How cited: Cluster 2474762 · Go Syfert

Cluster 2474762

green · 24 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 9 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Quote Authority · D. Maryland
Md. 2018) (determining that sovereign immunity had not been waived under the FTCA for a constructive fraud claim); Huff v. U.S. Dep’t of the Army, 508 F. Supp. 2d 459, 465 (D.
“The jurisdictional grant provided by the FTCA…does not extend to claims arising out of misrepresentation or deceit.”
green Lewis v. United States (2022)
Rule Authority · D. Maryland
Dep’t of the Army, 508 F.Supp.2d 459, 465 (D.
green Nieves v. McHugh (2015)
Rule Authority · E.D.N.C. · 2 citations in this opinion
Defendant cites Huff v. United States Department of the Army, 508 F.Supp.2d 459, 464 (D.Md.2007), for the proposition that “judicial review of [a] discharge primarily to fix the Army’s liability for benefits” is “monetary in nature” and falls outside of section 702’s waiver of immunity.
Rule Authority · D. Maryland · 4 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., Dep’t of Army v. Blue Fox, Inc., 525 U.S. 255, 259-63 , 119 S.Ct. 687 , 142 L.Ed.2d 718 (1999); Huff v. Dep’t of Army, 508 F.Supp.2d 459, 462-63 (D.Md.2007).
green Moon v. Gomez (2024)
Cited · D. Maryland · signal: see
See Huff v. U.S. Dept. of Army, 508 F. Supp. 2d 459, 465 (D.
green Tomlinson v. Horoho (2023)
Cited · D. Maryland · signal: see
See Huff U.S. Dep’t of Army, 508 F. Supp. 2d 459, 463 (D.
green Andes v. United States (2019)
Cited · W.D. Va. · signal: see
See Huff v. U. S. Dept. of Army, 508 F. Supp. 2d 459, 465 (D.
finding that the court lacked jurisdiction under the FTCA over the plaintiff’s claim that his military records had been tampered with
Cited (see also) · D. Maryland · signal: see also
Md. 2018); see also, e.g., Huff v. U.S. Dep’t of Army, 508 F. Supp. 2d 459, 461 (D.
Cited (see also) · D. Maryland · signal: see also
Md. 2018); see also, e.g., Huff v. U.S. Dep’t of Army, 508 F. Supp. 2d 459, 461 (D.