Cluster 2583919

“Nevertheless, unless requested, district courts are not required to make specific findings for each statutory factor if consideration is reflected in the proceeding transcripts, by opinion letter, or as findings in the written order.” In re Paternity of JWH, 2011 WY 66, ¶ 10 , 252 P.3d 942, 947 (Wyo. 2011) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Pahl v. Pahl, 2004 WY 40, ¶ 12 , 87 P.3d 1250, 1254 (Wyo. 2004)). [¶21] Despite the absence of a request for written findings …

C.f., Pahl v. Pahl, 2004 WY 40, ¶ 19 , 87 P.3d 1250, 1256 (Wyo. 2004) (the mother’s intrusive actions included insisting upon speaking with the child by telephone twice per day when the child was on a family trip with the father).

Cf. Pahl v. Pahl, 2004 WY 40, ¶ 20 , 87 P.3d 1250, 1256 (Wyo. 2004) (upholding the district court’s determination that mother’s relocation to Germany was not in the best interests of the child where reasonable visitation was cost prohibitive).

Paden , ¶ 11, 403 P.3d at 139 ; cf. Pahl , ¶ 20, 87 P.3d at 1256 (upholding the district court's determination that mother's relocation to Germany was not in the best interests of the child where reasonable visitation was cost prohibitive).

“Depending on the ease, different factors will present a greater need for emphasis.” Pahl v. Pahl, 2004 WY 40, ¶ 10 , 87 P.3d 1250, 1254 (Wyo. 2004).

“A court does not abuse its discretion unless it acts in a manner which exceeds the bounds of reason under the circumstances.” Williams v. Williams, 2016 WY 21, ¶ 13 , 368 P.3d 539, 544 (Wyo. 2016) (quoting Pahl v. Pahl, 2004 WY 40, ¶ 6 , 87 P.3d 1250, 1252 (Wyo. 2004)). [¶72] Rebecca argues that her hostility toward Lori is not, by itself, sufficient cause to remove her as trustee.

“A court does not abuse its discretion unless it acts in a manner which exceeds the bounds of reason under the circumstances.” Williams v. Williams, 2016 WY 21, ¶ 13 , 368 P.3d 539, 544 (Wyo. 2016) (quoting Pahl v. Pahl, 2004 WY 40, ¶ 6 , 87 P.3d 1250, 1252 (Wyo. 2004)). [¶72] Rebecca argues that her hostility toward Lori is not, by itself, sufficient cause to remove her as trustee.

This list is by no means exhaustive, nor is each factor included on this list necessarily entitled to similar weight, for the Superior Court “must look to the unique family relationships of each case in order to reach a resolution that is in the best interests of the child[ ] in that particular family.” Pahl v. Pahl, 2004 WY 40 , 87 P.3d 1250, 1253 (2004); see also Clark v. Div. of Family Servs., 975 A.2d 813, 822 (Del. 2009) (noting that “[i]t is well-established that the […

Pahl v. Pahl, 2004 WY 40, ¶ 6 , 87 P.3d 1250, 1252 (Wyo.2004) (quoting Reavis v. Reavis, 955 P.2d 428, 431 (Wyo.1998)). [¶ 14] Mother contends that the- district court, abused its discretion when it failed, to give adequate- weight to Father’s misconduct during the marriage, and when it erroneously determined that Father, shared in the role as primary caregiver for NJW.

Stevens v. Stevens, 2014 WY 23, ¶ 8 , 318 P.3d 802, 805-806 (Wyo.2014) (some citations omitted). [¶ 9] In Pahl v. Pahl, 2004 WY 40, ¶ 7 , 87 P.3d 1250, 1253 (Wyo.2004) we also said that "[Jludicial discretion is a composite of many things, among which are conclusions drawn from objective criteria; it means a sound judgment exercised with regard to what is right under the cireumstances and without doing so arbitrarily or eapriciously." [Citations omitted.] DISCUSSION [¶ 10] F…

Pahl v. Pahl, 2004 WY 40, ¶ 9 , 87 P.3d 1250, 1253 (Wyo.2004) (citations omitted). [¶ 9] When exercising its wide discretion in this area, the ultimate goal for the district court is a reasonable balance of the rights and affections of each parent, with paramount consideration being given to the welfare and needs of the children.

Pahl v. Pahl, 2004 WY 40, ¶ 9 , 87 P.3d 1250, 1253 (Wyo.2004) (citations omitted). [¶ 9] When exercising its wide discretion in this area, the ultimate goal for the district court is a reasonable balance of the rights and affections of each parent, with paramount consideration being given to the welfare and needs of the children.

See Witowski v. Roosevelt, 2009 WY 5, ¶ 13 , 199 P.3d 1072, 1076 (Wyo.2009); Bingham v. Bingham, 2007 WY 145, ¶ 10 , 167 P.3d 14, 17-18 (Wyo.2007); Pahl v. Pahl, 2004 WY 40, ¶ 6 , 87 P.3d 1250, 1252 (Wyo.2004). *607 Analysis [¶ 6] We begin by noting that Mother's appellate argument is premised on the belief that the district court deviated from the presumptive child support amount calculated pursuant to Wyo.

See also Witowski v. Roosevelt, 2009 WY 5, ¶ 13 , 199 P.3d 1072, 1076 (Wyo.2009); Bingham v. Bingham, 2007 WY 145, ¶ 10 , 167 P.3d 14, 17-18 (Wyo.2007); Pahl v. Pahl, 2004 WY 40, ¶ 6 , 87 P.3d 1250, 1252 (Wyo.2004).

Similarly, an abuse of discretion is present "when a material factor deserving significant weight is ignored." Pahl v. Pahl, 2004 WY 40, ¶6 , 87 P.3d 1250, 1252 (Wyo.2004).

Similarly, an abuse of discretion is present "'when a material factor deserving significant weight is ignored." " Pahl v. Pahl, 2004 WY 40, ¶ 6 , 87 P.3d 1250, 1252 (Wyo.2004).

Pahl v. Pahl, 2004 WY 40, ¶ 6 , 87 P.3d 1250, 1252 (Wyo.2004) (quoting Reavis v. Reavis, 955 P.2d 428, 431 (Wyo.1998)).

The one constant ... is that the resolution must be in the best interests of the children in that particular family." Pahl v. Pahl, 2004 WY 40, ¶ 10 , 87 P.3d 1250, 1254 (Wyo.2004).

Pahl v. Pahl, 2004 WY 40 , 1 6, 87 P.3d 1250, 1252 (Wyo.2004).

Pahl v. Pahl, 2004 WY 40, ¶ 6 , 87 P.3d 1250, ¶ 6 (Wyo.2004) (quoting Reavis v. Reavis, 955 P.2d 428, 431 (Wyo.1998)).

See Pahl v. Pahl, 2004 WY 40, ¶ 11 , 87 P.3d 1250, 1254 (Wyo.2004).

See also, Ianelli, ¶ 34, 444 P.3d at 70. “‘Depending on the case, different factors will present a greater need for emphasis.’” Paden, ¶ 11, 403 P.3d at 139 (quoting Pahl v. Pahl, 2004 WY 40, ¶ 10 , 87 P.3d 1250, 1254 (Wyo. 2004)). [¶34] Looking at§ 20-2-201(a), the district court found the parents equal with regard to subsections (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (v), the aspect of (vi) that pertains to how the parents interact and communicate with the children, and (ix).