Cluster 2491156

Litig., 308 F. Supp. 2d 214, 224 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) (citing S.D.N.Y.

Litig., 308 F. Supp. 2d 214, 224 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) (citing S.D.N.Y.

Litig., 308 F. Supp. 2d 214, 224 (S.D.N.Y. 2004), vacated on other grounds sub nom.

Litig., 308 F.Supp.2d 214, 224 (S.D.N.Y.2004); Colodney v. Continuum Health Partners, Inc., No. 03-7276, 2004 WL 1857568 , at *1 (S.D.N.Y.

Litig., 308 F.Supp.2d 214, 232 (S.D.N.Y.2004) (“A party can 'plead himself out of court by alleging facts which show that he has no claim' ") (quoting Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors of Color Tile, Inc. v. Coopers and Lybrand, LLP., 322 F.3d 147, 167 (2d Cir.2003)); Nathenson v. Zonagen Inc., 267 F.3d 400, 414 (5th Cir.2003) ("It is clear that a fraud-on-the-market theory may not be the *294 basis for recovery in respect to an alleged misrepresentation which does not a…

Litig., 308 F.Supp.2d 214, 224 (S.D.N.Y. 2004); Colodney v. Continuum Health Partners, Inc., No. 03-7276, 2004 WL 1857568 , at *1 (S.D.N.Y.

“A motion for reconsideration should be granted only where the moving party demonstrates that the Court has overlooked factual matters or controlling precedent that were presented to it on the underlying motion and that would have changed its decision.” In re Worldcom, Inc. Securities Litigation, 308 F.Supp.2d 214, 224 (S.D.N.Y.2004); Colodney v. Continuum Health Partners, Inc., No. 03-7276, 2004 WL 1857568 , at *1 (S.D.N.Y.

Litig., 308 F.Supp.2d 214, 232 (S.D.N.Y.2004) (holding that claims did not relate back where plaintiffs failed to point to language in the original complaints that would have provided notice where original complaints were based on a separate transaction unrelated to the new claim).