Cluster 2568038
green
· 7 citation events
across 3 courts.
Showing the 5 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green
McIntire v. Astrue (2010)
See Richardson v. Apfel, 44 F.Supp.2d 556 , 562 n. 3 (S.D.N.Y.1999); Salmini v. Astrue, No. 06 Civ. 458, 2009 WL 1794741 , *10 (N.D.N.Y.
“Evidence is ‘new’ if it is not merely cumulative of what is already in the record”
While “[a] treating physician’s statement that the claimant is disabled cannot itself be determinative,” Snell, 177 F.3d at 133 , the “Appeals Council must give good reasons for the weight it assigns to a plaintiffs treating physician’s opinion.” Shrack v. Astrue, 608 F.Supp.2d 297, 302 (D.Conn.2009) (adopting report and recommendation) (citing Snell, 177 F.3d at 134 (remanding the case to the Appeals Council when it failed to explain why plaintiffs treating physician’s find…
green
Gonzalez v. Apfel (2000)
(Id. at 235, 237.) These forms indicated that plaintiffs extremities were warm with good peripheral pulses; his x-rays showed mild osteoarthritis in his back, shoulders and knees; his pain distribution was inconsistent with diabetic neu-ropathy; he suffered diabetes; and he should engage in non-weight bearing exercise and consider physical therapy. 11 (Id.) DISCUSSION “Judicial review of the Commissioner’s denial of benefits is strictly limited.” Richardson v. Apfel, 44 F.Su…
green
Woodford v. Apfel (2000)
Mem. at 23). “[J]udicial review of the Commissioner’s denial of benefits is strictly limited.” See Richardson v. Apfel, 44 F.Supp.2d 556, 560 (S.D.N.Y.1999) (Carter, J.).
green
Patterson v. Colvin (2014)
Dec. 8, 1998); see also Richardson v. Apfel, 44 F.Supp.2d 556 , 562 n. 3 (S.D.N.Y. 1999).