Cluster 2625514

The district court's conclusions of law, however, are reviewed de novo." Bedore v. Familian, 122 Nev. 5, 9-10 , 125 P.3d 1168, 1171 (2006).

Bedore v. Familian, 122 Nev. 5, 9-10, 125 P.3d SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 12 (0)94Th A 1168, 1171 (2006) (stating that this court will not disturb a district court's findings of fact "if they are supported by substantial evidence" (internal quotation omitted)).

Additionally, while a referendum’s summary and title “need not be the best possible statement of a proposed measure’s intent,” it nevertheless must still be “straightforward, succinct, and nonargumentative.” Herbst Gaming, 122 Nev. at 889 , 141 P.3d at 1232 (internal quotations omitted). “‘This court has consistently provided that the district court’s findings of fact will not be disturbed on appeal if they are supported by substantial evidence.’ ” Bedore v. Familian, 122 Ne…

See Bedore, 125 P.3d at 1170 n.2 2 (treating as a derivative action a claim that corporate directors breached their fiduciary duty by 3 taking excessive compensation); Parametric Sound Corp. v. Eighth Jud.

Id.; see also 9 Bedore v. Familian, 125 P.3d 1168, 1172-74 (Nev. 2006) (affirming the trial court’s findings 10 and injunction ordering the executives to return the excess salaries). 11 Unlike Bedore, Plaintiff has not plausibly alleged excessive compensation.