dep’t of Housing and Urban Dev., 435 F.Supp.2d 1125, 1130 (D.Colo.2006) (Fort Peck I).
Fort Peck Housing Auth. v. United States Dept. of Housing & Urban Dev., 435 F.Supp.2d 1125, 1132 (D.Colo.2006).
green
United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians of Oklahoma v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Developm… (2009)
Auth. v. U.S. Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 435 F.Supp.2d 1125, 1127-29 (D.Colo.2006) for a general description of NAHASDA's funding mechanism.