Cluster 2440773
green
· 13 citation events
across 6 courts.
Showing the 12 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green
In re Ebix, Inc. Securities Litigation (2012)
Garfield, 466 F.3d at 1268-70 ; see also In re Friedman’s, 385 F.Supp.2d at 1361 (“Relevant facts are the magnitude of the accounting error, whether the defendants had prior notice of the error, and whether the defendants played any role in calculating and disseminating the financial statement.”) (internal citations omitted).
“Relevant facts are the magnitude of the accounting error, whether the defendants had prior notice of the error, and whether the defendants played any role in calculating and disseminating the financial statement.”
green
TAILLARD v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC (2025)
Litig., 385 F. Supp. 2d 1345, 1369 (N.D.
noting fact-intensive inquiries are generally not resolved on motions to dismiss and are instead more appropriate for motions for summary judgment
green
Thorpe v. Walter Investment Management, Corp. (2015)
Litig., the court found that scienter was properly pled where the company’s controller was alleged to have personally reviewed reports that disclosed the accounting errors. 385 F.Supp.2d 1345,1363 (N.D.Ga.2005.) And as the Eleventh Circuit noted in Brophy , courts have found particularized allegations exist when a plaintiff alleges that there were “focused inquiries from analysts that correctly suggested why the projections were implausible” or the defendant “personally revi…
green
Christopher Brophy v. Jiangbo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (2015)
Litig., 385 F.Supp.2d 1345, 1363 (N.D.Ga. 2005) (finding scienter properly pled where the company’s controller was alleged to have reviewed incriminating documents personally and made specific choices in pursuit of an illegal scheme).
finding scienter properly pled where the company’s controller was alleged to have reviewed incriminating documents personally and made specific choices in pursuit of an illegal scheme
Litig., 385 F.Supp.2d 1345, 1371 (N.D.Ga.2005). 10 .
green
In re Healthsouth Corp. Securities Litigation (2009)
Litig., 385 F.Supp.2d 1345, 1373 (N.D.Ga.2005) (class plaintiffs who only purchased shares in 2003 stock offering had standing to bring claims against auditor and underwriter defendants for stock offered in both 2002 and 2003); Sanders v. Robinson Humphrey/American Exp., Inc., 634 F.Supp. 1048, 1057 (N.D.Ga.1986), aff'd in part and rev’d in part on other grounds sub nom., Kirkpatrick v. J.C.
Litig., 385 F.Supp.2d 1345, 1361 (N.D.Ga.2005) (alteration and internal quotation marks omitted).
Litig., 385 F.Supp.2d 1345, 1361 (N.D.Ga.2005) (alteration and internal quotation marks omitted).
green
In Re Scottish Re Group Securities Litigation (2007)
Litig., 385 F.Supp.2d 1345, 1361-62 (N.D.Ga.2005). 175 .
green
In Re Spectrum Brands, Inc. Securities Litigation (2006)
Lit., 385 F.Supp.2d 1345, 1363-64 (N.D.Ga.2005).
green
Robert Garfield v. NDCHealth Corporation (2006)
Litig., 385 F.Supp.2d 1345, 1365-66 (N.D.Ga.2005) (finding a strong inference of scienter where auditing firm “had continuous arguments” with company management over allowance for uncollected accounts, the firm “knew that” the company was under-reserved, the firm discussed doubtful accounts every quarter, and the firm committed numerous GAAP and GAAS violations); In re Hamilton Bankcorp., Inc., Sec.
green
Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania v. Peters (2008)
See also In re Friedman’s, Inc. Securities Litig., 385 F.Supp.2d 1345 , 1371 n. 28 (N.D.Ga.2005) (following Krim and noting agreement with another district court that securities need not be purchased directly in the offering itself but may be traced to the violative registration statement). 68 .